Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the Finiteness of Isolated jj-invariants for X1(N)X_1(N)

Published 19 Aug 2026 in math.NT | (2608.19354v1)

Abstract: Characterizing isolated points on the modular curve X1(N)X_1(N) is a key obstruction to classifying all points of a fixed degree. These points do not lie in infinite parameterized families, making them difficult to obtain through geometric constructions. In this paper, we focus on the collection of "isolated jj-invariants" for X1(N)X_1(N), which are the values obtained by mapping isolated points to the jj-line. Prior work of the author in collaboration with Ejder, Liu, Odumodu, and Viray asks whether there are only finitely many isolated jj-invariants lying in extensions of bounded degree. Here, we explore how this question relates to other uniformity problems in the field and give new finiteness results for isolated jj-invariants in Q\mathbb{Q}. As an application, we show similar methods give sharpened polynomial bounds on torsion for non-CM elliptic curves having rational jj-invariant.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper proves the finiteness of rational isolated $j$-invariants for modular curves $X_1(p^a q^b)$ where $p, q$ are primes, using a structural theorem and specific cases with detailed ramification and torsion argument details, notably a prime case left incomplete as establishing.
  • The research establishes a sharp improvement in polynomial torsion bounds for non-CM elliptic curves with rational $j$-invariants, showing an exponent of $1/2 + extit{$\epsilon$}$ in the degree and concluding that no CM curve bounds exceeded the absolute minimum bound can uniformly hold unless adjusting for CM curves.
  • The finiteness of isolated $j$-invariants is linked to generalized Serre's Uniformity Conjecture, and the paper analyzed the implications and interdependencies among four hypotheses (H1-H4), deriving statement implications and constructive bounds

Overview and motivation

This paper by Abbey Bourdon studies "isolated jj-invariants" attached to the modular curves X1(N)X_1(N) (2608.19354). A closed point xX1(N)x \in X_1(N) is isolated if it belongs to no infinite parameterized family of points of the same degree — equivalently, it is neither P1\mathbb{P}^1-parameterized nor AV-parameterized via the Abel–Jacobi map Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C). Isolated points are precisely the obstruction to extending the classification of degree-dd points on X1(N)X_1(N) to degrees 5d95 \le d \le 9, as established by Derickx–van Hoeij and Najman–Varivoda. Mapping an isolated point to the jj-line yields an isolated jj-invariant, and the central question (posed previously by Bourdon, Ejder, Liu, Odumodu, and Viray) asks whether there are only finitely many such invariants of each fixed degree. While Faltings' theorem guarantees finitely many isolated points on any fixed curve of fixed degree, this does not imply uniformity across all levels X1(N)X_1(N)0, since the degree of the image on X1(N)X_1(N)1 may drop. The paper makes two contributions: a structural theorem relating the finiteness question to other uniformity conjectures, and new unconditional finiteness and torsion-bounding results for non-CM elliptic curves with rational X1(N)X_1(N)2-invariant.

Implications among uniformity hypotheses

The paper formulates four hypotheses for each degree X1(N)X_1(N)3: (H1) a generalization of Serre's Uniformity Conjecture asserting that mod-X1(N)X_1(N)4 images contain X1(N)X_1(N)5 for large X1(N)X_1(N)6; (H2) finiteness of isolated X1(N)X_1(N)7-invariants of degree X1(N)X_1(N)8; (H3) absence of non-cuspidal non-CM degree-X1(N)X_1(N)9 points on xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)0 for large xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)1; and (H4) refined polynomial bounds on xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)2 and xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)3. The main structural result is that H1 implies H2, and H2 implies both H3 and H4.

The implication H2 ⟹ H3 proceeds by lifting a degree-xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)4 point on xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)5 to xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)6 with degree at most xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)7, which falls below half the xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)8-gonality for large xX1(N)x \in X_1(N)9 by Abramovich's gonality bounds; Frey's criterion then renders the lift sporadic, hence isolated, so its P1\mathbb{P}^10-invariant lies in a finite list, and Serre's Open Image Theorem bounds the possible levels. The implication H2 ⟹ H4 uses a key technical lemma: assuming H2, every point P1\mathbb{P}^11 associated to a curve with P1\mathbb{P}^12 satisfies P1\mathbb{P}^13, combining a uniform-level argument (building on work of Circu-Theodorou and BELOV) with Abramovich gonality bounds. Consequently, a point of order P1\mathbb{P}^14 over a field of degree P1\mathbb{P}^15 forces P1\mathbb{P}^16. Notably, the paper observes that the proof of the related claim in Clark–Pollack relies on a result of Lombardo–Radicke containing an error, so the present argument repairs that gap. The author also notes that if Hypothesis 2 is assumed only for prime levels P1\mathbb{P}^17, H3 still follows — a useful weakening.

