Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

CO-EVOLVE: Bidirectional Co-Evolution of Graph Structure and Semantics for Heterophilous Learning

Published 20 Mar 2026 in cs.IR | (2603.19596v1)

Abstract: The integration of LLMs and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) promises to unify semantic understanding with structural reasoning, yet existing methods typically rely on static, unidirectional pipelines. These approaches suffer from fundamental limitations: (1) Bidirectional Error Propagation, where semantic hallucinations in LLMs or structural noise in GNNs permanently poison the downstream modality without opportunity for recourse; (2) Semantic-Structural Dissonance, particularly in heterophilous settings where textual similarity contradicts topological reality; (3) a Blind Leading the Blind phenomenon, where indiscriminate alignment forces models to mirror each other's mistakes regardless of uncertainty. To address these challenges, we propose CO-EVOLVE, a dual-view co-evolution framework that treats graph topology and semantic embeddings as dynamic, mutually reinforcing latent variables. By employing a Gauss-Seidel alternating optimization strategy, our framework establishes a cyclic feedback loop: the GNN injects structural context as Soft Prompts to guide the LLM, while the LLM constructs favorable Dynamic Semantic Graphs to rewire the GNN. We introduce three key innovations to stabilize this evolution: (1) a Hard-Structure Conflict-Aware Contrastive Loss that warps the semantic manifold to respect high-order topological boundaries; (2) an Adaptive Node Gating Mechanism that dynamically fuses static and learnable structures to recover missing links; (3) an Uncertainty-Gated Consistency strategy that enables meta-cognitive alignment, ensuring models only learn from the confident view. Finally, an Entropy-Aware Adaptive Fusion integrates predictions during inference. Extensive experiments on public benchmarks demonstrate that CO-EVOLVE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving average improvements of 9.07% in Accuracy and 7.19% in F1-score.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.