- The paper constructs, for every dimension n≥2, an explicit K-polystable toric Q-Fano variety with alpha invariant exactly 2/(2n+1), strictly between 1/(n+1) and 1/n.
- The authors use a combinatorial dual-polytope construction, proving the required vertex structure, lattice primitivity, origin-centered barycenter, and extremal pairing that determines the invariant.
- The result confirms that Tian’s criterion cannot be uniformly strengthened for singular Q-Fano varieties, while leaving open whether smaller values occur and whether Jiang’s conjecture holds for smooth Fano manifolds.
The paper constructs, for every dimension n≥2, an explicit n-dimensional toric Q-Fano variety Xn that is K-polystable and whose alpha invariant equals exactly 2n+12 (2607.04005). This value lies strictly between the sharp lower bound n+11 for K-semistable Fano varieties and n1, thereby answering affirmatively a question of Liu and Zhuang on the sharpness of Tian's criterion.
Background and motivation
For a Q-Fano variety X, the alpha invariant (global log canonical threshold) is defined as
α(X)=inf{lct(X;D)∣D∼Q−KX, D≥0}.
Tian's criterion states that an n0-dimensional Fano variety with n1 (respectively n2) is K-stable (respectively K-semistable). Fujita and Odaka established the lower bound n3 for K-semistable n4-Fano varieties of dimension n5, and this is sharp: n6 attains exactly n7. Jiang showed moreover that n8 is the only K-semistable Fano manifold achieving this minimum, and proposed the conjecture that a K-semistable Fano manifold with n9 must be Q0. Liu and Zhuang reformulated this as a question: does there exist an Q1-dimensional K-semistable Q2-Fano variety with
Q3
An affirmative answer shows that no strengthening of Tian's criterion with a uniform threshold above Q4 can hold for singular varieties, since the constructed examples are K-*poly*stable yet have alpha invariant Q5 for all Q6.
The dual polytope construction
The construction is purely combinatorial. Working in the dual lattices
Q7
the paper defines, with Q8, the points
Q9
and sets Xn0, with Xn1 the polar polytope. The key technical device is the cyclic difference coordinate map Xn2 with Xn3, which identifies Xn4 with the zero-sum lattice and converts Xn5 into the transparent hyperplane slice
Xn6
The combinatorial core is then established by elementary but careful arguments:
- Vertices: Xn7 has exactly Xn8 vertices, namely the points Xn9 (indexed by ordered pairs 2n+120) with difference coordinates 2n+121, 2n+122, and 2n+123 otherwise. The proof hinges on the number-theoretic fact that 2n+124, which rules out all coordinates being endpoints of the box.
- Primitivity: each 2n+125 is a primitive lattice point, so these are genuine ray generators of a smooth-in-codimension-one sense fan.
- Barycenter: the cyclic coordinate permutation preserves 2n+126 and its only fixed point is 2n+127, forcing the barycenter of 2n+128 to be the origin.
- Extremal pairing: 2n+129, attained at n+110 against n+111.
The toric n+112-Fano variety
Taking n+113 as the face fan of n+114 and n+115, the ray generators are the vertices n+116, the anticanonical divisor is n+117, and the anticanonical polytope is exactly n+118. The paper verifies that n+119 is n10-Cartier via the facet supporting functions, ample since n11 is bounded and full-dimensional, and that n12 is klt since every nonzero n13 in a maximal cone has positive log discrepancy. Thus n14 is an n15-dimensional toric n16-Fano variety.
K-polystability and alpha invariant
Two standard results then finish the argument. By Berman's toric criterion, K-polystability of a toric n17-Fano variety is equivalent to the barycenter of the anticanonical polytope being the origin; since n18, n19 is K-polystable, hence K-semistable. By the Blum–Jonsson toric formula,
Q0
and the extremal pairing Q1 yields
Q2
Since Q3 for all Q4 (indeed Q5 and Q6), the main theorem follows: for every Q7 there exists a K-polystable toric Q8-Fano variety of dimension Q9 with alpha invariant exactly X0.
Limitations and open questions
The examples are necessarily singular, so Jiang's conjecture for K-semistable Fano manifolds remains untouched; the paper explicitly notes that the conjecture may still hold. The paper also makes no claim regarding part (2) of the Liu–Zhuang question. The natural refinement posed is whether the value X1 is itself optimal: does there exist a K-semistable X2-Fano variety of dimension X3 with
X4
The paper notes, as a limitation of the automated systems involved, that some related references in the literature may have been missed. It is also worth recording, as the authors do, that the proof sketch was obtained by ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and subsequently verified and written up with the assistance of the Danus system built on the Rethlas framework, with human verification and polishing.
Conclusion
The paper settles a question on the sharpness of Tian's criterion by giving an explicit, fully combinatorial family of K-polystable toric X5-Fano varieties X6 with X7 for every X8. The construction demonstrates that the gap between the Fujita–Odaka lower bound X9 and Tian's threshold α(X)=inf{lct(X;D)∣D∼Q−KX, D≥0}.0 is populated by K-polystable examples, while leaving open both the manifold version of the phenomenon and the optimality of the value α(X)=inf{lct(X;D)∣D∼Q−KX, D≥0}.1 within the interval.