Quasi-F-singularities and singularities in birational geometry
Abstract: We give an overview of the theory of quasi-F-singularities, focusing on their connection with singularities in birational geometry.
- Quasi-F-splittings in birational geometry III (2024)
- Explicit Birational Geometry of Fano threefold complete intersections (2023)
- Rational singularities and $q$-birational morphism (2023)
- Quasi-F-splittings in birational geometry (2022)
- Birational geometry of singular Fano double spaces of index two (2019)
- Birational geometry of algebraic varieties (2017)
- Birational geometry of del Pezzo fibrations with terminal quotient singularities (2016)
- $F$-singularities: applications of characteristic $p$ methods to singularity theory (2014)
- On Semirational Singularities (2014)
- Positivity, singularities, and boundedness (2025)
Summary
- The paper introduces quasi-F-singularities as a refined extension of classical F-singularity notions, effectively bridging Frobenius methods with birational singularity types.
- It develops explicit criteria and analyzes deformation properties using Witt vectors and Fedder-type methods, which accurately assess klt, lc, and pseudo-rational behaviors.
- The study establishes sharp numerical bounds and equivalences for surface and threefold singularities, offering actionable insights for the minimal model program in positive characteristic.
Quasi-F-Singularities and Their Connections to Birational Geometry
Overview and Motivation
The theory of F-singularities, formulated via the Frobenius endomorphism in positive characteristic, has established deep connections with the classification of singularities in birational geometry, including klt (Kawamata log terminal), lc (log canonical), rational, and Du Bois singularities. However, classical F-singularities such as F-purity and F-regularity are often too rigid to detect subtler birational phenomena, especially in low dimensions or for singularities failing to be F-split.
Recent developments have introduced the notion of quasi-F-singularities—generalizations of F-singularities leveraging the structure of Witt vectors and new pushout constructions—to broaden the scope of Frobenius-based methods in birational geometry. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of quasi-F-singularities, their deformation properties, their precise relationship to singularities in the minimal model program, and their effective criteria in the hypersurface setting.
Background: F-Singularities and Birational Geometry
F0-singularities are defined using the behavior of the Frobenius endomorphism on local or module structures. The four fundamental classes—F1-regular, F2-pure, F3-rational, and F4-injective—are connected, via deep theorems ([Smith97], [hw02], [Schwede09_2]), to corresponding classes in characteristic zero:
- F5-regular F6 klt
- F7-pure F8 lc
- F9-rational F0 pseudo-rational
- Cohen-Macaulay F1-injective F2 pseudo-Du Bois
However, these implications are strict; the converse fail even for surface singularities. For example, cones over supersingular elliptic curves are lc but not F3-pure ([Fedder83]).
Quasi-F4-Singularities: Definition and Fundamental Properties
Motivations and Construction
The original impetus for quasi-F5-splitting arose in Yobuko's work on liftability of Calabi-Yau varieties and extended by Nakkajima–Yobuko to Kodaira-type vanishing theorems ([yobuko19], [NY21]). The formalism centers on modules and endomorphisms over truncated Witt vector rings F6, incorporating a pushout F7 of the Frobenius and restriction maps. A local ring F8 is defined to be F9-quasi-F0-split if F1 splits as a (Witt module) homomorphism.
The systematic study ([KTTWYY1]–[KTTWYY3], [TWY]) has introduced variants of quasi-F2-singularities: quasi-F3-split, quasi-F4-regular, quasi-F5-rational, and quasi-F6-injective, paralleling but extending the classical classes. Notably, for Gorenstein and surface singularities, quasi-F7-splitting coincides with quasi-F8-splitting ([KTTWYY3]).
Connections with Birational Singularity Classes
Quasi-F9-singularities align much more closely with standard birational singularities than classical F0-singularities. The main results include:
- Quasi-F1-regular implies klt, and the converse holds in dimension two. For F2-Gorenstein surface singularities, being klt is equivalent to being quasi-F3-regular ([KTTWYY3]).
- Quasi-F4-split implies lc, with equivalence for surfaces of residue characteristic F5 ([STY]).
- Quasi-F6-rational implies pseudo-rational, and in dimension two (again, under mild conditions), the converse also holds ([KTTWYY3]).
- Quasi-F7-injective implies pseudo-Du Bois; if the residue field is perfect, the converse holds in dimension two.
These results are precise: for instance, while F8-purity is not equivalent to lc even in surfaces, quasi-F9-splitting bridges this gap.
