Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On a classical zero-sum invariant

Published 19 Aug 2026 in math.NT and math.CO | (2608.19090v1)

Abstract: Let GG be a nontrivial, finite abelian group. Then ν(G)ν(G) is the smallest integer \ell such that every zero-sum free sequence TT over GG of length at least \ell has the following property: all nonzero elements of GG that do not occur as a subsequence sum of TT lie in a proper coset of some subgroup of GG. We study the invariant ν(G)ν(G), which was introduced in Zero-Sum Theory in the 1960s.

Summary

  • The paper proves that ν(G) = ν₂(G) = 𝖽(G) − 1 for C₂² ⊕ C₂ₙ for all n and for C₂⁴ ⊕ C₂ₙ when n > 70 is odd, including groups where the Davenport constant exceeds its standard lower bound.
  • The paper introduces the prime-index invariant νₚ(G) and local invariants ν(S), using group-algebra methods, extremal sequence classifications, and complement identities to connect missing subsequence sums with the structure of maximal minimal zero-sum sequences.
  • The paper shows that these refinements constrain element orders in extremal sequences, provide a heredity principle for direct factors, and clarify why determining whether any group satisfies ν(G) = 𝖽(G) remains an open problem.

The invariant and its history

Let GG be a nontrivial finite abelian group. The invariant ν(G)\nu(G), introduced by van Emde Boas in the 1960s in his work on the Davenport constant of rank three groups (2608.19090), is defined as the smallest integer \ell such that every zero-sum free sequence TT over GG with T|T| \ge \ell has the property that the set GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T) of nonzero group elements not representable as subsequence sums of TT is contained in a proper coset α+H\alpha + H of some subgroup HGH \subsetneq G. Since every zero-sum free sequence of length ν(G)\nu(G)0 satisfies ν(G)\nu(G)1, one always has

ν(G)\nu(G)2

and for cyclic groups equality holds throughout with ν(G)\nu(G)3. Gao conjectured roughly three decades ago that ν(G)\nu(G)4 holds for all nontrivial finite abelian groups; this remains open, and prior to this work the precise value of ν(G)\nu(G)5 was known only for cyclic groups, ν(G)\nu(G)6-groups, and rank two groups — all cases where additionally ν(G)\nu(G)7. No group is known with ν(G)\nu(G)8.

The paper makes progress on two fronts: it establishes ν(G)\nu(G)9 for new families of groups (including groups where the Davenport constant strictly exceeds \ell0), and it introduces refinements — a prime-index variant \ell1 and local variants \ell2 attached to maximal zero-sum free sequences — that connect the invariant to structural questions about extremal minimal zero-sum sequences.

A refinement via index-\ell3 subgroups

The paper defines \ell4 analogously to \ell5 but requires that the missing subsequence sums lie in a coset of a subgroup of index exactly \ell6. Clearly

\ell7

Two exact determinations are given. For cyclic groups, the argument reduces to Olson's structure theorem for zero-sum free sequences of maximal length, forcing \ell8 up to translation, so the single missing element lies outside the unique index-\ell9 subgroup (2608.19090). For TT0-groups, the proof is a group algebra argument over TT1: associating to each TT2 the scalar TT3 defined by TT4, where TT5, the authors show TT6 is a homomorphism using the identity TT7 together with the vanishing of TT8 at length TT9. Any missing element GG0 satisfies GG1, so GG2 with GG3. Hence GG4 for all finite abelian GG5-groups.

This yields a structural corollary of independent interest: for GG6, every element occurring in a minimal zero-sum sequence of maximal length has full order GG7. Previously only the existence of one full-order element was known for GG8. More generally, Proposition 3.2 shows that if GG9 for all primes T|T| \ge \ell0 and T|T| \ge \ell1, then every element of every maximal-length minimal zero-sum sequence has order equal to the exponent — resolving in the affirmative, for such groups, a long-standing open conjecture on the orders of elements in extremal sequences. This illustrates how the seemingly bookkeeping invariant T|T| \ge \ell2 controls deep structural properties of T|T| \ge \ell3.

Groups of the form T|T| \ge \ell4

The main result of Section 4 is that T|T| \ge \ell5 for all T|T| \ge \ell6. This statement had been announced by Schmid without proof. The proof rests on Schmid's classification of minimal zero-sum sequences of length T|T| \ge \ell7 into six types (a)–(f) relative to a basis T|T| \ge \ell8 with T|T| \ge \ell9, GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)0.

A key technical contribution is Lemma 4.3 and Corollary 4.4: after splitting type (b) into a normalized form (b*) and separating the degenerate case (d*) from (d), the authors show that the type of an extremal minimal zero-sum sequence is uniquely determined by its support partition into the sets GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)1, GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)2, and GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)3, whose cardinalities are tabulated per type. In particular, no basis change can alter the type of a given GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)4, except possibly between (d*) and (d).

The proof of the main theorem proceeds by fixing a zero-sum free GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)5 with GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)6 and analyzing the set of maximal sequences GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)7 containing GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)8, via the identity (Proposition 2.6)

GΣ(T)G^{\bullet} \setminus \Sigma(T)9

which expresses the missing sums through the supports of the complements TT0. Cases with at most two missing elements are handled directly (using that all elements of extremal sequences avoid TT1); when TT2 the quotient argument forces an index-2 subgroup; and the remaining types reduce to a lengthy case analysis (Lemma 4.6) built around sequences concentrated in the coset TT3.

Groups with TT4: the case TT5

All previously studied groups satisfied TT6. Theorem 5.5 breaks this pattern: for TT7 with TT8 odd — a family with TT9, whose precise Davenport constant was determined only recently — the authors prove α+H\alpha + H0.

