- The paper quantifies dust-trap leakage with 300+ DustPy simulations, finding that a fiducial trap transmits 75% of its outer solid mass inward within 5 Myr and never fully blocks pebbles.
- Blocking efficiency increases with low viscosity, weak turbulence, massive or distant planets, and streaming-instability planetesimal formation, which can reduce pebble flux by up to two orders of magnitude.
- Full grain-size modeling predicts more leakage than two-population models and suggests cold water vapor is a more reliable observational tracer than C/O ratios for diagnosing trap permeability.
Dust traps—local pressure maxima in protoplanetary discs, often attributed to gap-carving planets—are frequently invoked to explain both the chemical diversity of inner discs observed with JWST and the isotopic dichotomy between carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous meteorites. The implicit assumption is that such traps block a significant fraction of the inward pebble flux. This paper by Houge, Johansen, Banzatti and Grant tests that assumption systematically using DustPy (2604.11925), a one-dimensional dust evolution code with a full grain size distribution including coagulation and fragmentation, across more than 300 simulations spanning disc viscosity αvisc, local turbulence strength δturb, planet mass Mp, planet location ap, and fragmentation velocity vfrag.
Methods and diagnostic framework
The authors adopt a 0.05 M⊙ tapered disc around a solar-mass star, an MRN initial size distribution from 0.1 to 1 μm monomers, and a fiducial fragile-grain fragmentation velocity of 1 m s−1. Crucially, they decouple the global viscosity αvisc (which sets accretion and gap depth via the Kanagawa et al. prescription) from the local turbulence parameter δturb (which controls collision velocities, maximum grain size, and diffusion), reflecting growing evidence that MHD winds may drive accretion while local turbulence remains weak. Planetesimal formation via the streaming instability is triggered when the midplane dust-to-gas ratio exceeds unity, converting dust at a rate proportional to each size bin's settling timescale.
The central diagnostic is the trap blocking efficiency B(t), defined as unity minus the ratio of cumulative solid mass crossing the gap location in a gapped simulation to that in an identical smooth-disc control run. This normalization isolates the effect of the gap itself from global changes in drift speed caused by varying turbulence or viscosity. The complementary quantity δturb0 measures leakiness. Simulations are initialized with the inner disc emptied of dust so that any material inside the gap demonstrably leaked through; an appendix demonstrates this does not bias the blocking efficiency.
The mechanism of leakage
The fiducial model (a 100 δturb1 planet at 10 au, δturb2, δturb3) illustrates the physics. Pebbles grow to mm sizes (δturb4) and are blocked at the pressure maximum, where the critical Stokes number for trapping is δturb5 (~10 μm grains). Although small grains constitute only ~20% of the solid mass in fragmentation-limited equilibrium, continuous fragmentation of trapped pebbles replenishes them, allowing mass to bleed through. By 5 Myr, 75% of the total solid mass initially outside the gap has crossed into the inner disc, and the blocking efficiency has decayed to only δturb6. Notably, the slowed pebble flux is longer-lived: after 5 Myr the planet-hosting disc delivers more solid material to the inner disc than the smooth-disc counterpart. A further subtlety is that the Stokes number rises by roughly an order of magnitude inside the low-density gap, restricting which grain sizes can cross—but leaky grains fragment and re-coagulate dynamically throughout their transit rather than drifting at fixed size.
Parameter space results
The full grid reveals four regimes:
| Regime |
Blocking efficiency |
Conditions |
| Highly/fully permeable |
δturb7–0.2 |
High δturb8, strong δturb9, low Mp0, or small Mp1 |
| Super-leaky |
Mp2 |
Deep wide gaps (Jupiter-mass planets, Mp3 au) accelerate inward gas flow |
| Moderately leaky |
Mp4–0.9 |
Intermediate parameters; flux reduced by factors of a few |
| Highly blocking |
Mp5 |
Low Mp6, weak Mp7, Mp8, often aided by planetesimal formation |
Several results stand out quantitatively. The most blocking case found—a Jupiter-mass planet at 40 au with Mp9 and ap0—reaches ap1. Conversely, the most super-leaky case (ap2 at 5 au, strong turbulence) yields ap3, meaning solids reach the inner disc faster than in a smooth disc. Complete blocking (ap4) is never achieved anywhere in the grid. Inner traps (ap5 au) are systematically leakier than outer traps because lower gas density at large radii raises particle Stokes numbers, making grains easier to trap—an effect that dominates over the fact that planets carve deeper gaps closer to the star. However, the relative importance of inner versus outer traps is time-dependent: inner traps regulate water delivery most effectively before ~1 Myr, whereas outer traps dominate thereafter, a behavior not captured by models assuming position-independent blocking efficiency.
