- The paper proposes a device utilizing a reconfigurable domain wall and is able both to calibrate the Chern number and to measure the parity of vortices, using quantized thermal conductance and a Fabry-Pérot resonator in one device.
- The calorimetry principle is the Fabry-Pérot interference of Majorana branches with the sector switch defined by vortex parity.
- System performances reach high specific contrasts, compounded by transparency and feasibility checks, investments both into plausible materials and proposal confirms the practical potential.
Summary of the proposal
This paper proposes a thermal-conductance measurement that reads out, on a single object, both the bulk topological invariant and the vortex parity of an intrinsic two-dimensional chiral superconductor. The central object is a reconfigurable domain wall between regions of opposite BdG Chern number ν=±C in symmetry class D. By bulk-boundary correspondence such a wall carries N=2∣C∣ co-propagating chiral Majorana channels; for ∣C∣=1 this is two Majorana branches with total chiral central charge ∣C∣. The device operates in two modes. With point contacts opened, the wall is a ballistic channel whose quantized thermal conductance fixes ∣C∣ through the Majorana quantum π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−13 W/K² per branch. With the contacts partially closed (ci=cosθi≈0.9), the same wall becomes a Fabry–Pérot resonator whose resonance comb is shifted by half a level spacing depending on whether the enclosed number of vortices nv is even or odd — the Neveu–Schwarz versus Ramond spin structure of the closed Majorana edge.
The key physical mechanism is the standard branch-cut argument: transporting a Majorana operator around a contour enclosing an odd number of vortices converts antiperiodic into periodic boundary conditions via the sign σ=(−1)nv+1. The single-particle spectrum then takes values εn=(2πℏv/L)n (Ramond, containing a zero mode) versus N=2∣C∣0 (Neveu–Schwarz). Because the thermal weight N=2∣C∣1 vanishes quadratically at zero energy, the Ramond zero mode carries heat only through its finite width; the sectors are distinguished by where the first heat-carrying level sits. This yields a two-level thermal conductance that flips each time the enclosed vortex parity changes.
The paper derives the exact transmission by summing the multiple-traversal geometric series,
N=2∣C∣2
together with its elastic heat full counting statistics in Levitov–Lesovik form restricted to positive energies. Notably, only the total perimeter enters, not the individual arc lengths — a structural difference from two-arm Fu–Kane/Akhmerov–Nilsson–Beenakker interferometers, where parity moves the outgoing particle species rather than the spectrum and therefore produces no heat contrast.
A precise no-go: fusion blindness
A theorem delimits what this observable can and cannot measure. For well-separated vortex cores, every quantity entering linear-response heat transport is a functional of the real antisymmetric Majorana-basis Hamiltonian matrix N=2∣C∣3. The Ising fusion label N=2∣C∣4 (eigenvalue N=2∣C∣5 for vacuum N=2∣C∣6, N=2∣C∣7 for fermion N=2∣C∣8) labels the occupation of a degenerate many-body manifold without changing N=2∣C∣9, and hence cannot change the linear-response thermal conductance. Both even-vortex fusion outcomes carry Neveu–Schwarz boundary conditions and identical single-particle combs. The interferometer is therefore explicitly not a fusion-rule measurement; achieving fusion sensitivity requires non-Gaussian ∣C∣=10-tunneling or charging-energy constraints, as in existing proposals. This is stated plainly rather than left implicit, which strengthens the claim's credibility: the retained observable is vortex parity, weaker than fusion but more constrained than generic spectroscopy.
Numerical contrast and material feasibility
At the dimensionless finite-size ratio ∣C∣=11 and contact return amplitudes ∣C∣=12, the Neveu–Schwarz sector conducts ∣C∣=13 times more heat than Ramond; the signed contrast exceeds ∣C∣=14 in magnitude in the sharp-resonance corner. A sign reversal of the contrast occurs near ∣C∣=15, where the ordering of sector conductances flips as the NS level exits the thermal window. Representative rhombohedral-graphene parameters (∣C∣=16 mK from Han et al., ∣C∣=17 nm∣C∣=18 from octalayer Landau fans, gap ratios ∣C∣=19–∣C∣0) give edge velocities ∣C∣1–∣C∣2 m/s, three orders below the graphene Fermi velocity. At ∣C∣3 mK, submicron loops reach ∣C∣4 of order unity, placing them in the resolved regime accessible to existing graphene Johnson-noise thermometry (~5% quantized-thermal-conductance accuracy). Against Sr∣C∣5RuO∣C∣6, UTe∣C∣7 and Fe(Te,Se), RHG offers the largest resolving perimeter relative to the bulk coherence length at fixed ∣C∣8, owing to its small Fermi wavevector.
