Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

K-stability of adjoint foliated structures

Published 21 May 2026 in math.AG | (2605.21995v1)

Abstract: We introduce a notion of K-stability for adjoint foliated structures via test configurations and the foliated Donaldson-Futaki invariant. We prove reduction to special test configurations for adjoint Fano foliated structures by showing that the mixed Donaldson-Futaki invariant is non-increasing along the birational procedure. We also introduce a notion of Ding stability for adjoint Fano foliated structures which we show is equivalent to our notion of K-stability. We then introduce mixed alpha, beta and delta-invariants and use the reduction theorem to establish valuative criteria for the K-stability of adjoint Fano foliated structures. To conclude, as an application, we show that K-semistable adjoint Fano foliated structures with bounded volume form a bounded family.

Summary

  • The paper develops a mixed K-stability theory for adjoint Fano foliated structures using F-compatible, algebraically integrable test configurations and an adjoint foliated MMP.
  • It proves that stability can be tested using special degenerations, establishes equivalence with Ding stability, and gives a Fujita–Li valuative criterion through mixed beta and delta invariants.
  • It shows that t-K-semistable structures with fixed dimension and a positive volume lower bound form a bounded family, while examples exhibit wall-crossing and instability as t approaches 1.

Overview

The paper develops a theory of K-stability for adjoint foliated structures, i.e. triples (X,F,t)(X,F,t) consisting of a normal variety XX, an algebraically integrable foliation FF, and a parameter t[0,1]t\in[0,1], with the adjoint canonical class KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F. The central object is the adjoint Fano foliated structure, where KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F} is ample. The motivation is twofold: on one hand, K-stability of Fano varieties has matured into a complete moduli theory for klt Fano varieties; on the other, the MMP for algebraically integrable adjoint foliated structures — finite generation, existence and termination of flips, and boundedness analogues of BAB — has recently been established in [CHLMSSX24, CHLMSX25]. The paper answers affirmatively whether these two threads can be combined: it defines tt-K-stability via test configurations, proves reduction to special test configurations, establishes a Fujita–Li-type valuative criterion via prime divisors, introduces mixed α\alpha, β\beta, δ\delta-invariants, and derives boundedness of XX0-K-semistable structures.

F-compatible test configurations and the mixed Donaldson–Futaki invariant

The key definitional innovation is the notion of an XX1-compatible test configuration: a normal test configuration XX2 for XX3 equipped with a XX4-equivariant saturated integrable subsheaf XX5 restricting to the product foliation over the punctured base, with XX6 required to be algebraically integrable. The author is explicit that this last condition is imposed in order to invoke the MMP results of [CHLMSSX24, CHLMSX25], and that it is not claimed to be preserved under arbitrary deformations — removing it is left as an open question.

For such a test configuration, the mixed Donaldson–Futaki invariant is defined intersection-theoretically:

XX7

where XX8 is the foliated slope. The definition passes natural sanity checks: at XX9 or when FF0 (or FF1) it recovers the classical Donaldson–Futaki invariant. Positivity against all normal FF2-compatible test configurations defines FF3-K-semistability, with strict positivity for non-trivial configurations giving FF4-K-stability, and uniform stability formulated via the non-Archimedean J-functional. At FF5 one obtains a purely foliated notion, but the paper shows (Remark 6.x) that a naive K-stability theory for Fano foliations alone would be vacuous: any non-trivial FF6-invariant divisor FF7 satisfies FF8 while FF9, forcing t[0,1]t\in[0,1]0. This observation justifies focusing on the genuinely mixed regime t[0,1]t\in[0,1]1.

Reduction to special test configurations

The technical core adapts the Li–Xu road map [LX14] to families of adjoint Fano foliated structures over a curve. Starting from a normal t[0,1]t\in[0,1]2-compatible test configuration, after a finite base change and equivariant semistable resolution, the paper constructs a t[0,1]t\in[0,1]3-factorial qdlt model using the qdlt modification theorem for adjoint foliated structures, then runs a t[0,1]t\in[0,1]4-equivariant t[0,1]t\in[0,1]5-MMP with scaling, reaching a relative anti-adjoint model t[0,1]t\in[0,1]6. A final extraction step, ordering vertical coefficients so that exactly one distinguished component survives, produces a special fibre of discrepancy zero and hence a normal t[0,1]t\in[0,1]7-compatible special test configuration.

The monotonicity mechanism is that the mixed Donaldson–Futaki invariant is non-increasing along each birational step: along the qdlt/base-change step via differentiation of the invariant under perturbation of the polarisation (using the negativity of intersections of fibre-supported divisors), along divisorial contractions and flips because in the anti-adjoint regime t[0,1]t\in[0,1]8 and t[0,1]t\in[0,1]9 increases under the MMP steps, and along the final contraction by an interpolation argument. The main result is that for any normal KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F0-compatible test configuration there exists, after a base change of degree KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F1, a special KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F2-compatible test configuration with

KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F3

Consequently, KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F4-K-semistability can be tested only against special KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F5-compatible test configurations. Two assumptions are load-bearing here: the ambient variety must be potentially klt and KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F6 not pseudo-effective over the base, both needed to run the adjoint foliated MMP; the author notes that future work will show KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F7-K-semistable structures are klt, partially justifying these hypotheses.

