Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Genus formulas for dormant modular curves and asymptotic behavior of their function fields

Published 18 May 2026 in math.AG and math.NT | (2605.17973v1)

Abstract: Towers of algebraic function fields over finite fields play a fundamental role in arithmetic geometry and coding theory. Classical examples arising from modular and Drinfeld modular curves exhibit asymptotically good behavior. In this paper, we introduce an analogous construction derived from the moduli spaces of higher-level dormant PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_2-opers of prescribed radii on $4$-pointed stable curves of genus $0$. These spaces, which we refer to as dormant modular curves, form projective systems under level reduction. Building on previous results in the moduli theory of dormant opers, we establish an explicit formula for computing the genera of these curves. This formula allows us to study the asymptotic behavior of the corresponding towers of function fields and to compare them with the classical modular and Drinfeld modular cases.

Summary

  • The paper derives explicit genus formulas for dormant modular curves of type (0,4) using balanced edge numberings, local finite-level D-module classifications, and Chern character computations.
  • The formulas yield a uniform genus bound of at most (p−1)p^(2N−1)/4 and determine when level-reduced curves are nonempty through combinatorial radius data.
  • The associated function field towers are shown to be asymptotically α-good under digit-separation conditions, with α = log(s)/(2 log(p)) and a proven asymptotic quality of at least 1/2 in key cases.

This paper by Aoyama, Morita, and Wakabayashi develops an explicit genus formula for a new class of curves over finite fields — the dormant modular curves of type (0,4)(0,4) — and uses it to analyze the asymptotic behavior of towers of function fields obtained from these curves under level reduction. The construction is an analogue of classical modular and Drinfeld modular towers, with level structures replaced by higher-level dormant PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_2-opers on $4$-pointed stable genus-$0$ curves (2605.17973).

Background and construction

The paper works over a field kk of odd characteristic pp. Building on Berthelot–Montagnon's sheaves of differential operators of finite level, the authors consider dormant PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}-opers: PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_2-opers equipped with an (N1)(N-1)-PD stratification whose pNp^N-curvature vanishes identically. For each quadruple of radii PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_20, the moduli stack PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_21 classifies pairs consisting of a PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_22-pointed stable curve of genus PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_23 and a dormant PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_24-oper of radii PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_25. By prior work of Wakabayashi (and Mochizuki in the level-PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_26 case), this stack is a geometrically connected, smooth, proper Deligne–Mumford PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_27-stack of dimension PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_28, hence a smooth projective curve when PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_29; this is the dormant modular curve. A compatible system of radii $4$0 yields a projective system of such curves via level reduction, whose transition morphisms are finite, faithfully flat, and generically étale.

The analogy with classical modular curves is structural rather than incidental: the forgetful projection $4$1 plays the role of the usual projection from modular curves, and the oper data replaces Igusa structures.

Combinatorial description of the boundary

A key input is that, over the boundary of $4$2, dormant opers correspond to balanced $4$3-edge numberings on trivalent graphs satisfying explicit triangle inequalities. The authors define sets $4$4 ($4$5) parametrizing these numberings, and prove a canonical bijection between the $4$6-points of the boundary divisor and $4$7. Two consequences follow directly:

  • Nonemptiness criterion: $4$8 is nonempty if and only if $4$9, and when nonempty, $0$0 for each $0$1, with $0$2.
  • Degree bound: $0$3.

The authors also show that raising the level within a fixed radius class does not change the curve: the level-reduction map $0$4 is an isomorphism whenever $0$5 lifts $0$6 compatibly. This fact is used crucially in deriving the simplified genus formula below.

Local $0$7-module analysis

The technical core concerns logarithmic $0$8-modules near nodes of a family of pointed stable curves. Around a formal node $0$9, the authors construct explicit kk0-modules kk1 indexed by kk2, all having vanishing kk3-curvature, and prove two structural results. First, any free kk4-module with vanishing kk5-curvature splits as a direct sum of the kk6, and the multiset of exponents kk7 is an isomorphism invariant. Second, they compute exactly the kernel and cokernel of the Frobenius-adjunction morphism kk8: both vanish when kk9, and both have pp0-dimension pp1 otherwise. These dimensions feed directly into the Chern character computations at the nodes.

