- The paper proves the finiteness of rational isolated $j$-invariants for modular curves $X_1(p^a q^b)$ where $p, q$ are primes, using a structural theorem and specific cases with detailed ramification and torsion argument details, notably a prime case left incomplete as establishing.
- The research establishes a sharp improvement in polynomial torsion bounds for non-CM elliptic curves with rational $j$-invariants, showing an exponent of $1/2 + extit{$\epsilon$}$ in the degree and concluding that no CM curve bounds exceeded the absolute minimum bound can uniformly hold unless adjusting for CM curves.
- The finiteness of isolated $j$-invariants is linked to generalized Serre's Uniformity Conjecture, and the paper analyzed the implications and interdependencies among four hypotheses (H1-H4), deriving statement implications and constructive bounds
Overview and motivation
This paper by Abbey Bourdon studies "isolated j-invariants" attached to the modular curves X1(N) (2608.19354). A closed point x∈X1(N) is isolated if it belongs to no infinite parameterized family of points of the same degree — equivalently, it is neither P1-parameterized nor AV-parameterized via the Abel–Jacobi map Symd(C)→Jac(C). Isolated points are precisely the obstruction to extending the classification of degree-d points on X1(N) to degrees 5≤d≤9, as established by Derickx–van Hoeij and Najman–Varivoda. Mapping an isolated point to the j-line yields an isolated j-invariant, and the central question (posed previously by Bourdon, Ejder, Liu, Odumodu, and Viray) asks whether there are only finitely many such invariants of each fixed degree. While Faltings' theorem guarantees finitely many isolated points on any fixed curve of fixed degree, this does not imply uniformity across all levels X1(N)0, since the degree of the image on X1(N)1 may drop. The paper makes two contributions: a structural theorem relating the finiteness question to other uniformity conjectures, and new unconditional finiteness and torsion-bounding results for non-CM elliptic curves with rational X1(N)2-invariant.
The paper formulates four hypotheses for each degree X1(N)3: (H1) a generalization of Serre's Uniformity Conjecture asserting that mod-X1(N)4 images contain X1(N)5 for large X1(N)6; (H2) finiteness of isolated X1(N)7-invariants of degree X1(N)8; (H3) absence of non-cuspidal non-CM degree-X1(N)9 points on x∈X1(N)0 for large x∈X1(N)1; and (H4) refined polynomial bounds on x∈X1(N)2 and x∈X1(N)3. The main structural result is that H1 implies H2, and H2 implies both H3 and H4.
The implication H2 ⟹ H3 proceeds by lifting a degree-x∈X1(N)4 point on x∈X1(N)5 to x∈X1(N)6 with degree at most x∈X1(N)7, which falls below half the x∈X1(N)8-gonality for large x∈X1(N)9 by Abramovich's gonality bounds; Frey's criterion then renders the lift sporadic, hence isolated, so its P10-invariant lies in a finite list, and Serre's Open Image Theorem bounds the possible levels. The implication H2 ⟹ H4 uses a key technical lemma: assuming H2, every point P11 associated to a curve with P12 satisfies P13, combining a uniform-level argument (building on work of Circu-Theodorou and BELOV) with Abramovich gonality bounds. Consequently, a point of order P14 over a field of degree P15 forces P16. Notably, the paper observes that the proof of the related claim in Clark–Pollack relies on a result of Lombardo–Radicke containing an error, so the present argument repairs that gap. The author also notes that if Hypothesis 2 is assumed only for prime levels P17, H3 still follows — a useful weakening.
Finiteness for P18
The first unconditional main result states that there are only finitely many rational isolated P19-invariants arising from modular curves Symd(C)→Jac(C)0 with Symd(C)→Jac(C)1 prime. The proof handles three cases. If both primes satisfy Symd(C)→Jac(C)2, uniform boundedness of Symd(C)→Jac(C)3-adic image levels reduces to finitely many target curves, each having finitely many isolated points by Faltings. If Symd(C)→Jac(C)4 with surjective mod-Symd(C)→Jac(C)5 image, the fiber product structure theorem of BELOV shows the point projects isometrically onto an isolated point of Symd(C)→Jac(C)6, which was classified in prior joint work. The difficult case is Symd(C)→Jac(C)7 with Symd(C)→Jac(C)8. Here the paper establishes a sharpened ramification-theoretic input: building on Smith's work on local Galois representations, if Symd(C)→Jac(C)9 is the field cut out by torsion coprime to d0, then adjoining a point of order d1 requires degree at least d2 locally. This improves the factor appearing in Bourdon–Genao's Proposition 5 from a loss depending on potentially bad reduction to the absolute constant d3, using the fact that for d4 the minimal extension attaining good reduction has degree dividing 12 (indeed in d5 after accounting for the relevant cases). Combined with Lemos' analysis of when the non-surjective prime divisors interact, the resulting lower bound d6 exceeds the genus of d7, ruling out isolation. The exceptional 2-adic images 4.8.0.2, 4.16.0.2, and 8.16.0.3 require separate treatment but yield the same conclusion.
