Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Flux-equilibrated based a posteriori error analysis for an interface problem with CutFEM

Published 2 Apr 2026 in math.NA | (2604.02137v1)

Abstract: This paper addresses the local recovery of conservative fluxes and the a posteriori error analysis for an elliptic interface problem with discontinuous coefficients. The transmission conditions on the interface are imposed by means of Nitsche's method and the discretization is carried out using conforming finite elements on unfitted meshes via the CutFEM method. A flux is subsequently defined in the global Raviart-Thomas space, ensuring that it satisfies the natural conservation property on the cut cells, and is then employed in the a posteriori error analysis. We prove here the sharp reliability of the error estimator and show a numerical experiment which illustrates the approach.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a posteriori error estimation using flux-equilibration in CutFEM to effectively handle discontinuous coefficients in elliptic interface problems.
  • It employs an auxiliary mixed formulation with local Lagrange multipliers to construct globally H(div)-conforming, equilibrated fluxes and ensure local conservation.
  • Numerical experiments validate optimal convergence rates with adaptive mesh refinement, demonstrating robustness even in high-contrast and complex interface geometries.

Flux-Equilibrated A Posteriori Error Analysis for Elliptic Interface Problems: A CutFEM Approach

Problem Formulation and Motivation

This paper addresses a posteriori error estimation for elliptic interface problems with discontinuous coefficients using unfitted finite element meshes. The interface problem is characterized by a domain Ω\Omega partitioned into subdomains Ω1\Omega^1 and Ω2\Omega^2 by an interface Γ\Gamma, across which diffusion coefficients can jump and solution/flux continuity must be enforced. The major challenges arise from the non-matching interface geometry and maintaining both accuracy and conservative fluxes in such unfitted discretizations.

The Cut Finite Element Method (CutFEM) is applied to allow mesh elements to arbitrarily intersect the interface, resolving geometric inflexibility at the expense of increased complexity in enforcing interface and conservation conditions. Transmission conditions are imposed variationally using Nitsche's method, complemented with stabilization terms for robustness. The work’s primary aim is flux recovery in H(div,Ω)H(\text{div},\Omega), providing equilibrated fluxes critical for sharp a posteriori error analysis and reliable adaptive mesh refinement.

Auxiliary Mixed Formulation and Flux Recovery

An auxiliary mixed formulation is developed to facilitate local flux recovery suitable for a posteriori analysis. The primal finite element solution is augmented with Lagrange multipliers defined per mesh edge, computed by solving explicit local linear systems associated with each mesh vertex. This robustly avoids the cost of global mixed problem solvers on complex geometries.

The recovered flux σh\sigma_h is constructed in the global Raviart-Thomas (RTk\mathrm{RT}_k) space, configured explicitly to ensure local conservation over each (potentially cut) element and strong enforcement of transmission conditions at the interface. Degrees of freedom for σh\sigma_h are set to match fluxes across element boundaries, with corrections provided by the Lagrange multipliers (see definition in Equation (3.1) of the paper). For higher-order RTk\mathrm{RT}_k spaces, additional interior constraints impose higher moment equilibrium. Figure 1

Figure 1: Notation on a cut element for the interpolation, delineating interface geometry and mesh subdivision essential for local error analysis.

The key property—equilibration—is rigorously maintained: for each T∈ThT \in \mathcal{T}_h, Ω1\Omega^10, where Ω1\Omega^11 is the Ω1\Omega^12 projection of Ω1\Omega^13 onto polynomials of degree Ω1\Omega^14 over Ω1\Omega^15. This guarantees the flux is globally Ω1\Omega^16-conforming while locally matching the residual equation.

A Posteriori Error Estimator Derivation

With an equilibrated flux available, the error estimator is formulated as the Ω1\Omega^17-norm of the elementwise difference between the recovered flux Ω1\Omega^18 and the discrete gradient Ω1\Omega^19, appropriately weighted by Ω2\Omega^20. This yields the indicator

Ω2\Omega^21

with additional interface contributions Ω2\Omega^22 accounting for the geometric complexity of cut elements and jump terms across the interface, scaled by localized cut parameters Ω2\Omega^23 and Ω2\Omega^24.

The main theoretical result is the proof of sharp reliability: the error estimator bounds the actual energy norm error up to higher order terms and data projections, with the leading constant exactly Ω2\Omega^25, independent of mesh size, interface placement, or diffusion coefficient contrast. The bounding inequality is:

Ω2\Omega^26

where Ω2\Omega^27 is a moderate constant unrelated to problem parameters and Ω2\Omega^28 captures data oscillation.

Specialized Interpolation for Cut Elements

A distinctive challenge in CutFEM is constructing conforming approximants in the presence of cut elements. The authors introduce an interpolation operator Ω2\Omega^29, defined on sub-triangulations of each cut cell that enforces continuity and aligns with the discrete interface averages at intersection points. This construction is crucial for realizing strong numerical upper bounds and achieving robustness with respect to mesh/interface interactions.

Adaptive Numerical Experiment

The paper presents numerical validation using a petal-shaped interface problem with a high-contrast coefficient jump (Γ\Gamma0). Mesh adaptation is performed using the Dörfler marking criterion, targeting 20% of the elements with highest local error—ensuring efficient refinement around the intricate interface.

The convergence plots reveal that both the error and estimator decrease at an optimal rate of Γ\Gamma1 with respect to the number of degrees of freedom Γ\Gamma2. This demonstrates that the equilibrated flux estimator, in conjunction with adaptive CutFEM, delivers reliable and efficient mesh refinement even for problems with complex interfaces. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Initial and final adaptive meshes with error slope convergence plot, highlighting refinement near the curved interface and optimal estimator decay.

Implications and Future Directions

This work substantiates the efficacy of flux-equilibrated a posteriori error estimation for interface problems under unfitted finite element discretizations. The major theoretical implication is the demonstration that sharp, robust, and locally computable estimators are attainable on meshes where the interface is not resolved, even with high parameter discontinuities. This is critical for industrial and scientific applications involving moving or highly complex interfaces where generating body-fitted meshes is infeasible.

Practically, the approach provides a foundation for robust adaptive algorithms in multi-physics simulations, phase-field models, and computational mechanics. The explicit, locally computable corrections made possible by edge-based multipliers and vertex-patch systems position this methodology as computationally tractable for large-scale problems.

Future developments may address extension to three dimensions, nonlinear or time-dependent interface problems, and further acceleration strategies for local solver steps. Enhanced parallelization and integration with scalable adaptive frameworks are also promising avenues.

Conclusion

The paper delivers a rigorous and constructive strategy for a posteriori error analysis of elliptic interface problems with CutFEM. By leveraging local flux equilibration in the Raviart-Thomas space, the method yields sharply reliable, efficient, and fully local error estimators. These are validated both theoretically and numerically, demonstrating optimal convergence even under severe interface geometry challenges and coefficient discontinuities, with immediate consequences for adaptive algorithms in computational science.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We're still in the process of identifying open problems mentioned in this paper. Please check back in a few minutes.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.