Three-color van der Waerden numbers grow super-exponentially
Abstract: For k sufficiently large, we show that there is a three-coloring of the first 2<sup>k</sup>(log<sup>∗</sup>k)/4 positive integers without any monochromatic k-term arithmetic progressions. Thus, the three-color van der Waerden number w(k;3) grows faster than any exponential in k. We further prove a new lower bound on multicolor van der Waerden numbers which resolves a problem of Erdős and Graham on canonical van der Waerden numbers.
Sign up to identify related papers:
Summary
- The paper proves that for all sufficiently large k, the three-color van der Waerden number satisfies w(k;3) > 2^{k(log* k)/4}, resolving the question of super-exponential growth for three colors.
- The authors combine dense arithmetic-progression-free sets, Lovász local lemma colorings, cyclic hitting sets, and random shifted products to iterate colorings while keeping the number of colors fixed.
- The results extend to many colors, yielding w(k;r) ≥ r^{(1−o(1))k log k} for sufficiently large r and resolving the Erdős–Graham problem with H(k) ≥ k^{(1−o(1))k log k}, while the two-color case remains open.
Overview and main results
This paper, by Jacob Fox and Zach Hunter (2606.02541), establishes that the three-color van der Waerden number w(k;3) grows faster than any exponential function of k. Specifically, for all sufficiently large k,
w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,
where log∗k denotes the iterated logarithm. This resolves a long-standing question in Ramsey theory: Erdős had offered $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth ofw(k;2), guessing it holds but expecting a difficult proof. The paper shows the answer is affirmative already at three colors (and hence for allr≥3), thereby refuting the conjecture appearing in several sources thatlimk→∞w(k;r)<sup>1/k</sup>=rfor every fixedr. The authors note that prior work of Hunter [2606.02541's cited reference] had already disproved this conjecture forr≥5k0(3<sup>r/3)<sup>(1−o(1))kk$1r = 3$.
A second main theorem gives a lower bound in the many-color regime: for each k2 there is k3 such that if k4 and k5, then
k6
As a corollary, the canonical van der Waerden number k7 — the least k8 such that every coloring of k9 contains a monochromatic or rainbow k0-term arithmetic progression — satisfies
k1
which resolves an open problem of Erdős and Graham asking whether k2. The authors point out that independent recent work of Bae obtained the weaker bound k3, which also settles the problem.
Dense sets without long arithmetic progressions
The construction begins from the classical Erdős–Turán digit-restriction set: for a prime k4, the integers whose base-k5 expansion avoids the digit k6 contain no k7-term arithmetic progression and occupy a fraction k8 of k9. Consequently, when w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,0, there are subsets of w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,1 of density w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,2 with no w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,3-term arithmetic progression. The authors transfer this to cyclic groups via a product argument over prime-power factors, obtaining a w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,4-AP-free subset of w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,5 of density at least w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,6 when w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,7 with primes w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,8. They also record the monotone parameter w(k;3)>2k(log∗k)/4,9, which satisfies log∗k0 for log∗k1.
A technical complication is that arithmetic progressions in log∗k2 may wrap around the cut between log∗k3 and log∗k4. The paper handles this with a Fourier-inspired but purely combinatorial lemma: for prime log∗k5, there is a subset log∗k6 of density at most log∗k7 meeting every wrapping log∗k8-AP in at least an log∗k9-fraction. The proof takes $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$0, where $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$1 is a balanced interval of length about $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$2 and $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$3; Dirichlet approximation ensures any progression either has large common difference (so is well-distributed over rotations by a counting lemma on balanced intervals) or has small structured difference (so intersects $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$4 directly).
The key structural input is Lemma "cyclicdense": for $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$5 a product of $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$6 distinct primes in $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$7 with $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$8, there is a subset $500 to prove or disprove super-exponential growth of$9 of density at most ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall0 containing at least a ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall1-fraction of every ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall2-AP, where one may take ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall3. The interval version is proved by a Lovász-local-lemma-style random construction: for each prime ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall4, choose ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall5 random residue classes mod ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall6; a union bound over progressions and deficient subsets shows positive probability that ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall7 has density at most ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall8 yet meets every ,guessingitholdsbutexpectingadifficultproof.Thepapershowstheanswerisaffirmativealreadyatthreecolors(andhenceforall9-AP in at least ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat0 fraction. The cyclic version follows by combining the interval construction with the wrapping-AP hitting set via the Chinese remainder theorem and a product lemma. Note the dependence of ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat1 on ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat2 is doubly exponential in ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat3; this loss governs how many iterations the final construction tolerates.
Local lemma colorings and random shifted products
Two further ingredients feed the iteration. First, a consequence of the symmetric Lovász local lemma shows that if ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat4 is an abelian group of order ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat5 with no prime factor below ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat6, then elements can be assigned ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat7-subsets of an ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat8-color set so that no color appears on more than ),therebyrefutingtheconjectureappearinginseveralsourcesthat9 vertices of any foreveryfixed0-AP. In particular, for foreveryfixed1, foreveryfixed2, any abelian group of order up to roughly foreveryfixed3 admits a two-coloring in which each foreveryfixed4-AP has at most foreveryfixed5 elements of either color.