Sharpened polynomial torsion bounds
The second main result improves prior bounds of Bourdon–Genao and Clark–Pollack by a square root in the degree: for every d8 there exists d9 such that all non-CM X1(N)0 with X1(N)1 satisfy
X1(N)2
Two features merit emphasis. First, the exponent X1(N)3 is essentially optimal: any elliptic curve over X1(N)4 acquires a point of prime order X1(N)5 over an extension of degree at most X1(N)6, so no bound with exponent below X1(N)7 can hold uniformly. Second, this is stated to be the first exponent bound too small to accommodate CM curves — the CM curve with X1(N)8 achieves X1(N)9 along suitable fields, so CM exclusion is genuinely necessary rather than an artifact of the method.
The proof combines the lower-bound proposition 5≤d≤90 with Robin's bound 5≤d≤91; the contribution of the factor 5≤d≤92 is absorbed into 5≤d≤93, yielding 5≤d≤94. Since 5≤d≤95 divides 5≤d≤96, the full-torsion bound follows.
A final section proves a conditional converse: if there exists an absolute constant 5≤d≤97 with 5≤d≤98 for all non-CM 5≤d≤99 with j0, then generalized Serre uniformity (Hypothesis 1) holds. The argument runs the standard dichotomy for small image — Borel, split Cartan normalizer, or non-split Cartan normalizer, excluding exceptional projective images j1 via Ghate–Parent for j2 — and in each case constructs a field of controlled degree containing a point of order j3 or j4, contradicting the hypothetical bound. This connects the torsion-bounding question to a problem of Hindry and Silverman and to Breuer's construction showing j5 is asymptotically sharp for the full torsion subgroup.
Examples and computational justification
The paper tabulates known non-CM isolated j6-invariants of degree up to 10, drawing primarily on van Hoeij's tables. There are exactly four rational ones, conjectured (elsewhere) to be complete, arising from j7, j8, and j9; higher-degree examples include 15 non-CM isolated j0-invariants of degree 9. Justification that these points are isolated uses rank-zero hypotheses on Jacobians (via the classification of degree-4 points), known gonalities for j1, and the genus/gonality bound for j2; non-CM status follows from a degree lower bound for CM points of degree greater than one.
Limitations and open questions
Several restrictions are conceded explicitly. The finiteness theorem covers only products of two distinct primes; the corollary's loss factor of j3 prevents extension to three or more primes, since the resulting degree bounds fall short of the genus. Removing the factor j4 amounts to controlling horizontal Galois entanglement between j5 and j6 when j7; the paper identifies specific LMFDB curves (e.g., 15.60.3.f.1, 21.126.4.a.1) where the factor cannot currently be removed, though notably each possesses a nontrivial rank 0 quotient unlike the naive fiber product j8 — suggesting formal immersion arguments may eventually apply. Hypothesis 2 itself remains unproven even for rational j9-invariants. Finally, the torsion bound requires X1(N)00 slack and applies only to non-CM curves, and the equivalence-type statement connecting absolute torsion constants to Serre uniformity is conditional on the Hindry–Silverman-style bound holding.
Conclusion
This paper positions the finiteness of isolated X1(N)01-invariants as an intermediate uniformity statement, strictly weaker than generalized Serre uniformity yet strong enough to imply both non-CM isogeny bounds for X1(N)02 and refined polynomial torsion bounds. Unconditionally, it settles the question for levels supported on at most two primes over X1(N)03 and delivers the sharpest known torsion exponents (X1(N)04 on the exponent, X1(N)05 on cardinality) for non-CM curves with rational X1(N)06-invariant, while demonstrating via the conditional converse that sufficiently strong absolute torsion bounds would recover Serre uniformity itself. The remaining obstructions are localized precisely in entanglement phenomena, for which the paper provides concrete computational targets in the LMFDB.