Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Linear Recurrent Unit with Semantic Modulation for Image Super-Resolution

Published 18 Jun 2026 in cs.CV | (2606.19901v1)

Abstract: Linear recurrent unit (LRU), designed with a principled formulation for stable linear recurrence, has demonstrated promising accuracy and robustness on long-range dependency tasks. However, its static parameterization and single-scan method limits its applicability to 2D vision tasks. In this study, we propose a LRU-based restoration network with a semantic modulating unit (SMU) to achieve a harmonious balance between performance and efficiency in single-image super-resolution. The SMU plays three key roles: LRU modulation, spatial categorization, and feature enhancement through learned prototype. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method quantitatively and qualitatively surpasses recent state-of-the-art methods. Notably, our approach achieves superior performance with computational complexity on par with existing methods. The source code and models are available at https://github.com/MingyuChoi-run/LSM

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel LSM architecture that combines LRUs with a Semantic Modulating Unit for dynamic pixel-wise adaptation in image super-resolution.
  • It leverages techniques like complex diagonalization and cross-attention to enhance both local texture details and global contextual understanding.
  • LSM outperforms current Transformer and state-space models on key benchmarks such as PSNR and SSIM while reducing computational overhead.

Linear Recurrent Unit with Semantic Modulation for Image Super-Resolution


Introduction and Motivation

The paper "Linear Recurrent Unit with Semantic Modulation for Image Super-Resolution" (2606.19901) presents a novel architecture, LSM, leveraging Linear Recurrent Units (LRUs) augmented by a Semantic Modulating Unit (SMU) to balance resource efficiency and reconstruction quality in single-image super-resolution (SR). The motivation arises from the limitations of vanilla LRUs in adapting to spatial complexity inherent to SR, and the inefficiency and interpretability issues of dynamic state-space models (SSMs) and conventional Transformer-based backbones in vision.

LSMs integrate pixel-wise modulation informed by input-dependent semantics into the stable, linear recurrence of LRUs. This design addresses both long-range contextual modeling and local texture preservation while maintaining low computational footprint.


Core Contributions

The primary contributions of the paper are:

  1. Category-based Modulated LRU Architecture: Introduction of an SR backbone combining LRU and SMU, enabling dynamic modulation of LRU recurrence in response to pixel-level semantic categorization.
  2. Semantic Modulating Unit (SMU): SMU serves three complementary rolesโ€”parameter modulation of LRU via learned prototype tokens, semantic pixel categorization (via dictionary-driven clustering), and global feature enhancement through cross-attention with prototype embeddings.
  3. Resource-efficient Adaptivity: The LRU backbone's linear complexity allows allocation of greater computational capacity to the SMU, improving performance within fixed hardware constraints.

Methodology

Linear Recurrent Units for SR

LRUs are reformulated for stable linear recurrence using complex diagonalization, exponential eigenvalue parameterization, and normalization. The recurrence matrix initialization (eigenvalues sampled on the complex plane with controlled radius and phase) is shown to be critical for effective SR, as ablation studies reveal sensitivity to these initialization parameters, particularly due to SR's dual requirement for local texture and global contextual fidelity.

The base LRU update is static and non-adaptive, a limitation addressed by the paper through semantic modulation.

Semantic Modulation and Categorization

Inspired by RG-LRU gating for temporal sequences, the SMU injects spatial adaptivity by categorizing pixels with a learned dictionary (prototype tokens), modulating LRU state transitions, and enhancing features with cross-attention. Categorization uses Gumbel softmax with hard pixel assignments. Modulating tokens derived from dictionaryโ€“feature affinity are chunked and applied element-wise in the LRU update equations, enabling pixel-dependent state transitions.

The approach enables semantically distant but similar pixels to share information within a single scan, overcoming standard LRU limitations for 2D spatial data, while incurring minimal overhead.

Network Architecture

LSM follows a hierarchical design:

  • Local Block: Window-based multi-head self-attention for shallow feature extraction.
  • Global Block: Category-based Modulated LRU (CML) block orchestrating recurrence and semantic modulation.
  • Group Structure: Multiple local-global pairs are stacked, followed by pixel-shuffle upsampling for HR reconstruction.

Learnable skip connections bridge local and global representations.


Empirical Evaluation

Ablation Studies

Extensive ablation confirms the effectiveness of modulating tokens and categorization in SMU:

  • Eigenvalue Initialization: Larger radii and phase distributions yield improved PSNR, counter to prior LRU findings.
  • Functional Roles: Full SMU (categorization + modulation + cross-attention) yields consistent PSNR improvements and richer feature representations compared to vanilla LRU or partial SMU variants.
  • Modulation Paths: Each path (applied to A, B, C matrices) contributes independently to performance; softmax coupling between modulation and cross-attention is crucial for parameter efficiency.

Comparative Results

LSM variants outperform competitive Transformer and Mamba-based models (SwinIR, CAT-A, MambaIR(v2)-S) across standard SR benchmarks:

  • Classic SR: LSM and LSM+ not only achieve highest PSNR/SSIM in Urban100 and Manga109 but do so with fewer parameters and FLOPs.
  • Lightweight SR: LSM-light surpasses SwinIR-light, ELAN-light, OmniSR, and MambaIR-light, notably on high-resolution or texture-rich datasets.
  • Qualitative Analysis: LSM reconstructions exhibit superior artifact mitigation and texture fidelity, especially in challenging patterns (e.g., architectural lines, irregular curves).

Efficiency and Scalability

LSM achieves substantial reductions in GPU memory usage and computational complexity, enabling finer patch training and supporting larger input resolutions within fixed hardware budgets.


Discussion and Implications

The integration of SMU into LRU backbones introduces a paradigm shift for state-space modeling in vision, facilitating both global semantic consistency and local texture reconstruction via lightweight, interpretable mechanisms. This approach is competitive against both Transformer-based and advanced SSM-based methods under practical resource constraints.

Theoretical implications include bridging long-range recurrence and spatial adaptivity without quadratic complexity. The SMU methodology suggests broad applicability for other vision tasks where semantic grouping and sequence modulation are essential. Practically, LSMโ€™s memory efficiency can be leveraged for resource-constrained deployment, high-resolution inference, or adaptation to other vision restoration tasks.

Potential future directions include extending LRU-SMU combinatorics to multi-modal input, video SR, or hybrid architectures fusing attention/recurrence, and investigating the utility of semantic modulation in other recurrent frameworks (e.g., GRU, LSTM variants) for vision.


Conclusion

The paper demonstrates the first successful application of LRUs, modulated via semantic grouping, as an efficient yet expressive backbone for image super-resolution. By integrating a lightweight SMU for pixel-wise adaptation, LSM attains superior PSNR/SSIM and texture fidelity across multiple benchmarks at lower computational cost. This establishes LRUs, equipped with semantic modulation, as a viable alternative to dominant Transformer or state-space architectures in high-performance vision restoration pipelines.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.