Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

From Diaz's Enriques Product to an nn-Fold Cup-Product Bockstein Family of Integral Hodge Counterexamples

Published 4 May 2026 in math.AG and math.AT | (2605.02129v1)

Abstract: We reinterpret Diaz's construction of Chow-trivial smooth projective varieties violating the integral Hodge conjecture as the level-two case of an (n)-fold cup-product Bockstein mechanism. Diaz's dimension-four example is (V=S_1\times S_2), where (S_1,S_2) are Enriques surfaces, and its obstruction is the Bockstein of π1<sup><em>α1π2</em>β2</sup>H<sup>3(V,</sup>Z/2(2))π_1<sup><em>α_1\cupπ_2^</em>β_2\in</sup> H<sup>3(V,\mathbb</sup> Z/2(2)). Here (α_1) is the K3 double-cover class and (β_2) is an Enriques Brauer-detecting class. We extend the finite-coefficient source construction to (X_n=S_1\times\cdots\times S_n) by forming Θn=π1<sup><em>α1π2</em>β2πn<sup>βn</sup></sup>H<sup>2n1(Xn,</sup>Z/2(n))Θ_n=π_1<sup><em>α_1\cupπ_2^</em>β_2\cup\cdots\cupπ_n<sup>*β_n</sup></sup> \in H<sup>{2n-1}(X_n,\mathbb</sup> Z/2(n)),with Bockstein Δn=δ(Θn)H<sup>2n(Xn,</sup>Z(n))Δ_n=δ(Θ_n)\in H<sup>{2n}(X_n,\mathbb</sup> Z(n)). Using external products of perverse sheaves, categorical Bockstein compatibility, and a Leibniz rule for the MacPherson--Vilonen boundary, we prove unconditionally that (Δ_n) has nonzero image in a distinguished Enriques--Brauer component of the MV obstruction channel. Under the Brauer-separation hypothesis, which asserts that algebraic codimension-(n) cycle classes have zero image in this same component, the class (Δ_n) is a non-algebraic (2)-torsion integral Hodge class. We verify this separation for decomposable algebraic cycles and reduce the remaining non-decomposable case, via integral even Chow--Künneth projectors on the Enriques factors, to a single coefficient-level algebraic-control problem involving the (H1(S_1,\mathbb Z/2(1))) Enriques double-cover direction. We also record a motivic finite-coefficient lift of the tower via the finite-coefficient cone (\mathbf 1_X(n)/2:=\operatorname{Cone}(\mathbf 1_X(n)\xrightarrow{\times 2} \mathbf 1_X(n))), and explain which formal part of the MacPherson--Vilonen zig-zag construction lifts motivically under Betti realization.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.