- The paper introduces an order-dependent time-scale function and non-local time transformation that make Caputo–Fabrizio fractional equations dimensionally consistent while recovering the classical derivative at α=1.
- The method converts a first-order linear fractional equation into an ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients and produces a closed-form solution for a fractional RC charging circuit.
- The RC model approaches the textbook charge law as α→1, but the non-unique choice of the time-scale function means dimensional consistency alone does not determine a physically unique model.
Overview
The paper addresses a persistent technical obstacle in fractional modeling: the dimensional inconsistency that arises when an ordinary time derivative d/dt is replaced by a fractional operator in a differential equation governing a physical system. While the standard remedy for singular-kernel operators (Riemann–Liouville, Caputo) is the introduction of a scaling parameter σ with units of time, the author observes that this route is not directly applicable to derivatives with non-singular kernels, such as the Caputo–Fabrizio operator, which is itself dimensionless. The central contribution is a systematic substitution scheme based on a change of the independent variable, τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α), where φ is a time-dimensional function depending on the fractional order α. The method is illustrated on a first-order linear fractional differential equation and applied to a charging RC circuit (2604.02432).
Background and motivation
Fractional derivatives with power-law kernels capture algebraic memory decay but are singular at the origin, complicating the treatment of initial conditions. The Caputo–Fabrizio derivative replaces the kernel (t−s)−α with an exponential exp[−α(t−s)/(1−α)] and the prefactor 1/Γ(1−α) with (2−α)M(α)/2(1−α), where M(α)=2/(2−α). The resulting operator is linear, annihilates constants, interpolates correctly between σ0 (yielding σ1) and σ2 (recovering σ3), and has the Laplace transform
σ4
which facilitates analytical solution of FDEs. Crucially for dimensional analysis, the exponential kernel renders the operator dimensionless, so the naive replacement σ5 cannot preserve units, unlike the singular-kernel case where the operator carries units of σ6 and a single parameter σ7 (with σ8) suffices to restore homogeneity (2604.02432).
The change-of-variables scheme
The proposed construction introduces an auxiliary function σ9 with dimensions of time, defines the non-local time τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)0, and replaces
τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)1
Dimensional consistency requires the classical limit to be recovered at τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)2, imposing the constraint
τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)3
Applying the scheme to the linear first-order equation τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)4 with constant coefficients yields a fractional equation in τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)5 with time-dependent coefficients τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)6 and τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)7. Differentiating the integral form of the Caputo–Fabrizio equation converts it into an ordinary first-order ODE in τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)8,
τ(t,α)=∫0tdt′/φ(t′,α)9
which is solved via the integrating factor φ0. The general solution is φ1 with φ2 (2604.02432).
Application to an RC circuit
For a series RC circuit driven by a DC source φ3, Kirchhoff's voltage law gives the fractional equation φ4, with φ5 and φ6. The author chooses
φ7
which satisfies the classical-limit constraint. The resulting fractional equation,
φ8
is solved by the general formula above with the initial condition φ9. In terms of ordinary time, the capacitor charge is
α0
and the corresponding capacitor voltage is α1. The solution passes the essential consistency check: taking α2 recovers the textbook result α3 (2604.02432). The plotted voltage curves show classical behavior as α4 and increasingly dissipative, non-local dynamics for α5, interpreted as internal friction associated with the fractional order.
Limitations and open questions
The author is explicit that the choice of α6 is not unique: different admissible functions lead to different fractional differential equations and hence different classes of solutions, so the method guarantees dimensional consistency but does not by itself select a physically canonical model. The physical interpretation of α7 and of the resulting non-local time α8 remains open, paralleling the interpretational difficulties of the parameter α9 in singular-kernel treatments. The analysis is restricted to first-order linear FDEs; extension to higher-order non-singular derivatives is stated as a direction but not developed. The claim that the fractional order (t−s)−α0 represents energy dissipation is asserted rather than derived from a thermodynamic argument, and no experimental data are used to validate the RC-circuit solution beyond its classical limit.
Conclusion
The paper provides a systematic, dimensionally consistent procedure for formulating fractional differential equations with non-singular (exponential) kernels, based on a change of the independent variable governed by an order-dependent time-scale function (t−s)−α1 subject to a classical-limit constraint. The method reproduces standard singular-kernel results at (t−s)−α2, yields a closed-form solution for the fractional RC circuit, and generalizes the auxiliary-parameter approach of Gómez-Aguilar and others to the non-singular case. The principal open issue is the non-uniqueness of (t−s)−α3 and the associated ambiguity in the physical meaning of the resulting fractional dynamics.