Two caveats temper these numbers. The gap ratio is an illustrative benchmark, not a spectroscopic determination, so direct measurement of ∣C∣9 would reduce the dominant scale uncertainty. And class D does not protect branch independence: intervalley mixing can shift or even null the parity contrast at isolated holonomies (e.g., ∣C∣0 maps the two sectors' combs onto one another), although the open-contact plateau remains universal.
Systematics: false positives and coherence
The paper identifies an intrinsic false positive: a vortex hybridized with the wall from outside the contour contributes a low-energy ∣C∣1 phase shift spectrally indistinguishable from an enclosed vortex, with spurious contrast growing to 89.6% of the true value at ∣C∣2. Two discriminators are provided. Temperature dependence separates them because the true switch depends only on ∣C∣3 (crossing zero at ∣C∣4 for ∣C∣5), while the artefact requires an additional parameter and does not collapse onto the same curve. More powerfully, the fixed-field geometric switch — rewriting the contour so the same pinned vortex passes inside or outside — toggles the true signal while leaving the exponentially distance-controlled hybridization approximately fixed; this control exists only because the wall is rewritable.
Heat full counting statistics supplies a third test: at a deliberately constructed mean-degenerate point (a clean NS loop and a hybridized R loop tuned to identical average current), the normalized second cumulants differ by ∣C∣6, falsifying the mimic without any braiding operation. Partial coherence is treated exactly within a Büttiker-type damping model: the contrast halves at ∣C∣7 for representative parameters. Since ∣C∣8 has not been measured for an RHG chiral Majorana wall, coherent propagation around the loop remains an explicit experimental requirement rather than a derived property — though intrinsic inelastic scattering is expected weak because charge conjugation forbids ordinary electron–phonon coupling and the lowest local self-interaction carries six derivatives.
Experimental protocol
Three thermal tests are specified. First, the open-contact plateau calibrates ∣C∣9 against a known quantum on the same wall before resonant operation. Second, field-driven sweeps give a two-level conductance switch correlated with independently identified vortex-entry events (using nanoSQUID derivative analysis to separate Meissner background from discrete entries); entry fields need not be equally spaced, and the signature is the switch itself, not periodicity. Third, and most cleanly, the fixed-field geometric switch rewrites the contour around a pinned vortex at fixed field, eliminating field-sweep ambiguity entirely. Falsification criteria are explicit: a sinusoidal response persisting at fixed vortex configuration indicates trivial continuous-flux interference; a nonquantized plateau invalidates the gapped-Chern interpretation (a Bogoliubov Fermi surface being one possible origin); and the clean null control is tuning π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−130, since even-π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−131 phases are not strict nulls.
Limitations and open questions
The construction rests on several assumptions stated candidly. Applying the π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−132 wall picture to imaged RHG domains assumes opposite chirality implies opposite BdG Chern number — present imaging establishes chirality reversal but not this topological identification, so the gappedness criterion π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−133 must hold along the relevant gate path. Arbitrary micron-scale closed-contour writing around an individual Abrikosov vortex exceeds what deterministic domain reconfiguration has demonstrated; chip-integrated vortex manipulation in NbSeπ2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−134 shows single-vortex positioning is feasible, but its combination with rewritable chiral walls in RHG does not exist yet. The optional charge-based cross-check (Fu–Kane conductance π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−135 or π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−136) would require local coexistence of a charged QAH edge with the superconductor, also undemonstrated. Finally, whether the predicted signatures can be observed at all reduces to two open experimental quantities: the actual coherence length π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−137 of an RHG domain-wall Majorana mode, and a spectroscopic determination of π2kB2T/6h≃4.732×10−138.
Conclusion
The paper establishes a self-calibrating scheme in which one rewritable domain wall serves simultaneously as a Chern-number thermometer (quantized plateau) and a vortex-parity interferometer (half-level spectral shift read as a two-level heat conductance). The information content is sharply delimited — parity yes, fusion channel no — and the dominant systematics are identified and given concrete discriminators. Whether the required contour pinning, bulk-gap topology identification, and loop-scale phase coherence can be realized in rhombohedral graphene are precisely formulated questions the theory leaves to experiment.