Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the Gap of Finite Posets

Published 13 Aug 2026 in math.CO and cs.DM | (2608.12678v1)

Abstract: Let PP be a finite nonempty poset with nn elements, let f:P1,,nf:P\to{1,\ldots,n} be a uniformly random order-preserving bijection, and put hP(x)=E[f(x)]h_P(x)=\mathbb E[f(x)]. Define gap(P)\operatorname{gap}(P) as the largest difference between consecutive values in the ordered list consisting of $0$, n+1n+1, and all the expected ranks hP(x)h_P(x). Write w(P)w(P) for the largest size of a pairwise incomparable subset. We prove three results. The first proves an old conjectural relation between width and expected-rank gaps that has appeared repeatedly, in increasingly general forms, in work of Brightwell and Trotter (2002), Biró and Trotter (2011), and Aires and Kahn (2025): gap(P)2w(P)1\operatorname{gap}(P)\le 2w(P)-1. Second, for every $L&gt;0$ we construct a width-two poset such that every maximal chain has an expected-rank gap of at least LL, where the two endpoint spacings are included when computing this gap. Finally, for every rNr\in\mathbb N, we construct a poset PrP_r for which the relative order induced on every nonempty selected set XX has base-two entropy below $3|X|$, while gap(Pr)(3/2)<sup>r\operatorname{gap}(P_r)\ge(3/2)<sup>r. Thus the gap can be arbitrarily large while the induced order on every selected set has relatively small entropy. The key ideas behind all three results were found by ChatGPT 5.6 Sol.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.