Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Non-adiabatic phonon renormalization in metallic versus insulating rutile oxides

Published 22 May 2026 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (2605.23227v1)

Abstract: We present a comparative Raman scattering study of metallic rutile oxides (RuO$_2$ and IrO$_2$) and insulating rutiles (TiO$_2$ and SnO$_2$). Temperature-dependent Raman spectra reveal that the metallic compounds exhibit pronounced phonon frequency hardening, $ω(11~\mathrm{K})-ω(300~\mathrm{K})=Δω\approx 6$-$10~\mathrm{cm}{-1}$, whereas the insulating rutiles show only modest hardening, $Δω\approx 1$-$3~\mathrm{cm}{-1}$. In contrast, the linewidth changes, $ΔΓ\approx 1$--$7~\mathrm{cm}{-1}$, do not display a systematic metallic-insulating classification. Fits with the conventional Klemens anharmonic decay model reproduce the overall temperature trends but yield inconsistent anharmonic parameters for the metallic compounds when benchmarked against insulating rutile analogues. A modified Klemens framework, incorporating an additional $T{2}$ correction to the phonon frequency arising from the electronic contribution to the phonon self-energy, quantitatively accounts for the enhanced renormalization observed in metallic systems. These results establish finite non-adiabatic electron-phonon coupling in metallic rutiles and demonstrate that phonon renormalization can be identified even in the absence of observable Fano asymmetry in the phonon line shapes.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.