- The paper establishes a sufficient frequent-hypercyclicity criterion for convolution-operator sequences on H(C), combining zero-freeness on an annulus, modulus comparisons, and reciprocal-decay summability.
- The method constructs right inverses with the Borel transform and applies the Bonilla–Grosse-Erdmann criterion, yielding frequent hypercyclicity for weighted powers such as (c_nΦ(D)^n) and non-power sequences.
- The results include (c_nD^n) under bounded positive successive-ratio growth and examples of infinite-order and genuinely non-autonomous operators, while identifying unresolved weaker growth conditions.
Context and motivation
The paper studies frequent hypercyclicity for sequences of convolution operators on the Fréchet space H(C) of entire functions with the compact-open topology. The operators considered are of the form Φ(D), where Φ is an entire function of exponential type and D denotes complex differentiation; by the Godefroy–Shapiro characterization, these are precisely the continuous linear operators on H(C) commuting with all translations. While hypercyclicity of such sequences was analyzed earlier (notably in Bernal-González's 1999 work), the frequent variant — introduced by Bayart–Grivaux — had been established only for iterates of a single operator: Bonilla and Grosse-Erdmann showed that every non-scalar Φ(D) is frequently hypercyclic. The present note extends this to genuine sequences (Φn(D)) whose members need not be iterates of one operator.
The main criterion
The central result is a sufficient condition for frequent hypercyclicity of (Φn(D)), where each Φn∈E (exponential type) and Φ0≡1. The hypothesis is geometric-comparative: there exist radii Φ(D)0 and coefficient arrays Φ(D)1 (Φ(D)2), Φ(D)3 (Φ(D)4) such that:
- Uniform summability: Φ(D)5 and Φ(D)6;
- Zero-free annulus: Φ(D)7 on the closed annulus Φ(D)8 for every Φ(D)9;
- Backward control: Φ0 on Φ1 for Φ2;
- Forward control: Φ3 on Φ4 for Φ5;
- Decay: Φ6.
Under these conditions, Φ7 is frequently hypercyclic on Φ8.
The proof applies the Bonilla–Grosse-Erdmann frequent hypercyclicity criterion on F-spaces, with Φ9, D0 the polynomials, and right inverses D1 constructed via the Borel transform. Specifically, since polynomials have exponential type zero, Pólya's representation gives D2 for any D3, and the zero-free condition allows
D4
which is well defined independently of D5 by Cauchy's theorem. Then D6 on D7 exactly, and the three unconditional-convergence conditions follow from contour estimates on the circles D8 combined with the summability assumptions. A notable feature is that condition (iv) holds with equality rather than merely asymptotically.
The authors concede that conditions (a)–(e) may appear ad hoc, tailored to fit the Bonilla–Grosse-Erdmann template; the second theorem addresses this concern by showing they are verifiable in concrete situations.
Applications to weighted powers
The main corollary concerns sequences D9 with nonzero scalars satisfying
H(C)0
If there exist circles H(C)1, H(C)2 on which H(C)3 and H(C)4 respectively, with H(C)5 zero-free on the intervening annulus, then H(C)6 is frequently hypercyclic. Taking H(C)7 yields that H(C)8 is frequently hypercyclic whenever the ratio condition holds — a family of finite-order examples. An infinite-order example is also given: H(C)9, where Φ(D)0 is unit translation; here Φ(D)1, and Rouché's theorem verifies the hypotheses on Φ(D)2 and Φ(D)3.
A further example exhibits a frequently hypercyclic sequence not of the form Φ(D)4 at all: Φ(D)5, with generating functions Φ(D)6 shown zero-free on Φ(D)7 via Rouché, and pairwise comparisons Φ(D)8 on the inner circle and the reverse inequality on the outer circle. This demonstrates that the criterion genuinely covers sequences beyond scalar multiples of operator powers.
Limitations and open questions
Three questions are posed explicitly. First, the ratio condition on Φ(D)9 implies but is strictly stronger than boundedness away from (Φn(D))0 and (Φn(D))1 of (Φn(D))2; whether the latter alone suffices for frequent hypercyclicity of (Φn(D))3 remains open, in contrast with the known hypercyclicity result under that weaker hypothesis (Bernal-González–Prado-Tendero). Second, hypercyclicity of (Φn(D))4 is characterized by unboundedness of (Φn(D))5, which is insufficient for frequent hypercyclicity since the large terms may occupy a set of full density complement; the paper asks whether (Φn(D))6 implies frequent hypercyclicity. Third, an analogous frequent-hypercyclicity theory for operators (Φn(D))7 with holomorphic coefficients (Φn(D))8, studied previously for ordinary hypercyclicity, is not developed here. The criterion itself is sufficient only; no necessity or converse is claimed.
Conclusion
The paper supplies a workable sufficient criterion — phrased as zero-freeness plus comparative modulus control on an annulus — for frequent hypercyclicity of arbitrary sequences of convolution operators on (Φn(D))9, together with concrete applications covering weighted powers of differential operators and a genuinely non-power sequence. It thereby extends the Bonilla–Grosse-Erdmann frequent hypercyclicity theorem from single operators to broad classes of non-autonomous sequences, while leaving the sharpness of the scalar-growth hypotheses as explicit open problems.