The proof exploits the rigid structure of extremal sequences here: by the classification of Chen–Savchev, every α+H\alpha + H1 has the form α+H\alpha + H2 with α+H\alpha + H3 of order α+H\alpha + H4 and the remaining eight terms projecting to a distinguished 8-element subset α+H\alpha + H5 satisfying Property P (all subset sums have odd cardinality). A combinatorial lemma shows that any 6-element subset α+H\alpha + H6 determines α+H\alpha + H7 uniquely as the complement of a subgroup of order 8. Consequently, a zero-sum free α+H\alpha + H8 of length α+H\alpha + H9 extending to some HGH \subsetneq G0 either has small height (in which case HGH \subsetneq G1 is unique and at most two elements are missing, handled by a linear-algebra argument over HGH \subsetneq G2) or contains HGH \subsetneq G3, in which case uniqueness of HGH \subsetneq G4 pins down the possible complements explicitly, and both candidate missing sets lie in a coset of an explicit index-2 subgroup.

The restriction HGH \subsetneq G5 odd is inherited from the underlying classification theorem and is not intrinsic to the method; whether the result extends to even HGH \subsetneq G6 or smaller odd HGH \subsetneq G7 is left open.

Local variants and their consequences

Section 6 introduces HGH \subsetneq G8 for a maximal zero-sum free sequence HGH \subsetneq G9 (one with ν(G)\nu(G)00): the smallest threshold ensuring that subsequences ν(G)\nu(G)01 of length at least ν(G)\nu(G)02 have ν(G)\nu(G)03 inside a proper coset. Two facts organize the theory:

  • ν(G)\nu(G)04 always;
  • ν(G)\nu(G)05.

Thus ν(G)\nu(G)06 holds precisely when some extremal maximal zero-sum free sequence ν(G)\nu(G)07 has ν(G)\nu(G)08. Such sequences exist over prime cyclic groups, but only with ν(G)\nu(G)09; the "standard" basis sequence ν(G)\nu(G)10 always has ν(G)\nu(G)11.

Theorem 6.4 gives a heredity mechanism: if ν(G)\nu(G)12 with ν(G)\nu(G)13 and ν(G)\nu(G)14, then ν(G)\nu(G)15. So verifying Gao's conjecture for a group automatically verifies it for suitable direct factors — conversely, a counterexample must propagate upward.

Two applications demonstrate the flexibility of the local viewpoint. First, the authors exhibit an explicit zero-sum free sequence ν(G)\nu(G)16 of length ν(G)\nu(G)17 over ν(G)\nu(G)18, verify by exhaustive congruence analysis that it is maximal zero-sum free with ν(G)\nu(G)19, and thereby show that ν(G)\nu(G)20 for this family — a fact not previously recorded. Second, for ν(G)\nu(G)21 they construct minimal zero-sum sequences of length ν(G)\nu(G)22 with maximum multiplicity ν(G)\nu(G)23 (all previously known examples had height ν(G)\nu(G)24) and show that the associated near-extremal subsequences satisfy ν(G)\nu(G)25. The latter analysis is delicate: it requires ruling out, case by case, additional missing subsequence sums using the non-degeneracy of the coefficient sequences ν(G)\nu(G)26 and ν(G)\nu(G)27 modulo ν(G)\nu(G)28.

Limitations and open questions

Several caveats bound the scope of these results. The main theorems cover ν(G)\nu(G)29 (all ν(G)\nu(G)30) and ν(G)\nu(G)31 (ν(G)\nu(G)32 odd) only; the extension to ν(G)\nu(G)33 for ν(G)\nu(G)34, or to ν(G)\nu(G)35 with even or small odd ν(G)\nu(G)36, is not addressed. Gao's conjecture ν(G)\nu(G)37 remains open in general, and the authors state plainly that in light of current knowledge of the Davenport constant it "seems to be out of reach"; they propose restricting attention to groups with ν(G)\nu(G)38 as a realistic intermediate goal. Whether any group at all satisfies ν(G)\nu(G)39 is unknown, though the local theory shows this would require an extremal maximal zero-sum free sequence with ν(G)\nu(G)40. Finally, the structural corollary on element orders applies to groups ν(G)\nu(G)41 only under the hypothesis that ν(G)\nu(G)42 for every prime ν(G)\nu(G)43; since ν(G)\nu(G)44 itself is open for ν(G)\nu(G)45 and general ν(G)\nu(G)46, and no structural conjecture for ν(G)\nu(G)47 exists there, the reach of this corollary is currently limited to the groups treated in Sections 3–5.

Conclusion

This paper substantially extends the class of finite abelian groups for which the classical van Emde Boas invariant is computed exactly, proving ν(G)\nu(G)48 for ν(G)\nu(G)49 unconditionally and for ν(G)\nu(G)50 with ν(G)\nu(G)51 odd — the first instances beyond groups with ν(G)\nu(G)52. The refined invariants ν(G)\nu(G)53 and ν(G)\nu(G)54 are shown to be more than technical devices: ν(G)\nu(G)55 yields the strongest known results on element orders in maximal-length minimal zero-sum sequences over elementary ν(G)\nu(G)56-power groups, while the local variants clarify exactly what a counterexample to Gao's conjecture would require and provide a descent mechanism excluding counterexamples on direct factors. The combination of inverse-type classifications of ν(G)\nu(G)57 with the complement identity for missing subsequence sums emerges as an effective general strategy, one whose applicability to higher-rank groups remains the central open question raised by this work.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.