- The paper derives explicit genus formulas for dormant modular curves of type (0,4) using balanced edge numberings, local finite-level D-module classifications, and Chern character computations.
- The formulas yield a uniform genus bound of at most (p−1)p^(2N−1)/4 and determine when level-reduced curves are nonempty through combinatorial radius data.
- The associated function field towers are shown to be asymptotically α-good under digit-separation conditions, with α = log(s)/(2 log(p)) and a proven asymptotic quality of at least 1/2 in key cases.
This paper by Aoyama, Morita, and Wakabayashi develops an explicit genus formula for a new class of curves over finite fields — the dormant modular curves of type (0,4) — and uses it to analyze the asymptotic behavior of towers of function fields obtained from these curves under level reduction. The construction is an analogue of classical modular and Drinfeld modular towers, with level structures replaced by higher-level dormant PGL2-opers on $4$-pointed stable genus-$0$ curves (2605.17973).
Background and construction
The paper works over a field k of odd characteristic p. Building on Berthelot–Montagnon's sheaves of differential operators of finite level, the authors consider dormant PGL2(N)-opers: PGL2-opers equipped with an (N−1)-PD stratification whose pN-curvature vanishes identically. For each quadruple of radii PGL20, the moduli stack PGL21 classifies pairs consisting of a PGL22-pointed stable curve of genus PGL23 and a dormant PGL24-oper of radii PGL25. By prior work of Wakabayashi (and Mochizuki in the level-PGL26 case), this stack is a geometrically connected, smooth, proper Deligne–Mumford PGL27-stack of dimension PGL28, hence a smooth projective curve when PGL29; this is the dormant modular curve. A compatible system of radii $4$0 yields a projective system of such curves via level reduction, whose transition morphisms are finite, faithfully flat, and generically étale.
The analogy with classical modular curves is structural rather than incidental: the forgetful projection $4$1 plays the role of the usual projection from modular curves, and the oper data replaces Igusa structures.
Combinatorial description of the boundary
A key input is that, over the boundary of $4$2, dormant opers correspond to balanced $4$3-edge numberings on trivalent graphs satisfying explicit triangle inequalities. The authors define sets $4$4 ($4$5) parametrizing these numberings, and prove a canonical bijection between the $4$6-points of the boundary divisor and $4$7. Two consequences follow directly:
- Nonemptiness criterion: $4$8 is nonempty if and only if $4$9, and when nonempty, $0$0 for each $0$1, with $0$2.
- Degree bound: $0$3.
The authors also show that raising the level within a fixed radius class does not change the curve: the level-reduction map $0$4 is an isomorphism whenever $0$5 lifts $0$6 compatibly. This fact is used crucially in deriving the simplified genus formula below.
Local $0$7-module analysis
The technical core concerns logarithmic $0$8-modules near nodes of a family of pointed stable curves. Around a formal node $0$9, the authors construct explicit k0-modules k1 indexed by k2, all having vanishing k3-curvature, and prove two structural results. First, any free k4-module with vanishing k5-curvature splits as a direct sum of the k6, and the multiset of exponents k7 is an isomorphism invariant. Second, they compute exactly the kernel and cokernel of the Frobenius-adjunction morphism k8: both vanish when k9, and both have p0-dimension p1 otherwise. These dimensions feed directly into the Chern character computations at the nodes.
Let p2 denote the canonical representative of a radius class in p3. The main theorem states that, for nonempty p4,
p5
Moreover, if all radii satisfy p6, the formula simplifies to
p7
The proof computes the Chern character of p8 for the adjoint dormant p9-oper associated to the universal family, using the Kodaira–Spencer isomorphism to identify this bundle with the log tangent bundle of the curve. Contributions arise from three sources: the marked points (psi-class terms computed via residue isomorphisms), the nodes (the node-local dimensions above), and the blow-up comparison against PGL2(N)0, where the cokernel of the Frobenius pushforward of PGL2(N)1 contributes terms supported on exceptional divisors. The simplified formula follows by comparing the general formula at levels PGL2(N)2 and PGL2(N)3, exploiting the isomorphism between consecutive levels.
Two corollaries quantify the result. The genus satisfies the uniform upper bound
PGL2(N)4
and the number of critical points of PGL2(N)5 admits an explicit upper bound derived from Riemann–Hurwitz. Worked examples illustrate the formulas: for PGL2(N)6, PGL2(N)7, and PGL2(N)8, one obtains PGL2(N)9 (a non-rational elliptic curve), while the simplified formula would incorrectly give PGL20 — confirming that its hypothesis is genuinely necessary. For equal radii PGL21 with PGL22, the genus evaluates to PGL23.
Asymptotic behavior of the function field towers
For a compatible system of radii PGL24, the function fields PGL25 form a tower (finite separable extensions, since PGL26 is generically étale), provided the genera tend to infinity. The authors introduce the notion of an asymptotically PGL27-good tower, requiring PGL28; asymptotic goodness in the classical sense corresponds to PGL29.
The main asymptotic theorem fixes an integer (N−1)0 with (N−1)1 and considers radii lying in (N−1)2, where (N−1)3 imposes a uniform separation condition on the base-(N−1)4 digits of the radii. For such (N−1)5, the tower satisfies
(N−1)6
hence is asymptotically (N−1)7-good. The proof combines the genus upper bound with the lower bound (N−1)8 coming from the digit-separation condition. Note that (N−1)9 always, so these towers are not shown to be asymptotically good in the classical sense.
When pN0, taking the symmetric choice pN1 yields pN2 and genus pN3, giving
pN4
More generally, any radii with pN5 for large pN6 produce pN7-good towers.
Relation to Heun equations
An appendix connects level-pN8 dormant pN9-opers on the PGL200-pointed projective line to Heun's differential operators. The authors prove that every dormant PGL201-oper on PGL202 arises from a Heun operator with a full set of root functions, and classify the redundancy: two parameter vectors determine the same oper precisely when the squares of the four exponent differences agree and one additional linear combination involving PGL203 agrees. This identifies the radii appearing in the genus formula with classical Heun exponent parameters.
Limitations and open questions
Several restrictions are stated plainly in the paper. The genus computation for the cokernel term is carried out only for PGL204; the analogous calculation for PGL205 involves more intricate intersection theory on stacks and is left incomplete. The asymptotic analysis depends on the digit-separation condition defining PGL206, and which patterns of radii yield asymptotically good (i.e., PGL207-good) towers has not been determined. The authors conjecture that PGL208 for every odd prime PGL209, but prove only the lower bound. Whether any dormant modular tower attains the Drinfeld–Vlăduţ bound, as classical modular towers do, remains open, as does the extension of the framework to higher-rank groups PGL210 and the study of zeta functions of these towers.
Conclusion
The paper supplies the first explicit genus formulas for moduli spaces of higher-level dormant opers on PGL211-pointed stable rational curves, together with quantitative bounds showing that the associated function field towers are asymptotically PGL212-good with PGL213 up to PGL214. The methods — local classification of finite-level PGL215-modules at nodes, Frobenius-pullback comparisons, and Chern character computations tied to the combinatorics of balanced edge numberings — provide a template for computing global invariants of dormant-oper moduli spaces, and connect the theory to the anticipated PGL216d TQFT structure and to enumerative questions beyond the cases treated here.