Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

New constructions of optimal arrangements of $2d$ lines in Cd\mathbb{C}^d

Published 17 Aug 2026 in math.CO, math.FA, and math.MG | (2608.16116v1)

Abstract: In this paper we provide new constructions of equiangular tight frames of size $2d$ in C<sup>d\mathbb{C}<sup>d. We generalize the doubling construction of Fallon and Iverson to a tensor multiplication construction based on a suitable pair consisting of a complex Hadamard matrix and an equiangular tight frame. In particular, such a pair always exists whenever there is an amicable pair of real Hadamard matrices. Most notably, amicable Hadamard pairs of order q+1q+1 exist for all prime powers q3(mod4)q\equiv 3\pmod 4. We also find specific constructions based on a family of pairs of order 6 and on pairs whose equiangular tight frames are defined by Paley conference matrices with q1(mod4)q\equiv 1\pmod 4. Finally, we provide a power construction of equiangular tight frames that generalizes the construction of Turyn for conference matrices.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces ETF-amicable pairs, a Kronecker-product framework that combines complex Hadamard matrices with ETF signature matrices to generate new equiangular tight frames.
  • The constructions produce previously unknown optimal packings, including explicit ETFs in dimensions 93 and 105, and provide infinite families linked to Paley conference matrices and amicable Hadamard pairs.
  • The paper extends Turyn’s power construction to ETF cores, while proving that the multiplying method is restricted to signature parameters c=0 or c=±2 and does not resolve the general doubling conjecture.

This paper develops new multiplicative constructions of equiangular tight frames (ETFs) of size d×2dd\times 2d in Cd\mathbb{C}^d, generalizing both the doubling construction of Fallon and Iverson and Turyn's power construction for conference matrices. The central object is a new notion of an "ETF-amicable pair" of matrices, which couples a Hermitian complex Hadamard matrix with a signature matrix of an ETF; the paper shows such pairs arise from amicable Hadamard pairs, from explicit one-parameter families of order 6, and from Paley conference matrices, yielding many previously unknown dimensions in which optimal line packings exist.

Background: ETFs and signature matrices

An ETF of size d×Nd\times N is a set of NN unit vectors in Cd\mathbb{C}^d attaining the Welch bound on coherence,

xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},

and thus constitutes an optimal packing of NN lines in CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}. Following Holmes and Paulsen, an ETF is encoded by its signature matrix SS, defined by G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S where Cd\mathbb{C}^d0 is the Gram matrix and Cd\mathbb{C}^d1 the Welch-bond coherence. The Holmes–Paulsen criterion states that Cd\mathbb{C}^d2 is a signature matrix of a Cd\mathbb{C}^d3 ETF if and only if Cd\mathbb{C}^d4 has zero diagonal and unimodular off-diagonal entries and satisfies

Cd\mathbb{C}^d5

The case Cd\mathbb{C}^d6 forces Cd\mathbb{C}^d7, so Cd\mathbb{C}^d8, connecting these ETFs directly to Hadamard and conference matrices. The Fallon–Iverson conjecture asserts that a Cd\mathbb{C}^d9 ETF exists for every d×Nd\times N0; it has been verified computationally up to d×Nd\times N1, with explicit constructions known for all d×Nd\times N2 except d×Nd\times N3.

The Kronecker multiplication construction

The main structural contribution is the notion of an ETF-amicable pair: a pair d×Nd\times N4 of d×Nd\times N5 matrices where d×Nd\times N6 is a Hermitian complex Hadamard matrix, d×Nd\times N7 is a signature d×Nd\times N8-matrix, and

d×Nd\times N9

for some real constant NN0. The key theorem states that if NN1 is ETF-amicable with parameter NN2 and NN3 is any signature NN4-matrix, then

NN5

is a signature NN6-matrix. The proof is a direct verification of the quadratic condition using NN7, NN8, and NN9.

For order-2 amicable pairs, this construction recovers exactly the doubling construction of Fallon and Iverson, which produces an Cd\mathbb{C}^d0 ETF from any ETF with Cd\mathbb{C}^d1. The author notes that the apparent extra freedom in choosing the order-2 pair collapses under Seidel equivalence: different pairs with the same value of Cd\mathbb{C}^d2 yield switching-equivalent frames.

Consequences via amicable Hadamard pairs

Taking Cd\mathbb{C}^d3, the construction gives: if Cd\mathbb{C}^d4 is a Hermitian complex Hadamard matrix of order Cd\mathbb{C}^d5 and Cd\mathbb{C}^d6 is the signature matrix of an Cd\mathbb{C}^d7 ETF with Cd\mathbb{C}^d8, then existence of a Cd\mathbb{C}^d9 ETF implies existence of a xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},0 ETF. The anticommutation condition xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},1 is supplied by amicable pairs of Hadamard matrices — a symmetric Hadamard matrix paired with a skew Hadamard matrix satisfying xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},2. Setting xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},3 and xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},4 (where xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},5 is skew) verifies the condition algebraically. Consequently:

  • Amicable Hadamard pairs of order xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},6 exist for all prime powers xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},7, so whenever a xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},8 ETF exists, so does one at dimension multiplied by xi,xj2Ndd(N1),|\langle x_i,x_j\rangle|^2 \ge \frac{N-d}{d(N-1)},9.
  • More generally, by Seberry's catalogue of amicable pairs, multiplication factors include NN0, NN1 for prime powers NN2, NN3 when circulant Hadamard cores of order NN4 exist, and arbitrary products thereof.

