Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Asymmetric Two-Component Scalar FIMP Dark Matter

Published 25 May 2026 in hep-ph | (2605.25961v1)

Abstract: We propose a two-component asymmetric FIMP (feebly interacting massive particle) dark matter (DM) model in which both DM candidates are real scalar fields. The model is an extension of the Standard Model (SM) by two scalar DM components and a heavy scalar mediator, stabilized by a $\mathbb{Z}<em>2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2&#39;$ symmetry. DM is produced via the freeze-in mechanism through the Higgs portal, while the out-of-equilibrium decay of the heavy mediator generates an asymmetry in the first component, which is partially transferred to the second component via quartic interactions. By solving the Boltzmann equations numerically, we compute the relic density and perform a detailed scan over the parameter space. The observed relic density Ω</em>DMh<sup>2</sup>=0.12±0.001Ω</em>{\text{DM}} h<sup>2</sup> = 0.12 \pm 0.001 is successfully reproduced for benchmark parameters mφ<em>1=0.1m_{φ<em>1}=0.1~GeV, m</em>φ<em>2=0.5m</em>{φ<em>2}=0.5~GeV, λ</em>1H=7×10<sup>−11λ</em>{1H}=7\times10<sup>{-11}, and η=0.01η=0.01, with the second component contributing only about 5%5\% to the total abundance. We also examine phenomenological constraints. The DM self-interaction cross section lies orders of magnitude below the Bullet cluster bound ($σ/m &lt; 0.47$~cm<sup>2<sup>2/g) and the more stringent double radio relic limit ($σ/m &lt; 0.22$~cm<sup>2<sup>2/g). The invisible Higgs decay branching ratio is ∼4×10<sup>−19\sim 4\times10<sup>{-19}, well below the LHC upper limit, and direct detection prospects are negligible due to the small Higgs portal couplings. Our model establishes a novel connection between two-component DM, the freeze-in mechanism, and DM asymmetry.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an asymmetric two-component scalar FIMP dark matter model that employs freeze-in production to generate the relic density.
  • It uses a heavy scalar mediator and soft U(1) breaking to induce a primordial asymmetry, linking dark matter production with CP-violation.
  • Numerical Boltzmann analysis demonstrates quadratic sensitivity to portal couplings and linear dependence on asymmetry, consistent with Planck data.

Asymmetric Two-Component Scalar FIMP Dark Matter: Model, Dynamics, and Phenomenology

Model Construction and Theoretical Motivation

This work introduces a scalar FIMP (Feebly Interacting Massive Particle) dark matter (DM) framework incorporating two real singlet scalar fields, ϕ1\phi_1 and ϕ2\phi_2, along with a heavy real scalar mediator SS, all uncharged under the Standard Model (SM) gauge group and stabilized by a Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2' symmetry. The symmetry assignment ensures the absolute stability of both DM components, as each is odd under a distinct Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 factor, while all SM fields and SS remain even.

The model is further endowed with a soft breaking of a global U(1)U(1) dark number via a trilinear term μ12Sϕ12\mu_{12} S \phi_1^2, enabling the decay of SS to produce a primordial asymmetry in ϕ1\phi_1 through CP-violating decays, a characteristic aligning this setup with asymmetric DM scenarios. Quartic scalar couplings facilitate the partial transfer of this asymmetry to ϕ2\phi_20. Notably, all portal couplings linking the dark and visible sectors are chosen extremely small (ϕ2\phi_21), ensuring that both DM candidates are produced dominantly via the freeze-in mechanism, never attaining equilibrium with the cosmic plasma.

Freeze-In Production and Boltzmann Analysis

The freeze-in mechanism underpins the relic density generation for both ϕ2\phi_22 and ϕ2\phi_23. Production is dominated by decays of the SM Higgs boson ϕ2\phi_24, given the small DM masses (ϕ2\phi_25 GeV, ϕ2\phi_26 GeV) considered in the parameter scan. The portal couplings control the overall production rate, and the characteristic yield from freeze-in scales as ϕ2\phi_27.

Asymmetric production is implemented via a nonzero initial asymmetry parameter ϕ2\phi_28, injected at a high initial temperature, and preserved since symmetric processes are negligible due to feeble couplings. The Boltzmann equations tracking both particle and antiparticle yields for each DM component are numerically integrated from an initial temperature (ϕ2\phi_29 GeV) to the present day, incorporating all source and dilution effects.

