Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Projections for handling uncertainties and enabling domain truncation in diffuse optical tomography

Published 29 Apr 2026 in math.NA | (2604.26548v1)

Abstract: This paper presents a projection-based technique to mitigate the impact of modeling errors related to domain truncation, changes in the optode coupling coefficients, and misspecified optical parameters of different tissue types in diffuse optical tomography. The approach considers the primary Jacobian matrix of the forward map in the image reconstruction scheme, linking the primary unknown, i.e., the per-voxel absorption coefficient changes in the region of interest, to the optode measurements, as well as the nuisance Jacobians that do the same for the auxiliary unknown parameters of secondary interest. To mitigate mismodeled coupling coefficients or domain truncation, the method projects the linearized forward model defined by the primary Jacobian onto the orthogonal complement of the range of a nuisance Jacobian, or onto the orthogonal complement of the span of a number of first left singular vectors for the nuisance Jacobian that has been weighted to account for prior information on the measurement setup. In the case of a misspecified baseline optical parameter for some tissue type, the nullspace of the utilized orthogonal projection is defined to be the span of first left singular vectors for a (weighted) difference of two Jacobian matrices evaluated at two different levels for the considered tissue-wise optical parameter. The reconstruction is formed by applying Bayesian inversion with Gaussian prior and noise models to the projected linearized equation. We evaluate the method on simulated brain activity data obtained via Monte Carlo simulations of the radiative transfer equation in a voxelized head anatomy for a neonate with combined gestational and chronological age of 41.7 weeks.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a projection-based methodology to marginalize nuisances such as optode coupling, RONI absorption, and baseline misspecification.
  • It leverages Monte Carlo simulations and singular vector analysis to construct efficient projections that reduce artifacts in DOT reconstructions.
  • Bayesian inversion with these projections achieves robust ROI reconstructions, significantly lowering L2 errors under nonideal conditions.

Projections for Handling Uncertainties and Enabling Domain Truncation in Diffuse Optical Tomography

Introduction

The paper "Projections for handling uncertainties and enabling domain truncation in diffuse optical tomography" (2604.26548) presents a projection-based methodology for mitigating the effects of modeling inaccuracies in diffuse optical tomography (DOT). The authors specifically address three sources of model uncertainty: changes in optode coupling coefficients, absorption variations outside the region of interest (ROI), and misspecification of tissue baseline optical parameters. The rationale is adapting the inversion algorithm to project the measurement model onto the orthogonal complement of subspaces associated with nuisance parameters, thereby marginalizing their influence on reconstructed absorption changes. This essay delineates the methodological constructs, numerical findings, and the broader implications in functional neuroimaging.

DOT Forward Model and Linearization

DOT estimates spatially resolved absorption coefficient changes correlated with hemodynamic activity by measuring the amplitude and phase shifts of modulated light after propagation through tissue. The authors employ Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to model photon transport in a voxelized neonatal head, accurately capturing complex domain geometries and tissue heterogeneities.

The primary linearized forward model considered is

y=Jxtotal+e=Jx+J~x~+e,y = J x_{\text{total}} + e = J x + \tilde{J} \tilde{x} + e,

where yy are measurement differences, xx is the ROI absorption change, and x~\tilde{x} represents changes in the region of non-interest (RONI). Jacobians JJ and J~\tilde{J} relate these changes to measurements, respectively. A similar Jacobian is defined for coupling coefficients, denoted JcJ_c. Linearization is justified for small-to-moderate perturbations, given the underlying nonlinearity of the forward problem. Figure 1

Figure 1: The optode configuration and segmentation of the neonatal DOT head model, with sources and detectors localized over the left hemisphere and tissue types highlighted.

Projection Construction for Nuisance Marginalization

The central innovation is the systematic marginalization of nuisance parameter influence via orthogonal projections:

  • Low-Dimensional Nuisance Parameters (Coupling Coefficients): The range of JcJ_c is marginally low-dimensional; the projection

P=I−Jc(Jc⊤Jc)−1Jc⊤P = I - J_c(J_c^\top J_c)^{-1} J_c^\top

is applied to both data and the forward operator, cleanly separating the effects of coupling coefficient perturbations.

  • High-Dimensional Nuisance Parameters (RONI Absorptions): For RONI, direct projection onto the full range of J~\tilde{J} would severely degrade the signal. Instead, the approach utilizes a truncated subspace determined by dominant left singular vectors of a weighted yy0, guided by prior covariance structure.
  • Misspecified Baseline Parameters: Here, the nullspace of the projection is the space spanned by principal left singular vectors of the (weighted) difference of Jacobians at two baseline parameterizations, handling uncertainty in tissue-class optical properties.
  • Compound Projections: For scenarios involving multiple concurrent uncertainties, the basis vectors corresponding to all relevant nuisance subspaces are concatenated, allowing joint marginalization.

The mathematical framework is fully general and simulated using meticulous MCX-based Jacobian construction over the segmented anatomy.