Since complex Hadamard matrices exist in every order but amicable real pairs do not, the restriction to amicable pairs is a genuine constraint inherited from the classical design-theoretic setting; conjecturally, amicable pairs exist for all orders divisible by 4, which would make the multiplier construction essentially unconditional.

Explicit families

Two explicit families of ETF-amicable pairs are presented, both found initially with computational/AI assistance and then verified or generalized analytically.

Order 6. A one-parameter family NN5, NN6, built on Et-Taoui's family of complex conference matrices of order 6 satisfies NN7, NN8, and NN9. Combined with Strohmer's ETFs of signature CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}0 arising from skew Hadamard matrices of order CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}1, this yields a CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}2 ETF whenever a skew Hadamard matrix of order CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}3 exists. Via Paley's construction this confirms the doubling conjecture for all CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}4 with CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}5; notably, it supplies an explicit construction at CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}6, one of the four gaps below dimension 150 in prior tables. The remaining gap CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}7 follows from Goethals and Seidel's skew Hadamard matrix of order 36.

Orders CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}8 for CPd1\mathbb{CP}^{d-1}9. For the symmetric Paley conference matrix SS0 of order SS1, indexed by the projective line SS2, the author constructs a fixed-point-free involution SS3 (for nonsquare SS4) together with signs SS5, producing a signed permutation matrix SS6 with SS7, SS8, and SS9. Setting G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S0 yields a Hermitian complex Hadamard matrix anticommuting with G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S1. This gives a G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S2 ETF from any G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S3 ETF. The author remarks that the underlying mechanism — a Hermitian monomial involution G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S4 with G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S5 applied as G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S6 — plausibly extends to other structured frames such as harmonic frames, though this is left unverified.

The power construction

The second half of the paper adapts Turyn's power construction for conference matrices to ETF cores. A core G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S7 of a G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S8 ETF (the standard-form signature matrix with first row and column removed) is characterized by: Hermitian, zero diagonal, unimodular off-diagonal entries, G=I+αSG = I + \alpha S9, and Cd\mathbb{C}^d00.

For Cd\mathbb{C}^d01, the core Cd\mathbb{C}^d02 of a Cd\mathbb{C}^d03 ETF is built from a core of a Cd\mathbb{C}^d04 ETF. For general exponents, define strings over the alphabet Cd\mathbb{C}^d05 in which every Cd\mathbb{C}^d06 is followed by a Cd\mathbb{C}^d07 and vice versa (cyclically), and set Cd\mathbb{C}^d08 over all such strings of length Cd\mathbb{C}^d09, where Cd\mathbb{C}^d10 is the corresponding Kronecker product. The combinatorial heart of the proof is a uniqueness lemma: every 0/1-sequence of length Cd\mathbb{C}^d11 (except the all-ones sequence) corresponds to exactly one string, which forces cross terms Cd\mathbb{C}^d12 to vanish for distinct strings and makes cancellation of unwanted Cd\mathbb{C}^d13-products exact. The result is that Cd\mathbb{C}^d14, giving:

If a Cd\mathbb{C}^d15 ETF exists, then a Cd\mathbb{C}^d16 ETF exists for every Cd\mathbb{C}^d17.

Combined with Paley conference matrices, this covers dimensions of the form Cd\mathbb{C}^d18 beyond what doubling alone provides.

Limitations and open questions

The paper is candid about the scope of its methods. A spectral argument shows that ETF-amicable pairs exist only for Cd\mathbb{C}^d19 or Cd\mathbb{C}^d20: writing Cd\mathbb{C}^d21 in the eigenbasis of Cd\mathbb{C}^d22 forces either equal eigenspace multiplicities (hence trace zero, so Cd\mathbb{C}^d23) or block-diagonal Cd\mathbb{C}^d24 proportional to Cd\mathbb{C}^d25, which is unimodular only when Cd\mathbb{C}^d26 and corresponds precisely to Hermitian Hadamard matrices with constant diagonal. Thus the multiplying construction cannot be extended to generic signature parameters. One-parameter amicable families are known only for Cd\mathbb{C}^d27 and Cd\mathbb{C}^d28; the analogous families of orders 10 and 14 from Et-Taoui's work do not appear to yield amicable pairs. It also remains open whether the order-6 construction at Cd\mathbb{C}^d29 is inequivalent to the general Cd\mathbb{C}^d30 construction at Cd\mathbb{C}^d31 (numerical evidence suggests it is). Finally, whether the multiplying or power constructions can produce 2-circulant ETFs — the object of the medium version of the doubling conjecture — is unresolved, as is the conjecture itself for general Cd\mathbb{C}^d32.

Conclusion

The paper substantially enlarges the supply of known Cd\mathbb{C}^d33 ETFs by introducing ETF-amicable pairs as a flexible algebraic interface between complex Hadamard theory and frame theory. The framework subsumes the Fallon–Iverson doubling construction, connects to classical amicable Hadamard pairs, resolves two of the four missing explicit dimensions below 150 (Cd\mathbb{C}^d34 and Cd\mathbb{C}^d35), and transfers Turyn's power construction wholesale to the ETF setting. Its reach is bounded by the classification of amicable pairs to Cd\mathbb{C}^d36 and by the availability of structured Hadamard and conference matrices, leaving the full doubling conjecture open.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.