Second, the paper develops two variants of the random shifted product construction. Given an foreveryfixed6-coloring of foreveryfixed7 that is far from monochromatic on every foreveryfixed8-AP and has a dense color class, and similarly for foreveryfixed9, one colors fibers of the projection .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor0 by independent random translates of the .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor1-coloring, with colors permuted according to the .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor2-color. A union bound over the at most .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor3 progressions yields an output coloring of .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor4 with the same qualitative properties, provided .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor5. A set-coloring-assisted variant instead consumes a coloring of .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor6 by .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor7-subsets of .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor8 and produces an ordinary .TheauthorsnotethatpriorworkofHunter[2606.02541′scitedreference]hadalreadydisprovedthisconjecturefor9-coloring of the product without monochromatic k00-APs when k01. Compared to the earlier product constructions in Hunter's work, these versions keep the number of colors fixed through the iteration, which is what makes the three-color result possible. The authors remark that replacing the union bound by the local lemma would improve the conditions by a factor involving k02, but only yield minor gains in applications.
Proof architecture of the main bound
The three-color lower bound proceeds by induction over k03 steps. Let k04 be distinct primes near k05 and k06. At step k07, the complement of the dense-hitting-set construction supplies a subset k08 of density at least k09 meeting every k10-AP in at most a k11 fraction, with k12 and k13; combining this with the local-lemma two-coloring gives a three-coloring of k14 with a very dense third color. The shifted product lemma then merges this with the coloring of k15: the group size grows by a factor exponential in k16 (each k17), while the density parameter degrades via a double-exponential recurrence k18. Since k19, the parameters remain valid for all k20 steps, producing a three-coloring of k21 with k22 and no monochromatic k23-AP. The exponent carries a factor of k24 arising from constants in the density bookkeeping; tightening these constants would improve the base of the growth but not its super-exponential character.
For the many-color regime, Theorem "masterpower" runs a similar recursion with k25 prime factors near k26, adding k27 colors per step via Lemma "addscolors general" and the set-coloring-assisted product lemma. Choosing k28 and optimizing yields Corollary "lastcor": for k29, k30 with k31, which implies Theorem "powervdw". The authors state plainly that improving the exponent beyond k32 is bottlenecked by the absence of a construction of a k33-AP-free set of density k34 inside k35 when k36; any such construction would immediately strengthen the bound through their master theorem. For very large k37 relative to k38, Rankin-type constructions give better bounds, and combined with the Kelley–Meka theorem one has k39.
Limitations and open questions
Several caveats qualify the results. The super-exponential bound applies only for k40; whether k41 itself grows super-exponentially — Erdős's original conjecture, which he suspected true — remains open, as does the asymptotic behavior of k42. The constant k43 in the exponent of Theorem "super-exponential" is an artifact of the analysis rather than intrinsic, and the authors' own remark indicates the union-bound conditions in the product lemmas could be sharpened via the local lemma, though with minor effect. The many-color bound requires k44, i.e., k45 polylogarithmic in k46 or larger; the intermediate regime and the exact dependence of k47 on k48 are left open, contingent on the density-construction bottleneck described above. Finally, the paper notes that parts of the framework are developed in greater generality than needed here, with applications to other arithmetic Ramsey numbers deferred to a forthcoming companion work, and the authors suggest the techniques should yield improved lower bounds for concrete small van der Waerden numbers with at least three colors.
Conclusion
This paper proves that k49 for all sufficiently large k50, establishing super-exponential growth of multicolor van der Waerden numbers and refuting the conjecture that k51. The proof combines Erdős–Turán-type dense AP-free sets, a robust sparse hitting-set construction valid in cyclic groups up to tower-height constraints, local-lemma colorings, and efficient random shifted product iterations that preserve the number of colors. The same machinery yields k52 once k53 and resolves the Erdős–Graham problem on canonical van der Waerden numbers via k54. The central open questions left by the paper concern the two-color case, the removal of the density bottleneck limiting the many-color exponent, and the optimal constants in the super-exponential rate.
Paper to Video (Beta)
No one has generated a video about this paper yet.
Whiteboard
No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.
Top Community Prompts
Open Problems
We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.
Continue Learning
- Why does the shifted product construction preserve three colors while producing larger groups without monochromatic arithmetic progressions?
- How does the iterated logarithm arise from the double-exponential parameter recurrence in the proof?
- What improvements to dense progression-free sets could strengthen the many-color lower bound beyond r^{(1−o(1))k log k}?
- Why does the paper’s method not currently establish super-exponential growth for the two-color van der Waerden number w(k;2)?
- Find recent papers about multicolor van der Waerden numbers and super-exponential Ramsey bounds.
Tweets
Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.