Bayesian Inversion Under Projections

A hierarchical Bayesian linear Gaussian model is utilized for inversion, with priors on voxel absorptions and additive Gaussian noise. After projection, the posterior mean becomes

yy1

which encapsulates the data projected to the nuisance-marginalizing subspace, thus reflecting uncertainty-aware reconstruction. The approach is statistically coherent and computationally efficient due to the preserved low dimensionality after projection.

Experimental Protocol

A neonatal head volume is simulated, with finely detailed segmentation into scalp/skull, two CSF compartments, GM, and WM. Optical parameters are taken from literature for near-infrared light. The optode geometry covers a cortex-proximal field, with 15 sources and 21 detectors yielding 210 measurement pairs. GPU-accelerated MC guarantees high-fidelity measurements and efficient replay-based Jacobian computation.

Numerical Results

Reference Reconstructions

Initial reconstructions under idealized (mismodel-free) conditions yield low yy2 errors (0.185/0.266 for the two targets), serving as a benchmark. Figure 2

Figure 2: Representative cross-sections of target 1 and its reference L2 error reconstruction.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Representative cross-sections of target 2 and its reference L2 error reconstruction.

Mismodeled Coupling Coefficients

Simulations with randomized coupling coefficients (amplitude and phase) demonstrate that naive reconstructions become dominated by artifacts (yy3 errors ≫ 1). Projections based on yy4 restore the reconstructions to near-baseline quality (yy5 errors 0.195/0.266), substantiating the approach's efficacy for low-dimensional nuisance marginalization. Figure 4

Figure 4: Comparison of reconstructions for target 1 without vs. with coupling projection; substantial artifact removal is observed.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Projection-based reconstruction for target 2, showing artifact suppression.

RONI Absorption Marginalization

Domain truncation, where ROI excludes substantial tissue volumes, introduces interface artifacts if not handled. Projections onto subspaces determined by dominant eigenvectors of yy6 effectively suppress these, with only marginal yy7 error increases in the ROI (e.g., from 0.136 to 0.183). Figure 6

Figure 6: Domain truncation (top-half removed) and artifact-elimination in target 1 using RONI projection.

Figure 7

Figure 7: Artifact removal in brain-only reconstructions for target 2 when projecting out scalp/skull contributions.

Misspecified Baseline Absorption

Reconstructions with significantly erroneous baseline yy8 for GM/WM change dramatically, introducing bias and loss of sensitivity. By projecting onto the singular vector subspaces of the difference Jacobian (between baseline and an alternative plausible value), a substantial fraction of the error is recovered (yy9 reduced from over 1.1 to ≈0.39). Figure 8

Figure 8: Multilevel reconstruction quality under correct, misspecified, and projected baseline absorption in both targets.

Simultaneous Uncertainties

Compound cases (nonideal coupling and RONI perturbations combined) affirm that joint projection removes even more severe artifacts, resulting in reconstructions whose xx0 error is largely unaffected compared to single-nuisance scenarios. Figure 9

Figure 9: Joint nuisance (coupling + RONI) marginalization in target 1, yielding clean ROI reconstructions.

Figure 10

Figure 10: Compounded projection for target 2: clear suppression of multiple classes of modeling errors.

Implications and Future Directions

This projection-based strategy provides a rigorous, computationally tractable solution to primary sources of model mismatch in DOT and potentially other modalities with linearizable forward models and separable nuisance parameters. Critically, the approach bypasses the sampling-intensive methods such as the approximation error (AE) framework and avoids the computational bottleneck of deep learning or extensive MC marginalization.

Theoretical implications: The method generalizes Jacobian-based marginalization to arbitrary nuisance parameter structures, is compatible with high-dimensional Bayesian inversion, and provides a statistical mechanism to formalize truncated domains without explicit modeling of all tissue regions. The projection methodology is extensible to other inverse problems, e.g., EIT, and potentially multi-modal imaging.

Practical implications: Significant computational savings and robustness are enabled for longitudinal and real-time DOT reconstructions, as ROIs can be adaptively chosen with minimal loss of information. This is crucial for clinical settings involving neonates or moving subjects and where fast feedback is needed.

Future directions: Extension to scattering and anisotropy uncertainty, systematic optimization of the number and type of projected singular vectors, and data-driven selection of projection subspaces could further improve robustness. The impact of nonlinearities in high-contrast regimes, and integration with adaptive experimental design, remain open avenues.

Conclusion

The paper establishes that targeted orthogonal projections of the linearized forward model can marginalize specific modeling uncertainties in DOT reconstructions, achieving demonstrable reduction in artifacts and insensitivity to incomplete or uncertain modeling assumptions. The methodology is readily applicable in high-dimensional Bayesian settings, and the presented numerical results indicate clear superiority over naive inversion in the presence of nuisance parameters. This projection-based paradigm may catalyze improved accuracy, computational tractability, and adaptivity in next-generation functional optical imaging and beyond.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.