Finiteness for P1\mathbb{P}^18

The first unconditional main result states that there are only finitely many rational isolated P1\mathbb{P}^19-invariants arising from modular curves Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)0 with Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)1 prime. The proof handles three cases. If both primes satisfy Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)2, uniform boundedness of Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)3-adic image levels reduces to finitely many target curves, each having finitely many isolated points by Faltings. If Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)4 with surjective mod-Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)5 image, the fiber product structure theorem of BELOV shows the point projects isometrically onto an isolated point of Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)6, which was classified in prior joint work. The difficult case is Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)7 with Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)8. Here the paper establishes a sharpened ramification-theoretic input: building on Smith's work on local Galois representations, if Symd(C)Jac(C)\mathrm{Sym}^d(C) \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)9 is the field cut out by torsion coprime to dd0, then adjoining a point of order dd1 requires degree at least dd2 locally. This improves the factor appearing in Bourdon–Genao's Proposition 5 from a loss depending on potentially bad reduction to the absolute constant dd3, using the fact that for dd4 the minimal extension attaining good reduction has degree dividing 12 (indeed in dd5 after accounting for the relevant cases). Combined with Lemos' analysis of when the non-surjective prime divisors interact, the resulting lower bound dd6 exceeds the genus of dd7, ruling out isolation. The exceptional 2-adic images 4.8.0.2, 4.16.0.2, and 8.16.0.3 require separate treatment but yield the same conclusion.

Sharpened polynomial torsion bounds

The second main result improves prior bounds of Bourdon–Genao and Clark–Pollack by a square root in the degree: for every dd8 there exists dd9 such that all non-CM X1(N)X_1(N)0 with X1(N)X_1(N)1 satisfy

X1(N)X_1(N)2

Two features merit emphasis. First, the exponent X1(N)X_1(N)3 is essentially optimal: any elliptic curve over X1(N)X_1(N)4 acquires a point of prime order X1(N)X_1(N)5 over an extension of degree at most X1(N)X_1(N)6, so no bound with exponent below X1(N)X_1(N)7 can hold uniformly. Second, this is stated to be the first exponent bound too small to accommodate CM curves — the CM curve with X1(N)X_1(N)8 achieves X1(N)X_1(N)9 along suitable fields, so CM exclusion is genuinely necessary rather than an artifact of the method.

The proof combines the lower-bound proposition 5d95 \le d \le 90 with Robin's bound 5d95 \le d \le 91; the contribution of the factor 5d95 \le d \le 92 is absorbed into 5d95 \le d \le 93, yielding 5d95 \le d \le 94. Since 5d95 \le d \le 95 divides 5d95 \le d \le 96, the full-torsion bound follows.

Relation to Hindry–Silverman and Serre uniformity

A final section proves a conditional converse: if there exists an absolute constant 5d95 \le d \le 97 with 5d95 \le d \le 98 for all non-CM 5d95 \le d \le 99 with jj0, then generalized Serre uniformity (Hypothesis 1) holds. The argument runs the standard dichotomy for small image — Borel, split Cartan normalizer, or non-split Cartan normalizer, excluding exceptional projective images jj1 via Ghate–Parent for jj2 — and in each case constructs a field of controlled degree containing a point of order jj3 or jj4, contradicting the hypothetical bound. This connects the torsion-bounding question to a problem of Hindry and Silverman and to Breuer's construction showing jj5 is asymptotically sharp for the full torsion subgroup.

Examples and computational justification

The paper tabulates known non-CM isolated jj6-invariants of degree up to 10, drawing primarily on van Hoeij's tables. There are exactly four rational ones, conjectured (elsewhere) to be complete, arising from jj7, jj8, and jj9; higher-degree examples include 15 non-CM isolated jj0-invariants of degree 9. Justification that these points are isolated uses rank-zero hypotheses on Jacobians (via the classification of degree-4 points), known gonalities for jj1, and the genus/gonality bound for jj2; non-CM status follows from a degree lower bound for CM points of degree greater than one.

Limitations and open questions

Several restrictions are conceded explicitly. The finiteness theorem covers only products of two distinct primes; the corollary's loss factor of jj3 prevents extension to three or more primes, since the resulting degree bounds fall short of the genus. Removing the factor jj4 amounts to controlling horizontal Galois entanglement between jj5 and jj6 when jj7; the paper identifies specific LMFDB curves (e.g., 15.60.3.f.1, 21.126.4.a.1) where the factor cannot currently be removed, though notably each possesses a nontrivial rank 0 quotient unlike the naive fiber product jj8 — suggesting formal immersion arguments may eventually apply. Hypothesis 2 itself remains unproven even for rational jj9-invariants. Finally, the torsion bound requires X1(N)X_1(N)00 slack and applies only to non-CM curves, and the equivalence-type statement connecting absolute torsion constants to Serre uniformity is conditional on the Hindry–Silverman-style bound holding.

Conclusion

This paper positions the finiteness of isolated X1(N)X_1(N)01-invariants as an intermediate uniformity statement, strictly weaker than generalized Serre uniformity yet strong enough to imply both non-CM isogeny bounds for X1(N)X_1(N)02 and refined polynomial torsion bounds. Unconditionally, it settles the question for levels supported on at most two primes over X1(N)X_1(N)03 and delivers the sharpest known torsion exponents (X1(N)X_1(N)04 on the exponent, X1(N)X_1(N)05 on cardinality) for non-CM curves with rational X1(N)X_1(N)06-invariant, while demonstrating via the conditional converse that sufficiently strong absolute torsion bounds would recover Serre uniformity itself. The remaining obstructions are localized precisely in entanglement phenomena, for which the paper provides concrete computational targets in the LMFDB.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.