The genus formula

Let pp2 denote the canonical representative of a radius class in pp3. The main theorem states that, for nonempty pp4,

pp5

Moreover, if all radii satisfy pp6, the formula simplifies to

pp7

The proof computes the Chern character of pp8 for the adjoint dormant pp9-oper associated to the universal family, using the Kodaira–Spencer isomorphism to identify this bundle with the log tangent bundle of the curve. Contributions arise from three sources: the marked points (psi-class terms computed via residue isomorphisms), the nodes (the node-local dimensions above), and the blow-up comparison against PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}0, where the cokernel of the Frobenius pushforward of PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}1 contributes terms supported on exceptional divisors. The simplified formula follows by comparing the general formula at levels PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}2 and PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}3, exploiting the isomorphism between consecutive levels.

Two corollaries quantify the result. The genus satisfies the uniform upper bound

PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}4

and the number of critical points of PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}5 admits an explicit upper bound derived from Riemann–Hurwitz. Worked examples illustrate the formulas: for PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}6, PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}7, and PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}8, one obtains PGL2(N)\mathrm{PGL}_2^{(N)}9 (a non-rational elliptic curve), while the simplified formula would incorrectly give PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_20 — confirming that its hypothesis is genuinely necessary. For equal radii PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_21 with PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_22, the genus evaluates to PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_23.

Asymptotic behavior of the function field towers

For a compatible system of radii PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_24, the function fields PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_25 form a tower (finite separable extensions, since PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_26 is generically étale), provided the genera tend to infinity. The authors introduce the notion of an asymptotically PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_27-good tower, requiring PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_28; asymptotic goodness in the classical sense corresponds to PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_29.

The main asymptotic theorem fixes an integer (N1)(N-1)0 with (N1)(N-1)1 and considers radii lying in (N1)(N-1)2, where (N1)(N-1)3 imposes a uniform separation condition on the base-(N1)(N-1)4 digits of the radii. For such (N1)(N-1)5, the tower satisfies

(N1)(N-1)6

hence is asymptotically (N1)(N-1)7-good. The proof combines the genus upper bound with the lower bound (N1)(N-1)8 coming from the digit-separation condition. Note that (N1)(N-1)9 always, so these towers are not shown to be asymptotically good in the classical sense.

When pNp^N0, taking the symmetric choice pNp^N1 yields pNp^N2 and genus pNp^N3, giving

pNp^N4

More generally, any radii with pNp^N5 for large pNp^N6 produce pNp^N7-good towers.

Relation to Heun equations

An appendix connects level-pNp^N8 dormant pNp^N9-opers on the PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_200-pointed projective line to Heun's differential operators. The authors prove that every dormant PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_201-oper on PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_202 arises from a Heun operator with a full set of root functions, and classify the redundancy: two parameter vectors determine the same oper precisely when the squares of the four exponent differences agree and one additional linear combination involving PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_203 agrees. This identifies the radii appearing in the genus formula with classical Heun exponent parameters.

Limitations and open questions

Several restrictions are stated plainly in the paper. The genus computation for the cokernel term is carried out only for PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_204; the analogous calculation for PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_205 involves more intricate intersection theory on stacks and is left incomplete. The asymptotic analysis depends on the digit-separation condition defining PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_206, and which patterns of radii yield asymptotically good (i.e., PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_207-good) towers has not been determined. The authors conjecture that PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_208 for every odd prime PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_209, but prove only the lower bound. Whether any dormant modular tower attains the Drinfeld–Vlăduţ bound, as classical modular towers do, remains open, as does the extension of the framework to higher-rank groups PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_210 and the study of zeta functions of these towers.

Conclusion

The paper supplies the first explicit genus formulas for moduli spaces of higher-level dormant opers on PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_211-pointed stable rational curves, together with quantitative bounds showing that the associated function field towers are asymptotically PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_212-good with PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_213 up to PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_214. The methods — local classification of finite-level PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_215-modules at nodes, Frobenius-pullback comparisons, and Chern character computations tied to the combinatorics of balanced edge numberings — provide a template for computing global invariants of dormant-oper moduli spaces, and connect the theory to the anticipated PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_216d TQFT structure and to enumerative questions beyond the cases treated here.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.