Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Powers and trace of symmetric powers of 2×22\times 2 matrices and combinatorial, Fibonacci and Lucas identities

Published 6 Jul 2026 in math.CO | (2607.05589v1)

Abstract: Let AA be an arbitrary 2×22\times 2 matrix. In \cite{Cisneros:PhD,Cisneros:I2x2M} I gave a formula for the trace of the kk-th symmetric power of AA in terms of the anti-diagonal entries of A<sup>k+1A<sup>{k+1} and AA. This was based on formulae that I found for the entries of the kk-th power A<sup>kA<sup>k of the matrix AA in terms of its entries but I only sketched the idea of how I obtained such formulae. In this article I give the full proof of those formulae by counting some walks of length kk over the complete digraph of order $2$. I compare them with formulae for A<sup>kA<sup>k given by Mc Laughlin in \cite{McLaughlin:CIDnP2x2M} and by Williams in \cite{Williams:nthP2x2M}. This leads to combinatorial identities, in particular expressions for Fibonacci and Lucas numbers.

Summary

  • The paper derives explicit closed-form expressions for the entries of A^n, linking matrix powers to combinatorial path enumeration.
  • It rigorously compares novel formulas with classical results, showing their algebraic equivalence via trace and symmetry methods.
  • The paper uncovers connections between symmetric power traces and number sequences, yielding new Fibonacci and Lucas identities with practical computational implications.

Powers and Symmetric Powers of 2×22\times 2 Matrices: Trace Formulas and Combinatorial Connections

Introduction and Motivation

This work provides a thorough algebraic and combinatorial analysis of the powers and symmetric powers of arbitrary 2×22\times2 complex matrices. It develops explicit formulae for individual entries of AnA^n in terms of the entries of AA, ultimately establishing a profound connection between these matrix powers and classical combinatorial sequences, notably the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Leveraging the combinatorics of paths in digraphs, the article rigorously proves results that previously appeared only as sketches or folklore, systematically comparing distinct formulas from the literature and using this framework to derive new and classical combinatorial identities.

Explicit Formulas for AnA^n and Combinatorial Interpretations

The main technical achievement is the derivation of explicit closed-form expressions for all entries of AnA^n for arbitrary A=abcdA={a}{b}{c}{d}, with

An=(anbn cndn).A^n = \begin{pmatrix} a_n & b_n \ c_n & d_n \end{pmatrix}.

Each entry, such as ana_n, is expressed as a double sum involving binomial coefficients: an=an+∑s=1⌊n/2⌋∑m=0n−2s(n−s−ms)(m+s−1m)an−2s−mbscsdm,a_n = a^n + \sum_{s=1}^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor} \sum_{m=0}^{n-2s} \binom{n-s-m}{s}\binom{m+s-1}{m} a^{n-2s-m} b^s c^s d^m, analogous expressions hold for 2×22\times20, 2×22\times21, and 2×22\times22, with their own combinatorial structures.

The derivation is based on interpreting the recursion relations among the entries of 2×22\times23 as walks of length 2×22\times24 on the complete digraph of order 2. Each term in the sum corresponds to walks with specified visitation numbers to loops and arcs, with coefficients tracing the count of such walks. This interpretation underpins the subsequent combinatorial identities and illuminates the structural symmetries between 2×22\times25 and 2×22\times26.

Comparison with Alternative Formulae

The paper meticulously compares these novel explicit expressions with classical results such as:

  • Mc Laughlin's formula [McLaughlin 2004]: Expresses 2×22\times27 via a generalized binomial sum 2×22\times28, involving the trace and determinant:

2×22\times29

such that

AnA^n0

  • Williams' eigenvalue formula: Uses the eigenvalues AnA^n1 of AnA^n2 to directly express AnA^n3 in terms of AnA^n4 and the identity, with coefficients reflecting the structure of symmetric polynomials in AnA^n5.

The article clarifies that all these formulations are algebraically equivalent due to the Cayley-Hamilton theorem and elementary properties of AnA^n6 matrices, and it explicitly demonstrates the transformations relating the formulas.

Trace of Symmetric Powers and Invariance Properties

A central insight is the identification and exploitation of the AnA^n7-th symmetric power action, AnA^n8, on homogeneous degree-AnA^n9 polynomials, and in particular, computation of AA0 via both combinatorial means and in terms of certain anti-diagonal entry ratios in powers of AA1: AA2 This quotient is shown to be invariant under conjugation of AA3, a property not generally shared by other entry-based ratios, and furnishes an explicit link between matrix theory and symmetric function theory.

Furthermore, the entries of AA4 are reconstructed from the traces of the symmetric powers: AA5 These relationships facilitate the derivation of a host of combinatorial and number-theoretic identities.

Combinatorial, Fibonacci, and Lucas Identities

From the established formulas, a wealth of combinatorial identities are extracted, many involving binomial coefficients and path-counting arguments, such as: AA6 Moreover, identities connecting convolutions of binomial coefficients to the Fibonacci and Lucas sequences are obtained by specializing AA7 to appropriate companion matrices. For instance, the trace formula yields: AA8 with explicit sum expressions matching classical forms and Binet’s formula, but now as consequences of symmetric representation theory.

The invariant property of the trace of symmetric powers under conjugation of AA9 leads to infinite families of expressions for AnA^n0 parameterized by invertible changes of basis.

Analogous formulas are developed for Lucas numbers and for variations of the Fibonacci sequence involving even indices, incorporating entries with powers of AnA^n1 or AnA^n2, depending on the specific matrix realization.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

This unified framework interlinks combinatorial path enumeration, linear algebraic powers, symmetric tensor representation theory, and number theory. The explicit forms not only clarify the algebraic structure underpinning classical sequences like Fibonacci and Lucas but also provide algorithmically efficient means to compute high powers of AnA^n3 matrices. The combinatorial insights enhance the understanding of walk enumeration on small graphs and could extend to transfer-matrix methods and spectral techniques in combinatorics.

The symmetry observed in the trace of symmetric powers suggests possible extensions to higher-dimensional analogues, though the combinatorial complexity scales rapidly for AnA^n4.

On a practical level, these results have direct implications for computational mathematics, algorithms requiring fast computation of matrix powers, and symbolic computation in algebraic combinatorics.

Conclusion

The paper rigorously establishes and proves explicit formulas for the entries and symmetric power traces of arbitrary AnA^n5 matrices, situating these results within a strong combinatorial and representation-theoretic context. The equivalence and comparison with classic formulas from Mc Laughlin and Williams are clarified, and the transfer of these results to combinatorial identities—including many for Fibonacci and Lucas numbers—is thoroughly developed. These contributions furnish a comprehensive toolkit for researchers working at the interface of linear algebra, combinatorics, and number theory, and open avenues for future exploration in higher rank settings and other combinatorial matrix analytic contexts.


Reference: "Powers and trace of symmetric powers of AnA^n6 matrices and combinatorial, Fibonacci and Lucas identities" (2607.05589)

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.