Figure 1

Figure 1: Total DM abundance SS0 as a function of temperature SS1 for various Higgs portal couplings SS2. Freeze-in production is Higgs-dominated and controlled by SS3.

The parametric dependence, as visualized in Figure 1, confirms that the build-up of DM abundance freezes in as the temperature drops below SS4 GeV, corresponding to the decoupling regime of the parent (Higgs) abundance.

Figure 2

Figure 2: Total DM abundance SS5 for varying initial asymmetry SS6. Larger asymmetry results in higher freeze-in yields, manifesting as a linear scaling of final abundance with SS7.

The impact of SS8 is transparent: the asymmetric component augments the total DM abundance linearly, thereby providing a tunable mechanism to match the observed relic density for smaller portal couplings.

Relic Density Results and Parameter Dependencies

The numerical scan reveals that the total DM relic density, SS9, is a sum of individual contributions from Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'0 and Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'1, with the first component dominant under the chosen benchmarks. The observed cosmological density, Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'2 (Planck), can be precisely accommodated for Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'3 and Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'4, with Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'5 contributing only Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'6.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Relic density Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'7 as a function of portal coupling Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'8 for different values of the asymmetry Z2×Z2′\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2'9. The Planck value is indicated by a gray band.

These results Figure 3 illustrate the quadratic sensitivity of the relic density to portal couplings, and its linear scaling with asymmetry, allowing the model to evade under- and over-production issues across a broad parameter swath.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Relic density Z2\mathbb{Z}_20 as a function of the initial asymmetry parameter Z2\mathbb{Z}_21, for several portal couplings Z2\mathbb{Z}_22. Only a narrow stripe—constrained in both Z2\mathbb{Z}_23 and Z2\mathbb{Z}_24—reproduces the Planck relic density.

Phenomenological Constraints

Self-Interactions

Scalar self-couplings Z2\mathbb{Z}_25 and Z2\mathbb{Z}_26 lead to quartic contact interactions. The model's predicted DM self-interaction cross sections per unit mass are orders of magnitude below observational upper limits from merging clusters. Concretely, for benchmark points even at maximal (Z2\mathbb{Z}_27) perturbative values, Z2\mathbb{Z}_28 cmZ2\mathbb{Z}_29/g, easily satisfying the Bullet Cluster (SS0 cmSS1/g) and double radio relic (SS2 cmSS3/g) constraints.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Allowed parameter region in the SS4 plane under self-interaction constraints from the Bullet Cluster and double radio relic observations.

Invisible Higgs Decay and Direct Detection

The Higgs portal-mediated invisible decay widths for SS5 are exceedingly suppressed, yielding branching ratios SS6—vastly below experimental sensitivities of ATLAS and CMS. Likewise, DM-nucleon elastic scattering, being proportional to SS7, is also far below the detection thresholds of current and foreseeable direct detection experiments (LUX-ZEPLIN, XENONnT).

Implications and Outlook

The interplay of asymmetry and multiple FIMP components enables the polymorphic matching of the DM abundance, decoupled from the usual annihilation cross section constraints of thermal WIMPs. The asymmetric double-scalar FIMP scenario here not only conforms to all astrophysical and collider constraints, but also offers a dynamical route to linking DM and baryon asymmetries in the freeze-in paradigm—previously explored primarily in WIMP-ADM settings.

The model's flexibility in accommodating the observed relic abundance, while naturally suppressing dangerous signals in invisible Higgs decay and direct detection channels, represents an essential feature. Given the sub-GeV DM masses, attention to cosmological and astrophysical probes (e.g., structure formation, cosmic microwave background) is warranted in future studies. The framework also motivates further exploration of multi-scalar freeze-in models, transfer mechanisms of asymmetry, and possible connections to baryogenesis.

Conclusion

This two-component asymmetric FIMP model, stabilized by discrete symmetries and producing relic abundance through freeze-in, satisfies the cosmological dark matter density while evading all direct, indirect, and collider constraints. The model’s combination of a heavy asymmetric mediator, rich phenomenology, and decoupling from thermal equilibrium dynamics opens further lines of theoretical investigation, particularly in understanding the linkage between dark and visible sector relics and the signatures of non-thermal multi-scalar dark sectors.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 9 likes about this paper.