- The paper explicitly determines the first Galois obstruction for every genus g≥2 as σ₃(g)=180(g−1)gε−j, separating a trace-kernel component from a boundary-dependent correction term.
- Using symplectic representation theory, chord-diagram calculations, detector functionals, and polynomial interpolation in the genus, the authors prove that this representative normalizes the Johnson image.
- The paper computes the trace ratio ES₆¹(σ₃(g))/ES₆²(σ₃(g))=2g−1, showing that the obstruction’s nontrivial Enomoto–Satoh trace comes entirely from the correction term j.
The paper determines explicitly the first Galois obstruction σ3(g)=τ^g,1(6)(σ3) inside the cokernel of the Johnson homomorphism for surfaces of every genus g≥2, and computes the value of the Enomoto–Satoh trace map on it. The obstruction is expressed as a sum of two structurally distinct terms: one lying in the kernel of the Enomoto–Satoh trace map and the other in the Lie ideal that vanishes upon passage to the closed-surface setting.
Background: Johnson homomorphisms, Galois obstructions, and the Enomoto-Satoh trace
Let Σg,1 be a genus-g oriented surface with one boundary component. The action of the mapping class group Mg,1 on the free group π1(Σg,1) of rank $2g$ yields the Johnson filtration {Mg,1(k)}, and the k-th Johnson homomorphism τg,1Z(k) embeds the associated graded Lie algebra into g≥20, the graded Lie algebra of symplectic derivations of the free Lie algebra generated by g≥21. Two classical problems are to determine the image of g≥22 and to give a topological meaning to its cokernel.
Two objects address these problems from different directions. First, the Enomoto–Satoh trace map g≥23 vanishes identically on the Johnson image, hence detects cokernel elements (2608.17673). Second, Hain's graded arithmetic Johnson homomorphism injects the motivic Lie algebra g≥24 — free on generators g≥25 of degree g≥26 — into the g≥27-invariant part of the Johnson cokernel; its image consists of the Galois obstructions, whose existence was conjectured by Oda and proved by Nakamura, Matsumoto, and Takao, with injectivity resting on Brown's theorem. These elements are well-defined only up to nonzero scalar and modulo the Johnson image. Degree 6 is the first degree where the two theories meet: g≥28 is defined exactly in degrees matching the Galois obstructions.
A key structural fact, established via the Goldman–Turaev framework of Kawazumi–Kuno and Alekseev–Kawazumi–Kuno–Naef as surveyed in Hain's work, is that the Turaev cobracket kernel coincides with the kernel of the Enomoto–Satoh trace map; since the Turaev cobracket of g≥29 is nontrivial for all Σg,10 and Σg,11, one has Σg,12. The present paper makes this nontriviality explicit in the first case Σg,13.
Main results
Prior results of the authors give a short exact sequence
Σg,14
with Σg,15 (Σg,16) or Σg,17 (Σg,18), and a direct sum decomposition
Σg,19
where g0 is the ideal vanishing under projection to the pointed closed surface. The arithmetic Johnson map descends to g1, so the first Galois obstruction lies in g2, and its g3-component must be a nonzero scalar multiple of an "extra element" g4 completing the Johnson basis.
The main theorem gives, for the normalized basis g5 (with g6 at g7):
g8
where
g9
and Mg,10. The two summands differ fundamentally in character: Mg,11 is written in normalized (i-stable) coordinates while Mg,12 is written in ordinary (p-stable) coordinates.
The second theorem computes the trace value:
Mg,13
where Mg,14 are the multi-contraction components corresponding to the permutations Mg,15 and Mg,16. Since Mg,17, this ratio is entirely determined by the correction term Mg,18. This ratio is well-defined because both the obstruction's projective ambiguity and the vanishing of Mg,19 on the Johnson image leave the projective class of π1(Σg,1)0 invariant. A consequence is that the entire nontriviality of π1(Σg,1)1 on the first Galois obstruction arises through the ideal π1(Σg,1)2: passing to the quotient by this ideal, π1(Σg,1)3 and the normalizer π1(Σg,1)4 coincide.
Method
The proof exploits Hain's observation that the Galois obstructions normalize the extended Johnson image. In the semidirect product π1(Σg,1)5, the normalizer π1(Σg,1)6 is a trivial π1(Σg,1)7-module, and π1(Σg,1)8 is generated by π1(Σg,1)9.
The authors construct a basis of $2g$0 using tabulated values of $2g$1 on the chord-diagram basis for genera $2g$2; dividing by Casimir eigenvalues produces genus-independent values on the normalized basis, which identifies the extra element $2g$3.
To measure the failure of $2g$4 to normalize the Johnson image, they analyze the $2g$5- and $2g$6-isotypical parts of $2g$7. Using explicit detectors $2g$8, they establish exact sequences showing that the $2g$9-component of the degree-7 Johnson image is {Mg,1(k)}0, the {Mg,1(k)}1-component is {Mg,1(k)}2, and {Mg,1(k)}3 contains one additional copy of each, contained in {Mg,1(k)}4. This yields seven detecting functionals {Mg,1(k)}5 on {Mg,1(k)}6: membership of {Mg,1(k)}7 in {Mg,1(k)}8 is equivalent to {Mg,1(k)}9, and normalization of the Johnson image further requires k0.
A central technical step proves that all these functionals are polynomials in k1 of degree at most 3, so four computed genera determine them universally. This rests on an explicit combinatorial identity showing that brackets of highest-weight vectors with arbitrary linear-chord-diagram tensors reduce to permutations of fixed tensors, combined with the fact that triple contractions of k2 are monomials of degree k3 in k4. Direct evaluation then gives
k5
so that k6 kills both functionals and therefore normalizes the Johnson image; uniqueness up to scalar and addition of Johnson-image elements identifies it with k7.
It should be noted that the identification of k8 across genera via chord diagrams is used throughout, and that the polynomiality argument relies on computer-assisted computation (Mathematica) for five genera together with the Vandermonde interpolation principle; the paper also concedes that the case k9 requires separate treatment since τg,1Z(k)0 vanishes and some functionals are undefined there, though the argument adapts with minor modification.
Open questions raised
The paper poses several specific problems. Whether the Turaev cobracket of the correction term τg,1Z(k)1 can be computed directly is left open. More significantly, the authors define a reduced Enomoto–Satoh trace map τg,1Z(k)2 on the closed-surface target and conjecture that τg,1Z(k)3 for all τg,1Z(k)4 and τg,1Z(k)5 — verified here for τg,1Z(k)6. If true, no known obstruction currently distinguishes the arithmetic Johnson image from the geometric Johnson image over closed surfaces, and the meaning of the τg,1Z(k)7-valued "correction term" would require interpretation. Further open questions concern the relation among τg,1Z(k)8 across genera for fixed τg,1Z(k)9, and effective methods for computing the abelianization g≥200, noting that any abelianization class outside g≥201 must come from the Johnson cokernel.
Conclusion
This paper provides the first explicit representative of a Galois obstruction inside the Johnson cokernel of the boundary mapping class group, valid for all g≥202. The decomposition g≥203 separates an i-stable term detected by the Enomoto–Satoh trace machinery from a p-stable correction living in the boundary-killing ideal, and the exact ratio g≥204 pins down the trace value completely. The result suggests, but does not prove, that after reducing modulo g≥205 all Galois obstructions lie in the kernel of the Enomoto–Satoh trace map — a question whose resolution would clarify whether new obstructions are needed to detect arithmetic phenomena in the closed-surface Johnson cokernel.