Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

JETO-Bench: A Reproducible Benchmark for Execution Time Improvement Patches in Java

Published 30 Jun 2026 in cs.SE | (2606.31767v1)

Abstract: Automated fixing of performance issues is gaining increasing attention. However, existing benchmarks of execution time improvement patches are fixed datasets that target Python, C++, or .NET and cannot be extended to new patches according to user-defined configurations. In this paper, we present JETO-Mine, the first configurable and reusable tool for automatically creating reproducible benchmarks of execution time improvement patches (ETIPs) in real-world Java projects. JETO-Mine employs a three-phase pipeline: a static analysis phase that crawls GitHub repositories and identifies ETIPs using user-defined filters and an LLM-based issue classifier, a dynamic analysis phase that wraps the identified ETIPs in Docker images for fully reproducible execution and performs statistical testing to find objective evidence of execution time improvement, and an evaluation harness that enables quantitative assessment of both generated patches and generated tests. Unlike existing benchmarks, JETO-Mine is designed as a reusable tool that allows researchers continuously collect new benchmarks with their own desired filters and statistical rigor levels. We use JETO-Mine to build JETO-Bench, a benchmark of 660 identified ETIPs and 91 manually verified executable ETIPs collected from 174 open-source Java repositories. To build JETO-Bench, JETO-Mine scans 11 years of open-source development history and nearly 1.8 million commits. We run OpenHands, a leading open-source coding agent, on the 91 manually verified executable ETIPs in JETO-Bench and find that it correctly fixes 14.3% (13/91) of the issues, aligning with results reported by similar studies on other programming languages. Our results also reveal that open-source Java projects largely lack tests that demonstrate execution time improvements, presenting an opportunity for future research in test generation.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.