Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the gain of entrainment in stable linear control systems with a nonlinear output

Published 22 Jun 2026 in math.OC | (2606.23149v1)

Abstract: A control system admits a positive gain of entrainment (GOE) if entrainment to a periodic input yields a larger output, on average, than the output generated by the corresponding constant input with the same mean value. We analyze GOE in continuous-time stable linear control systems with a static nonlinear output map. Although linear systems with linear outputs have zero GOE, we show that a nonlinear output may generate a nontrivial GOE through the mismatch between the average output along the entrained periodic orbit and the output evaluated at the corresponding averaged equilibrium. We derive a second-order characterization of GOE for smooth output maps revealing that the leading-order contribution is determined by the curvature of the output map. We then show that if the output is convex (concave) on the controllable subspace, then GOE is nonnegative (nonpositive) for every periodic input. Furthermore, GOE admits a natural geometric interpretation as the average Bregman divergence between the entrained periodic orbit and the equilibrium associated with the averaged input. For the special case of quadratic output functions, we derive explicit frequency-domain formulas for GOE. These yield necessary and sufficient conditions guaranteeing the sign of GOE, characterize the contribution of individual input harmonics, and lead to an optimal periodic excitation that maximizes GOE under an energy constraint. The theoretical results are illustrated using an electrical RLC circuit and a compartmental pharmacodynamic model with a nonlinear drug-effect map.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper shows that gain of entrainment is a second-order effect determined by the output map’s curvature and the covariance of oscillatory state trajectories, while first-order effects cancel.
  • The paper proves that convex outputs guarantee nonnegative gain and concave outputs guarantee nonpositive gain on the controllable subspace, with applications to RLC circuits and pharmacodynamic dosing.
  • For quadratic outputs, the paper derives an exact frequency-domain decomposition, identifies necessary and sufficient sign conditions, and shows that optimal excitation concentrates energy at one frequency and input direction.

Setting and motivation

The paper studies the gain of entrainment (GOE) for a multiple-input, single-output linear control system with a static nonlinear output map—a Wiener system:

xË™=Ax+Bu,y=h(x),\dot{x} = Ax + Bu, \qquad y = h(x),

with AA Hurwitz, so the system entrains to any TT-periodic input. For a TT-periodic input vv, the GOE is the difference between the time-averaged output along the entrained periodic orbit γv\gamma^v and the output at the equilibrium evˉe^{\bar v} generated by the constant input vˉ\bar v. A positive GOE means periodic forcing with a given mean outperforms constant actuation at that mean. The authors note that for linear systems with linear outputs GOE is identically zero, and prior work on weakly contractive bilinear systems showed GOE is inherently a second-or-higher-order effect in excitation amplitude (2606.23149). The central question is therefore how nonlinearity confined to the output map can generate nonzero GOE.

Second-order characterization

A key structural fact is that for a stable linear system, the time average of the entrained orbit equals the equilibrium of the averaged input: γv‾=evˉ=−A−1Bvˉ\overline{\gamma^v} = e^{\bar v} = -A^{-1}B\bar v. This follows directly from averaging the dynamics over one period. Consequently, all first-order terms cancel: writing uε(t)=vˉ+εw(t)u_\varepsilon(t) = \bar v + \varepsilon w(t) with zero-mean AA0, a Taylor expansion shows

AA1

where AA2 is the covariance matrix of the periodic orbit about its mean. Thus the leading-order contribution is governed entirely by the curvature of AA3 along the oscillatory component of the state trajectory; the gradient of AA4 plays no role.

Convexity, Bregman divergence, and sign guarantees

Two consequences follow. First, if AA5 is convex (concave) when restricted to the controllable subspace AA6—the only region visited by periodic orbits and equilibria—then Jensen's inequality yields AA7 (AA8) for every periodic input, with strict inequality under strict convexity/concavity and nonconstant orbits. This is a robustness property: the sign guarantee holds regardless of the specific entries of AA9 and TT0, provided TT1 is Hurwitz. Notably, convexity is sufficient but not necessary: the paper exhibits a saddle-type quadratic output (TT2) on a fully controllable two-state system whose transfer function nevertheless produces strictly positive GOE for every periodic input.

Second, for TT3 the paper establishes an exact identity:

TT4

where TT5 is the Bregman divergence. GOE is thus a geometric quantity measuring the average gap between the output graph and its tangent plane at the averaged equilibrium. When TT6 is negative entropy on the simplex, this becomes the average Kullback–Leibler divergence between the forced orbit and the equilibrium, suggesting a possible link to entropy production in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics—though the paper does not develop this connection formally.

Quadratic outputs: frequency-domain analysis

For TT7, the second-order expansion becomes exact and GOE equals the weighted variance TT8 of the orbit. For multi-harmonic inputs TT9, orthogonality of harmonics gives an additive spectral decomposition:

TT0

where TT1. Each harmonic contributes independently, so GOE can be estimated from frequency-response data alone without a state-space realization. The paper derives a necessary and sufficient condition for universal nonnegativity: TT2 must be positive semidefinite for all TT3. Under an energy constraint TT4, the optimal excitation places all energy into a single sinusoid at the frequency–direction pair TT5 maximizing TT6 of this Hermitian matrix, achieving TT7; if this quantity is nonpositive, constant input is optimal.

Applications

RLC circuit: with stored energy as the (strictly convex, positive-definite quadratic) output, GOE is provably positive for every nonconstant periodic voltage. The closed-form expression for a sinusoidal input,

TT8

shows quadratic growth in amplitude, decay to zero at high frequency, and an optimal driving frequency strictly below the resonance frequency TT9.

Pharmacodynamics: for a transit-compartmental model with the saturating Evv0 dose–response map, which is concave on the positive orthant, the theory implies vv1 for all nonnegative inputs. Periodic drug administration therefore cannot beat constant dosing with the same average dose in this model class—a practically relevant negative result, confirmed numerically across driving frequencies vv2.

Limitations and open questions

The analysis assumes exact linearity of the dynamics; extension to weakly nonlinear systems vv3, where nonlinearities enter both dynamics and output, remains open. Interconnected Wiener systems, where inter-subsystem coupling may introduce additional GOE mechanisms, are not treated. Stochastic forcing and its relation to noise-induced fluctuations are unaddressed. More broadly, tractable conditions for GOE in general nonlinear control systems remain an open problem, and the necessity question for sign guarantees (beyond the sufficient convexity condition) is only partially resolved by counterexample.

Conclusion

The paper establishes that in stable Wiener systems, GOE arises from the mismatch between averaging and nonlinear evaluation, is a second-order effect determined by output curvature, admits an exact Bregman-divergence representation, and—for quadratic outputs—decomposes additively over input harmonics with sharp necessary-and-sufficient sign conditions and a closed-form optimal excitation. These results connect entrainment performance to classical frequency-domain tools and yield concrete design guidance for periodic excitation protocols.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.