Ding stability and the valuative criterion

A mixed Ding invariant is defined via the mixed log canonical threshold of the mixed correction divisor KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F8 along the central fibre. The same birational procedure shows the quantity KX,F[t]=(1t)KX+tKFK^{[t]}_{X,F}=(1-t)K_X+tK_F9 decreases along each step, and since the resulting special configuration is KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}0-weakly special (on which KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}1), the paper obtains the equivalence of KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}2-K-semistability with KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}3-Ding semistability, and of uniform KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}4-K-stability with uniform KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}5-Ding stability.

Combining this with a foliated adaptation of Fujita's flag-ideal blow-up construction yields the Fujita–Li valuative criterion: for KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}6 and KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}7,

KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}8

for every prime divisor KX,F[t]-K^{[t]}_{X,F}9 over tt0, where tt1. A key computational input is Proposition 4.x showing that for a Rees degeneration induced by an tt2-dreamy valuation, tt3; the proof carefully tracks how the foliated discrepancy transforms under blowing up tt4, contributing exactly tt5 (the transversality indicator) in the transverse case. It follows that tt6 of the associated special test configuration equals the mixed tt7-invariant of the central-fibre valuation.

Mixed tt8, tt9-invariants and boundedness

Following Blum–Jonsson [BJ20], the paper defines the mixed stability threshold via basis type divisors,

α\alpha0

and proves the limit of the finite-level invariants exists and admits this valuation-theoretic description. Consequently, α\alpha1 is α\alpha2-K-semistable if and only if α\alpha3, and uniformly α\alpha4-K-stable if and only if α\alpha5. The mixed α\alpha6-invariant α\alpha7 satisfies the standard sandwich

α\alpha8

so α\alpha9 suffices for β\beta0-K-semistability, while β\beta1-K-semistability implies β\beta2.

This lower bound feeds directly into boundedness. Using weighted blow-up computations showing that mixed discrepancies of extracted divisors satisfy β\beta3, the paper proves that any family with β\beta4 and β\beta5 consists of β\beta6-lc structures with β\beta7; combined with the boundedness theorem for adjoint Fano foliated structures from [CHLMSX25, Theorem B], this yields that β\beta8-dimensional β\beta9-K-semistable adjoint Fano foliated structures with volume bounded below form a bounded family. The author notes that a related boundedness statement appears in [CLSV26, Theorem E], proved there via minimal log discrepancy estimates without an accompanying K-stability notion; that result can also be deduced from the present theorem.

Examples and wall-crossing behaviour

Several general criteria illustrate the theory. If δ\delta0 is K-semistable δ\delta1-Fano, δ\delta2 is lc, and δ\delta3 with δ\delta4 for all divisorial valuations, then δ\delta5 is δ\delta6-K-semistable whenever δ\delta7; e.g., a general pencil of plane cubics gives a δ\delta8-K-semistable structure on δ\delta9 for all XX00. If XX01 is uniformly K-stable and XX02 is lc, then XX03 is uniformly XX04-K-stable for all sufficiently small XX05, by continuity of the delta invariant on the big cone.

On the unstable side, the paper proves a structural dichotomy: for any algebraically integrable Fano foliation XX06, there exists XX07 such that XX08 fails XX09-K-semistability for all XX10, since an XX11-invariant divisor has XX12 while XX13 stays positive near XX14. Similarly, non-lc singularities of XX15 obstruct semistability near XX16, so semistability along a sequence XX17 forces XX18 to be lc. In the proportional case XX19, the affine-linearity of XX20 in XX21 implies the semistable locus XX22 is a closed interval, possibly empty — a wall-crossing phenomenon. A concrete example: for a smooth cubic fourfold XX23 with the codimension-one foliation induced by a general Lefschetz pencil, XX24 is uniformly XX25-K-stable for small XX26 but not XX27-K-semistable for XX28, since the smooth pencil member XX29 has XX30. The radial foliation on XX31 gives instability for every XX32.

Limitations and open questions

Several restrictions are acknowledged explicitly. The algebraic integrability requirement on XX33 in the definition of XX34-compatible test configurations is a working hypothesis rather than a canonical feature, and its removability is open. The reduction and Ding arguments require the ambient variety to be potentially klt and the relative adjoint class to be non-pseudo-effective; the justification that XX35-K-semistable structures satisfy these conditions is deferred to future work. The openness of the XX36-K-semistable locus — the other essential ingredient for constructing a moduli stack XX37 with a good moduli space XX38 of XX39-K-polystable objects — "seems out of reach with the current MMP methods" according to the author. Finally, the toolkit for verifying XX40-K-stability in explicit examples remains limited, motivating the question of whether Abban–Zhuang theory extends to the mixed setting; the paper also leaves the properties of the mixed normalised volume XX41 unexplored, with a cone-characterisation of XX42-K-semistability planned for subsequent work.

Conclusion

The paper establishes that the standard architecture of K-stability for Fano varieties — test configurations, special reduction via MMP, Ding equivalence, Fujita–Li valuative criteria, delta-invariant characterisations, and boundedness — carries over coherently to adjoint Fano foliated structures, provided one works with XX43-compatible, algebraically integrable degenerations and exploits the recently developed adjoint foliated MMP. The boundedness theorem for XX44-K-semistable structures supplies the first pillar of a potential moduli theory, whose completion hinges on openness of the semistable locus and on XX45-completeness/XX46-reductivity checks formulated through test configurations.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.