Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Kolmogorov equations for stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations forced by Lévy Noise and its application to infinite horizon problems

Published 25 Jun 2026 in math.PR | (2606.27324v1)

Abstract: This article examines the Kolmogorov equation corresponding to the following stochastic two- and three-dimensional incompressible (u=0\nabla\cdot\boldsymbol{u}=0) convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations, also known as the damped Navier-Stokes equations, driven by Lévy noise on the torus: \begin{align*} \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{u}+[-μΔ\boldsymbol{u}+(\boldsymbol{u}\cdot\nabla)\boldsymbol{u}+α\boldsymbol{u}+β|\boldsymbol{u}|{r-1}\boldsymbol{u}+\nabla p]\mathrm{d} t =\sqrt{\mathrm{Q}}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{W}+\int_{Z}σ(t,z)\widetildeπ(\mathrm{d} t,\mathrm{d} z), \end{align*} where $μ,α,β&gt;0$ are physical constants; Q\mathrm{Q} is a non-negative, trace-class operator; W\mathrm{W} is a cylindrical Wiener process on a Hilbert space; σσ represents the jump-noise coefficient; (Z,B(Z))(Z,\mathscr{B}(Z)) is a measurable space; ππ is a time-homogeneous Poisson random measure; and π~\widetildeπ denotes its compensator. The main contribution of this work is the establishment of the essential mm-dissipativity of the corresponding Kolmogorov operator, a property that has received limited attention in the existing literature for systems driven by jump-type noise. \emph{Our main innovation is that, in contrast to traditional techniques which crucially depend on exponential moment estimates, we utilize the intrinsic structure of the absorption term αu+βu<sup>r1uα\boldsymbol{u}+β|\boldsymbol{u}|<sup>{r-1}\boldsymbol{u} to dispense with these requirements. This allows us to establish the essential mm-dissipativity of the Kolmogorov operator without the need for exponential moments.} We apply the developed framework to an infinite-horizon stochastic optimal control problem, demonstrating the solvability of the associated infinite-dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (integro-differential) equation.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper proves essential m-dissipativity of the SCBF Kolmogorov operator in L²(H,η) using invariant-measure moment bounds and Forchheimer coercivity instead of exponential moments.
  • The analysis derives a carré du champ identity with both Wiener-gradient and Lévy-jump dissipation, along with resolvent estimates and bounded-drift perturbation results.
  • The paper establishes a unique mild solution to the infinite-horizon HJB equation under a discount-dependent Lipschitz condition and identifies an optimal feedback control for quadratic costs.

This paper studies the Kolmogorov equation associated with the stochastic convective Brinkman–Forchheimer (SCBF) equations — the damped Navier–Stokes system on the two- and three-dimensional torus Td\mathbb{T}^d — driven by additive Lévy noise. The central result is the essential mm-dissipativity of the Kolmogorov operator in L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta), where HH is the solenoidal L2\mathrm{L}^2 space and η\eta the unique invariant measure of the transition semigroup. The analysis is then applied to an infinite-horizon stochastic optimal control problem, yielding existence and uniqueness of a mild solution to the associated infinite-dimensional Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) integro-differential equation.

Setting and model

The SCBF system under consideration reads, after projection onto divergence-free fields,

dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),

where A\mathcal{A} is the Stokes operator, B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y, and C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y) is the Forchheimer absorption term with exponent mm0. The noise consists of a trace-class Wiener perturbation satisfying mm1, plus a compensated Poisson random measure with intensity mm2. A notable technical point is that, unlike the Navier–Stokes case, zero-mean velocity fields are not assumed, since the absorption term does not preserve this property; consequently the Poincaré inequality is unavailable and the full mm3-norm must be used throughout.

The well-posedness framework is taken from prior work: for mm4 (and for mm5 under mm6), a pathwise unique strong solution exists with paths in mm7, together with an energy equality.

Invariant measure and key a-priori bounds

Existence of an invariant measure follows from energy estimates combined with the Krylov–Bogoliubov theorem via tightness of time-averaged laws. Uniqueness follows from exponential stability of solutions: for mm8 with mm9 (where L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)0), or L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)1 with L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)2, any two solutions satisfy L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)3 almost surely. This yields exponential mixing of the semigroup toward equilibrium.

The technically decisive estimate concerns moments of the invariant measure. For test functions L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)4, applying Itô's formula, using invariance (L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)5), and exploiting the identity L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)6 on the torus, the authors obtain, for all L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)7,

L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)8

with L2(H,η)\mathrm{L}^2(H,\eta)9 depending only on HH0, the jump-moment quantity HH1, and physical parameters. This bound on HH2 is precisely what earlier treatments of stochastic Navier–Stokes obtained through exponential moment estimates of the form HH3 and mixed exponential-interpolation integrals.

Essential HH4-dissipativity without exponential moments

The main theorem states that the Kolmogorov operator HH5, defined on the algebra of exponential functions HH6 by

HH7

is dissipative in HH8 and its closure coincides with the infinitesimal generator HH9 of the transition semigroup. The proof proceeds in three steps:

Extension. Via the infinite-dimensional Itô formula applied to L2\mathrm{L}^20, one shows L2\mathrm{L}^21 pointwise, and the invariant-measure bound above guarantees that difference quotients are equibounded in L2\mathrm{L}^22, so L2\mathrm{L}^23 extends L2\mathrm{L}^24.