Deformation and Inversion of Adjunction
Deformation properties are central in the minimal model program. Classical F0-regularity and F1-purity do not generally deform, but F2-rationality and F3-injectivity do under Cohen-Macaulayness ([Fedder83], [HH94]). For quasi-F4-singularities, the deformation picture is subtler:
- Quasi-F5-rationality deforms under ambient quasi-F6-injectivity: If F7 forms a regular sequence, F8 quasi-F9-rational and F0 quasi-F1-injective F2 F3 is quasi-F4-rational.
- Quasi-F5-regularity, quasi-F6-splitting, and quasi-F7-injectivity do not deform in general, even for Gorenstein rings.
Higher Dimensional Perspectives and Sharpness
In dimension three, for F8-factorial klt singularities over a perfect field of characteristic F9, the singularity is quasi-F0-regular ([KTTWYY2]), and this lower bound is sharp. However, for lc threefold singularities, one can construct lc but non-quasi-F1-split examples in all characteristics using cones over supersingular K3 or abelian surfaces. In dimension four and higher, the divergence widens further ([TY26]).
Explicit Hypersurface Criteria: Fedder-Type and Quasi-F2-Splitting Heights
The practical diagnosis of Frobenius properties often depends on explicit homological criteria, historically via Fedder's criterion for hypersurfaces. The paper extends these to quasi-F3-splitting via sequences of ideals F4, governed by Witt-theoretic analogues of the Frobenius trace and differential operators. The quasi-F5-split height is determined by containment of F6 in powers of the maximal ideal:
F7
Applications:
- Determination of log canonical singularities in characteristic zero via reduction and quasi-F8-splitting in positive characteristic.
- Computation of Artin–Mazur heights for Calabi-Yau complete intersections ([KTY22], [BGP]).
- Construction of varieties with arbitrary Artin–Mazur heights ([KTY25]).
Quasi-F9-Pure Thresholds
Quasi-F0-pure thresholds F1 interpolate between F2-pure thresholds and log canonical thresholds, refining the connection in dimension two:
F3
The paper provides explicit computation methods for these thresholds, extending Mustaţă–Takagi–Watanabe's approach to the quasi-F4 setting.
Theoretical and Practical Implications
Theoretically, quasi-F5-singularities yield a framework that more closely tracks the expected correspondence between Frobenius-based singularity theory and birational geometry than F6-singularities, particularly for low-dimensional, (quasi-)Gorenstein or F7-factorial cases. Their stability under quotient and completion, their compatibility with local cohomology, and the precise links with rational and Du Bois singularities, make quasi-F8-singularities a robust toolkit for furthering the minimal model program in positive characteristic.
Practically, the explicit criteria—Fedder-type, direct computations in the Witt vector setting—enable the construction and analysis of singularities otherwise inaccessible via classical F9-singularities, including the calibration of invariants such as singularity heights and thresholds relevant for lifting, vanishing, and degeneration problems.
Numerical Results and Contrasting Claims:
- Sharp bounds on F0 for threefold quasi-F1-regularity (F2).
- Counterexamples to deformation for quasi-F3-splitting in explicit Gorenstein hypersurfaces.
- Existence of Calabi-Yau varieties of arbitrary Artin–Mazur height over F4.
Open Problems and Future Directions
Key open questions include:
- Do normal quasi-F5-split singularities imply quasi-F6-injectivity for all F7?
- Are all quasi-F8-regular singularities Cohen-Macaulay beyond dimension three or without the F9-Gorenstein hypothesis?
- For regular local rings and F00, does F01 imply quasi-F02-splitness of F03?
These problems touch on subtle invariants of singularities and their relationships to the birational and arithmetic structure of algebraic varieties. Progress in this direction will clarify the landscape between Frobenius methods and geometric classification, with possible implications for liftability, deformation theory, and the behavior of cycles and cohomology in mixed and positive characteristic.
Conclusion
Quasi-F04-singularities represent a critical extension of the Frobenius-based approach to singularity theory in algebraic geometry, resolving known limitations of classical F05-singularities and furnishing refined correspondences with birational classification. Their robust properties, explicit criteria, and deep connections with both the structure of singularities and arithmetic invariants mark them as central objects of study for further advances in positive characteristic geometry and its applications to vanishing, extension, and lifting phenomena.
Paper to Video (Beta)
No one has generated a video about this paper yet.
Whiteboard
No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.
Top Community Prompts
Open Problems
We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.
Continue Learning
- How do quasi-F-singularities offer advantages over traditional F-singularities in detecting subtler birational phenomena?
- What are the key roles of Witt vectors and pushout constructions in the development of quasi-F-singularity theory?
- In what ways do the deformation properties of quasi-F-singularities differ from classical F-regularity and F-purity, particularly in Gorenstein rings?
- How do the explicit Fedder-type criteria and threshold computations enhance our understanding of singularities in hypersurface settings?
- Find recent papers about quasi-F-singularities.