Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos at muon-proton colliders via lepton-number-violating signals

Published 4 Jun 2026 in hep-ph | (2606.05962v1)

Abstract: We propose a novel search strategy for heavy Majorana neutrinos based on the lepton-number-violating process μ<sup>p</sup>jNj(<sup>+W<sup>)μ<sup>{-}p</sup> \to jN \to j(\ell<sup>{+}W<sup>{-}) at future muon-proton (μpμp) colliders equipped with 1 TeV muon beams and 7 TeV proton beams, yielding a center-of-mass energy of approximately 5.3 TeV. For heavy neutrinos with masses in the range 200 GeVmN1000 GeV200~\text{GeV} \lesssim m_N \lesssim 1000~\text{GeV}, this analysis targets the decay chain N<sup>+W<sup></sup></sup><sup>+jjN \to \ell<sup>{+}W<sup>{-}</sup></sup> \to \ell<sup>{+}jj, producing a characteristic final state consisting of one charged lepton and three well-resolved jets. For TeV-scale Majorana neutrinos, the WW boson is highly boosted, such that its hadronic decay products coalesce into a prominent fat-jet (JJ) signature. We conduct comprehensive signal and background analyses that account for realistic detector effects to assess the search sensitivity. We derive the projected $2σ$ exclusion limits on the neutrino mixing parameter VN<sup>2|V_{\ell N}|<sup>2 based on two typical integrated luminosity scenarios of 100 fb<sup>1100~\text{fb}<sup>{-1} and 1 ab<sup>11~\text{ab}<sup>{-1}. The results demonstrate that the proposed search strategy can achieve constraints substantially superior to the existing bounds from the LHC and other high-energy colliders. This study demonstrates that future μpμp colliders can provide competitive sensitivity for probing heavy Majorana neutrinos over the mass range 200 GeVmN3000 GeV200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 3000~\text{GeV}.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that resolved three-jet and boosted fat-jet searches can probe heavy Majorana neutrinos from 200 GeV to 3 TeV through lepton-number-violating production and decay.
  • The analysis projects 2σ limits on |VℓN|² of 1.3 × 10⁻⁶ to 7.4 × 10⁻⁶ below 1 TeV and 8.8 × 10⁻⁵ at 3 TeV with 1 ab⁻¹ of data.
  • The results indicate that a 5.3 TeV muon-proton collider could outperform several proposed facilities, although higher-order corrections, systematic uncertainties, detector design, and collider feasibility require further study.

Overview

This paper presents a phenomenological study of heavy Majorana neutrino searches at a future muon-proton (μp\mu p) collider with a 1 TeV muon beam and a 7 TeV proton beam, corresponding to s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.3 TeV. The analysis targets the lepton-number-violating (LNV) process μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-}), with =e,μ\ell = e, \mu, covering heavy-neutrino masses from 200 GeV to 3000 GeV. Two complementary final states are analyzed: a resolved topology with one charged lepton plus three jets for 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 1000 GeV, and a boosted fat-jet topology for mN1000m_N \geq 1000 GeV. The study employs full simulation chains including detector effects and derives projected 2σ2\sigma exclusion limits on the mixing parameter VN2|V_{\ell N}|^2.

Theoretical framework

The analysis is based on the minimal Type-I seesaw extension of the Standard Model, implemented through the SM_HeavyN_LOSM\_HeavyN\_LO UFO model. Three gauge-singlet right-handed neutrinos N1,2,3N_{1,2,3} are introduced, mixing with active leptons via the parameter s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.30 in their couplings to the s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.31, s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.32, and Higgs bosons. The benchmark scenario assumes a single light heavy neutrino s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.33 with flavor-symmetric mixing s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.34 and vanishing coupling to tau flavor; the remaining two heavy neutrinos are decoupled at 10 TeV. For s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.35, the branching ratios approach the asymptotic ratio s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.36, making the charged-current channel dominant.

The LNV signature arises because the Majorana nature of s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.37 permits both s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.38 and its charge-conjugate decay, shifting lepton number by two units (s5.3\sqrt{s} \approx 5.39). This provides a direct test of the Majorana hypothesis, complementing low-energy probes such as neutrinoless double beta decay.

Resolved three-jet analysis

For μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})0 GeV, the signal cross section decreases monotonically with mass due to phase-space suppression; at μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})1 GeV with μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})2, it is approximately 1.83 fb. Events are generated with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO using NNPDF23L01 PDFs, passed through Pythia 6 showering, Delphes 3.4.2 fast detector simulation (with a dedicated μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})3 detector card), anti-μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})4 jet clustering (μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})5), and analyzed within MadAnalysis 5.