Approximation. The nonlinearities are truncated at scale L2\mathrm{L}^25 in the L2\mathrm{L}^26-norm, producing smooth bounded coefficients L2\mathrm{L}^27, L2\mathrm{L}^28 whose resolvent problems are classically solvable. Derivative estimates for the resolvent follow from the exponential decay of the linearized flow, L2\mathrm{L}^29, which itself rests on the coercivity of the absorption term rather than on exponential integrability.

Perturbation vanishing. The truncation error terms satisfy, e.g., η\eta0, which requires η\eta1 and η\eta2. These are established case-by-case: in dimension three for η\eta3 via a weighted interpolation of η\eta4 norms with exponents chosen so that both factors fall within the available moment bounds (with η\eta5); for η\eta6 via an η\eta7-η\eta8 interpolation with η\eta9; and in dimension two via Gagliardo–Nirenberg. The Lumer–Phillips theorem then gives dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),0-dissipativity of the closure, and uniqueness of dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),1-dissipative extensions identifies it with dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),2.

Two structural restrictions deserve emphasis. First, the result requires dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),3 in two dimensions and dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),4 (plus the critical case dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),5 with dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),6) in three dimensions; the upper bound dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),7 in 3D arises from the interpolation argument controlling dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),8 against the available moments. Second, the authors explicitly note they cannot prove closability of dY(t)+[μAY(t)+B(Y(t))+αY(t)+βC(Y(t))]dt=QdW(t)+ZG(z)π(dt,dz),dY(t)+[\mu\mathcal{A}Y(t)+\mathfrak{B}(Y(t))+\alpha Y(t)+\beta\mathfrak{C}(Y(t))]\,dt=\sqrt{Q}\,dW(t)+\int_Z G(z)\,\pi(dt,dz),9 as an operator on A\mathcal{A}0, so the gradient term is controlled only along the extended domain A\mathcal{A}1.

Consequences: Carré du Champ identity and resolvent theory

From the main theorem the paper derives the identité du carré du champ for the integro-differential Kolmogorov operator:

A\mathcal{A}2

valid for all A\mathcal{A}3, with the accompanying bounds A\mathcal{A}4 and the analogous jump-difference bound. The jump contribution to this identity appears not to have been previously recorded in the literature on integro-differential Kolmogorov operators. Resolvent estimates follow directly: for A\mathcal{A}5,

A\mathcal{A}6

A perturbation result shows that for bounded Borel A\mathcal{A}7, the operator A\mathcal{A}8 has resolvent containing A\mathcal{A}9, obtained by a contraction argument on B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y0, whose norm is bounded by B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y1. Semigroup identities of the form B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y2 extend by density to all of B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y3.

Application to infinite-horizon optimal control

The framework is applied to the controlled SCBF system with control entering through B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y4, constrained to the ball of radius B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y5, minimizing the discounted cost B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y6. Dynamic programming leads to the stationary HJB equation

B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y7

where B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y8 is the Legendre transform of the running control cost B(y)=(y)y\mathfrak{B}(y)=(y\cdot\nabla)y9. Because C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)0 is not closed, the equation is interpreted through its closure, i.e., with C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)1 in place of C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)2, and solved in the mild sense via the resolvent fixed-point formulation C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)3.

The main solvability theorem asserts that if C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)4 is Lipschitz continuous and C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)5, then for discount factors satisfying C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)6, the HJB equation admits a unique mild solution, constructed by Banach's fixed point theorem on the product space C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)7 using the resolvent estimates above. In the appendix, for the quadratic running cost C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)8 inside the ball and C(y)=P(yr1y)\mathfrak{C}(y)=\mathscr{P}(|y|^{r-1}y)9 outside, an explicit verification argument yields existence of an optimal pair with feedback law mm00 when mm01, saturated at norm mm02 otherwise, and optimal cost equal to the value function mm03.

Limitations and open questions

Several qualifications attach to these results. The essential mm04-dissipativity theorem covers only the absorption regimes mm05 (2D), mm06 and critical mm07 with mm08 (3D); whether the argument extends to subcritical exponents mm09 without exponential moments remains open. The HJB solvability condition couples the Lipschitz norm of the Hamiltonian to the discount factor, so large-gain or small-discount regimes fall outside the contraction argument. The closability of mm10 in mm11 is left unresolved, restricting the regularity theory available for mild solutions. Finally, the treatment is confined to additive jump noise with spatially constant coefficient mm12; multiplicative Lévy perturbations would require derivative estimates for the noise channel that are not developed here.

Conclusion

The paper establishes the essential mm13-dissipativity of the Kolmogorov operator for the SCBF system driven by additive Lévy noise, apparently for the first time in the jump-noise setting for equations of Navier–Stokes type. Its methodological contribution is to replace exponential moment estimates — unavailable or prohibitively difficult for Lévy-driven fluid models — with coercivity supplied directly by the Forchheimer absorption term, thereby simplifying the proof that mm14 closes mm15. The resulting carré du champ identity, resolvent bounds, and perturbation theory support a complete mild-solution theory for the infinite-dimensional stationary HJB equation and an explicit optimal feedback law, providing a systematic template applicable to other dissipative SPDEs with strong absorption nonlinearities.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.