A key finding is that highly blocking traps are almost always also sites of efficient streaming-instability-driven planetesimal formation. Most traps never reach the critical midplane dust-to-gas ratio, either because they leak or because vertical diffusion keeps solids stirred; those that do form planetesimals convert 10–100 ap6 of dust. Control simulations with planetesimal formation disabled show that the same traps would otherwise be far leakier—the pebble flux drops by up to two orders of magnitude only when planetesimals form. This role was not identified in earlier work based on simpler dust models. The implication is direct: it is planetesimal formation, not the dust trap per se, that can dramatically alter inner disc composition. If streaming instability is suppressed near zero pressure gradient, or if planet-induced turbulence stirs the trap, even the strongest traps would fall back to the moderately leaky regime. The paper notes this conclusion depends on the assumed formation efficiency ap7 and neglects ablation of planetesimals back into dust, which would raise the leaking flux.
Comparison with two-population models
Comparing against chemcomp's implementation of the two-population algorithm (two-pop-py), used in prior studies linking traps to inner disc chemistry, reveals systematic discrepancies. For ap8 the two approaches agree, but at weaker turbulence two-pop-py underestimates leaking by up to three orders of magnitude. The cause is structural: two-pop-py moves the entire dust population at a common mass-weighted velocity dictated by the largest pebbles, so once pebbles halt, leakage proceeds only by diffusion, producing sharp discontinuities in the predicted pebble flux. Because previous composition models built on two-pop-py concluded that most outer traps deplete the inner disc of oxygen and drive C/O > 1, this discrepancy directly challenges those predictions.
Implications for JWST observations
Converting simulated pebble fluxes through the water iceline (1.1 au) into observable cold water vapour masses shows that fully permeable traps reproduce smooth-disc values (ap9–10 μvfrag0), while moderately leaky traps yield 0.1–1 μvfrag1, consistent with JWST measurements. Taking CI Tau as a detection floor, 67% of the simulated traps produce a detectable cold water signal (for vfrag2), rising to 82% for vfrag3 but falling to 25% for vfrag4—so conclusions here hinge on the poorly constrained observable column correction. The prevalence of detectable cold water matches JWST findings that discs hosting ALMA-resolved traps commonly show cold water excesses.
On the C/O question, comparing the oxygen flux carried by icy pebbles against the carbon flux in gas-phase CHvfrag5 (assuming ≤10% of carbon resides in highly volatile carriers) shows oxygen dominates by orders of magnitude in nearly all cases. Only 4 of 250 traps—those with vfrag6 and active planetesimal formation—allow C/O > 1 (only 1 if the ice fraction is raised to 0.5). The authors therefore argue that outer dust traps most likely sustain a long-lived oxygen-rich inner disc with C/O < 1, and that the observed C/O > 1 discs around very low-mass stars likely require additional carbon sources such as refractory carbon processing, CO-to-CHvfrag7 chemistry, or inner cavities. They propose cold water emission as a more reliable tracer of trap leakiness than the C/O ratio.
Limitations and open questions
The one-dimensional DustPy framework cannot model the detailed gas flow around the planet, where 3D simulations show small grains crossing on horseshoe orbits and potentially being accreted by planets beyond the pebble isolation mass; whether re-coagulation in the gap increases that accreted fraction remains open. Gap profiles are imposed from empirical fits rather than evolved self-consistently, though testing an alternative prescription changed little. Porosity evolution is absent, planetesimal ablation is neglected, and the streaming instability threshold and efficiency carry significant uncertainty. Whether perfectly blocking traps exist depends on unconstrained monomer properties; the authors suggest deep transition discs lacking dusty inner discs as candidate systems. Finally, combining full coagulation physics with multidimensional hydrodynamics—e.g., via TriPoD-style subgrid models—remains untested at scale.
Conclusion
This parameter study establishes that dust traps are substantially leakier than inferred from simplified dust models, with most outer traps delivering most of their solid reservoir—and hence water—to the inner disc over 5 Myr. Highly blocking traps exist but require low viscosity, weak turbulence, massive planets, and, decisively, efficient planetesimal formation; it is the latter, not the trap itself, that can push inner discs toward oxygen-poor, carbon-rich compositions. The results favor cold water vapour lines over C/O ratios as observational diagnostics of trap leakiness, and they call into question quantitative predictions of inner disc chemistry derived from two-population-type dust evolution schemes.