Four sequential cuts are applied: single-lepton selection with mass-dependent μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})6 thresholds (50 GeV below 500 GeV, 1000 GeV above), jet multiplicity and μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})7 requirements, missing transverse energy μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})8 GeV, and an invariant-mass window μpjNj(+W)\mu^{-}p \to jN \to j(\ell^{+}W^{-})9 GeV. The cut flow demonstrates strong background suppression: after all cuts, the total background falls to the level of =e,μ\ell = e, \mu0–=e,μ\ell = e, \mu1 fb across all benchmark masses, while retaining 0.57, 0.36, and 0.114 fb of signal for =e,μ\ell = e, \mu2, 600, and 900 GeV respectively. With 1 ab=e,μ\ell = e, \mu3 of integrated luminosity, the resulting =e,μ\ell = e, \mu4 exclusion limits on =e,μ\ell = e, \mu5 range from =e,μ\ell = e, \mu6 to =e,μ\ell = e, \mu7 over 200 GeV to 1 TeV — substantially stronger than existing LHC bounds and competitive with or superior to projections for FCC-hh, FCC-eh, ILC, CLIC, and a 3 TeV muon collider in this mass range.

Fat-jet analysis

For TeV-scale neutrinos, the =e,μ\ell = e, \mu8 boson from the =e,μ\ell = e, \mu9 decay is highly boosted, and its hadronic decay products merge into a single large-radius jet. Fat jets are reconstructed with the Cambridge-Aachen algorithm at 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10000. A direct comparison with the FCC-eh (200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10001 TeV, 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10002 polarized 60 GeV electron beam) shows a marked advantage for the 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10003 option: at 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10004 GeV with 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10005, the cross section is 0.14 fb at the 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10006 collider versus 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10007 fb at the FCC-eh, a factor of roughly twenty improvement attributable to the higher partonic energy available in muon-initiated collisions.

Five cuts are applied, including a fat-jet mass window 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10008 GeV, 200 GeVmN1000200~\text{GeV} \leq m_N \leq 10009 GeV, and mN1000m_N \geq 10000. After the full selection, the total background is reduced to approximately 0.0043 fb for mN1000m_N \geq 10001 GeV, mN1000m_N \geq 10002 fb for 2000 GeV, and mN1000m_N \geq 10003 fb for 3000 GeV, with the dilepton process mN1000m_N \geq 10004 emerging as the dominant residual background. The projected sensitivities are:

mN1000m_N \geq 10005 [GeV] mN1000m_N \geq 10006 limit on mN1000m_N \geq 10007, mN1000m_N \geq 10008 fbmN1000m_N \geq 10009 2σ2\sigma0 fb2σ2\sigma1
1000 2σ2\sigma2 2σ2\sigma3
2000
3000 2σ2\sigma4 2σ2\sigma5

Notably, even with only 100 fb2σ2\sigma6, the 2σ2\sigma7 sensitivity exceeds the global indirect constraints on heavy-neutrino mixing across the entire 1–3 TeV range, and surpasses the projected reaches of CLIC (4 ab2σ2\sigma8), a 3 TeV muon collider (1 ab2σ2\sigma9), and FCC-eh (up to 3 abVN2|V_{\ell N}|^20) for masses below 3 TeV.

Limitations and open questions

Several assumptions qualify these results. The analysis assumes leading-order cross sections computed with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO; next-to-leading-order QCD corrections and their impact on both signal acceptance and background normalization are not assessed. The flavor structure is restricted to equal electron and muon mixing with VN2|V_{\ell N}|^21, so sensitivities under alternative flavor hypotheses remain unexplored. Detector performance relies on a Delphes fast-simulation card specific to a hypothetical VN2|V_{\ell N}|^22 detector rather than a fully designed experimental concept, and no systematic uncertainties on backgrounds or luminosity are included in the significance calculation, which uses the asymptotic formula of Cowan et al. The collider itself remains conceptual: beam parameters, achievable luminosity, and pile-up conditions for a multi-TeV VN2|V_{\ell N}|^23 facility have not been established experimentally. Finally, the study does not address lepton-number-conserving channels or displaced-vertex signatures, which could extend sensitivity to smaller mixings at low masses.

Conclusion

This work establishes that a future VN2|V_{\ell N}|^24 collider with VN2|V_{\ell N}|^25 TeV offers a competitive and complementary probe of heavy Majorana neutrinos between 200 GeV and 3 TeV. Exploiting on-shell single production via VN2|V_{\ell N}|^26-channel VN2|V_{\ell N}|^27 exchange and both resolved and fat-jet topologies, the proposed searches would constrain VN2|V_{\ell N}|^28 down to VN2|V_{\ell N}|^29 at low masses and SM_HeavyN_LOSM\_HeavyN\_LO0 at 3 TeV with 1 abSM_HeavyN_LOSM\_HeavyN\_LO1, improving on current LHC limits and outperforming projections for other proposed facilities in overlapping mass regions. The results position the SM_HeavyN_LOSM\_HeavyN\_LO2 collider as a credible option for testing the Majorana nature of heavy neutral leptons through clean SM_HeavyN_LOSM\_HeavyN\_LO3 signatures.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.