Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Torsion induced one-loop corrections to inflaton decay and the Stochastic gravitational waves

Published 15 Apr 2026 in hep-ph and hep-th | (2604.13844v1)

Abstract: We investigate one-loop corrections from torsion-induced four-fermion interactions to inflaton three-body decay and their impact on the associated stochastic gravitational-wave signal. We find a pronounced asymmetry in the dependence on the renormalization scale uu. While the enhancement of the gravitational-wave spectrum remains modest, not exceeding roughly a factor of order unity for representative inflaton masses well below the Planck scale within the perturbative regime, the suppression can be much stronger, reaching up to two orders of magnitude, corresponding to reductions at the percent level. These results imply that loop corrections, particularly fermionic self-interactions, can significantly reduce the predicted gravitational-wave signal in models based on tree-level analyses. This suppression may shift the signal outside the sensitivity range of future observations and should therefore be taken into account in realistic phenomenological studies.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that torsion-induced one-loop corrections notably suppress the gravitational wave signal from inflaton decay through four-fermion interactions.
  • It systematically computes one-loop effects in both two-body and three-body decay channels, establishing perturbativity constraints in the (x, y) parameter space.
  • The analysis reveals that loop corrections can reduce the GW spectrum by up to two orders of magnitude, impacting predictions for early universe reheating.

Torsion-Induced One-Loop Corrections to Inflaton Decay and Stochastic Gravitational Waves

Introduction and Theoretical Framework

The paper "Torsion induced one-loop corrections to inflaton decay and the Stochastic gravitational waves" (2604.13844) investigates the quantum field theoretic implications of spacetime torsion, arising in the first-order formalism of gravity coupled to fermions (Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory), on inflaton decay processes and their associated stochastic gravitational wave (GW) signals. The main focus is on the loop-level effects generated by torsion-induced four-fermion interactions, a dimension-six operator suppressed by the Planck scale, and their phenomenological consequences in cosmological settings where the inflaton mass is substantially below—but not negligibly far from—the Planck scale.

The total action comprises kinetic and mass terms for the inflaton (φ\varphi) and fermions (ψ\psi), a Yukawa interaction, and the torsion-induced four-fermion sector. The torsion term takes the generic form 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi), with κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}. Figure 1

Figure 1: Feynman rule for the torsion-induced four-fermion interaction (upper) and the one-loop diagram for inflaton two-body decay mediated by combined Yukawa and torsion-induced four-fermion terms (lower).

Perturbativity and Parameter Space Constraints

Leading one-loop corrections to the inflaton two-body decay (φψˉψ\varphi \to \bar{\psi}\psi) and three-body bremsstrahlung decay (φψˉψhab\varphi \to \bar{\psi}\psi h_{ab}, with habh_{ab} being the graviton) are systematically computed. These corrections depend critically on the renormalization scale uu due to dimensional regularization and the MS\overline{\text{MS}} scheme, entering as logarithms and arctanh functions in the amplitude expressions.

A central diagnostic is the ratio Rφψˉψ(0)R^{(0)}_{\varphi\to\bar\psi\psi} (and analogously ψ\psi0 for the three-body channel), quantifying the fractional modification of decay rates by loop effects. To maintain perturbative reliability, constraints are imposed such that the loop-corrected squared amplitudes remain within ψ\psi1 times their tree-level values, delineating the allowed region in the ψ\psi2 parameter space, with ψ\psi3 and ψ\psi4. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Combined constraints on ψ\psi5 parameter space from two- and three-body decay ratios, ensuring perturbativity for representative inflaton masses.

One-Loop Corrections to Three-Body Decay and Graviton Emission

The analysis of the three-body decay process incorporates both tree-level and one-loop diagrams. The loop effects contribute only via external fermion legs due to the structure of the Feynman rules, with diagrams internal to the bremsstrahlung graviton emission vanishing identically. The resulting differential decay rate ψ\psi6 exhibits an infrared divergence (regulated by a cutoff) and is independent of ψ\psi7 in the loop-induced sector. Figure 3

Figure 3: Feynman diagrams for inflaton three-body decay, illustrating the structure and origin of the fermion loop corrections with graviton emission.

The ratio ψ\psi8, defined as ψ\psi9, parametrizes the influence of loop corrections on the GW spectrum. The deviation 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)0 is shown to be highly asymmetric: enhancements reach at most 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)1, while suppressions can extend to two orders of magnitude under relaxed perturbativity near the Planck mass domain. Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Loop-induced deviations in 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)2 as a function of 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)3, highlighting the strong asymmetry as parameters approach the edge of perturbative validity.

Magnitude and Regimes of Suppression

The most pronounced reduction in the GW signal arises for inflaton masses 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)4. For 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)5, loop-induced effects remain negligible, while for 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)6, suppressions are both numerically substantial and critically dependent on 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)7. This is further corroborated when perturbativity constraints are relaxed. Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Extreme suppression/enhancement of 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)8 with large inflaton mass and relaxed perturbativity, showing the dependence on the renormalization scale.

Impact on the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Spectrum

The GW spectrum 3!κ264(ψˉγ5γaψ)(ψˉγ5γaψ)\frac{3!\kappa^2}{64}(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma_a \psi)(\bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \gamma^a \psi)9 is directly determined by κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}0. The Boltzmann equations governing the densities of inflaton, GW, and radiation during reheating are solved, incorporating the loop-corrected decay widths. The frequency range and amplitude of the GW signal depend on κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}1, κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}2, and the aforementioned dimensionless ratios. Loop corrections can shift the predicted GW signal downward by up to two orders of magnitude, moving it outside the reach of present and future GW detectors. Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Gravitational wave spectra for different parameter choices, illustrating the maximal enhancement and suppression relative to tree-level results and overlaying observational sensitivity curves.

Physical Implications and Future Directions

The results highlight the significant suppressive power of torsion-induced fermion loop corrections on the stochastic gravitational wave signals from inflaton decay, with modest prospects for enhancements. This has practical implications for realistic model building, specifically in theoretical scenarios involving reheating and inflaton couplings to fermions, where tree-level analyses may overestimate observable GW signals.

Notably, the degeneracy between scalar and fermionic final states in tree-level GW production models may be broken at the loop level, suggesting loop corrections as a possible probe of underlying particle content. In addition, the parameter sensitivity implies that constraints on inflaton and fermion masses and Yukawa couplings from primordial GW measurements could be sharper than previously recognized. Figure 7

Figure 7: One-loop diagrams in the Yukawa sector neglected in present analysis, which could further modify decay rates and GW spectra if included.

There remain open questions requiring non-perturbative assessment, especially as κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}3 approaches κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}4, where coupling strengths render perturbative QFT unreliable. Extension to scalar channels, annihilation processes, and inclusion of higher-order Yukawa contributions (κMPl1\kappa \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}5) should be considered in future work.

Conclusion

The paper presents a rigorous effective field theory calculation of torsion-induced one-loop corrections to inflaton decay processes and their consequences for stochastic gravitational wave generation. Suppression of the GW signal due to fermionic self-interactions is pronounced and asymmetric, especially as the inflaton mass approaches the threshold where quantum gravity effects become important. Inclusion of such loop-level effects is critical for credible phenomenological predictions in cosmological model building and for extracting constraints from future GW observations. Further theoretical developments, including non-perturbative analyses and application to broader particle content, will refine the understanding of torsion and its observational signatures.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.