Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the triple product property for subgroups of finite nilpotent groups of class $2$

Published 17 Feb 2026 in math.GR | (2602.15796v1)

Abstract: A number of upper bounds are proved relating to the triple product property (TPP) for subgroups of finite nilpotent groups of class $2$. The TPP is the property defined for three non-empty subsets S,T,US, T, U of a group GG that the group equation $s&#39;s<sup>{-1}t&#39;t<sup>{-1}u&#39;u<sup>{-1}</sup></sup></sup> = 1$, over pairs of elements $s&#39;, s \in S$, $t&#39;, t \in T$, $u&#39;, u \in U$, is satisfied if and only if $s&#39; = s$, $t&#39; = t$, $u&#39; = u$. When GG is finite, and the parameter ρ0(G)ρ_0(G), called \emph{subgroup TPP ratio}, is defined as ρ0(G):=maxSTUGρ_0(G) := \max\frac{|S||T||U|}{|G|}, where the maximum is over the collection of all triples of subgroups S,T,US, T, U of GG satisfying the TPP, this paper proves that \textup{(1)} $ρ_0(G) &lt; \sqrt{|G:Z(G)}$} for (all) groups of nilpotency class $2$, \textup{(2)} ρ0(G)pρ_0(G) \leq p for pp-groups with a cyclic commutator subgroup of order pp, \textup{(3)} ρ0(G)=1ρ_0(G) = 1 for pp-groups of nilpotency class $2$ with a "large" centre, loosely defined as those satisfying p<sup>2</sup>G:Z(G)p<sup>3p<sup>2</sup> \leq |G:Z(G)| \leq p<sup>3, \textup{(4)} and ρ0(G)=1ρ_0(G) = 1 for pp-groups of nilpotency class $2$ with "small" (irreducible, complex) character degrees of $1$ or pp.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper proves that every finite group of nilpotency class 2 satisfies the strict bound ρ₀(G) < √|G:Z(G)|, using induction, quotient arguments, and structural analysis of subgroup intersections with the centre.
  • The paper establishes the sharp bound ρ₀(G) ≤ p for nonabelian p-groups with commutator subgroup of order p, with equality attained by an extraspecial group of order 32.
  • The paper proves ρ₀(G) = 1 for class-2 p-groups with p² ≤ |G:Z(G)| ≤ p³ and for groups whose irreducible character degrees are {1,p}, showing that broad structural conditions eliminate nontrivial subgroup TPP gains.

Background and motivation

The triple product property (TPP), introduced by Cohn and Umans as a group-theoretic framework for fast matrix multiplication (2602.15796), concerns triples of non-empty subsets S,T,US, T, U of a group GG such that the equation ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 1 holds only trivially. When S,T,US, T, U are subgroups, the condition simplifies to STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}. The subgroup TPP ratio of a finite group is

ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},

and ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 1 for every abelian group, since the triple product map is then injective. Values of ρ0(G)\rho_0(G) exceeding $1$ correspond to non-trivial "realisations" of matrix multiplication and enter the pseudoexponent α\alpha of Cohn–Umans, so upper bounds on GG0 translate into lower bounds on that parameter. The paper proves four upper bounds conjectured from computational data on small groups (computed with GAP, following Hedtke–Murthy's search algorithms): a universal bound for nilpotency class 2, a sharp bound for GG1-groups with cyclic commutator subgroup of order GG2, and two exact results GG3 for classes of GG4-groups of class 2.

The proofs rest on a common structural principle: in a non-trivial subgroup TPP triple, no member can be normal in GG5, and no member can contain the centre GG6 (otherwise the Neumann quotient lemma forces GG7 for an abelian quotient GG8). Consequently, in class-2 groups the analysis reduces to how the triple members intersect the centre.

The universal bound for class-2 groups

The main theorem states that if GG9 has nilpotency class 2, i.e. ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 10, then

ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 11

The proof is an induction on ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 12. Given a maximal non-trivial subgroup triple ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 13, one considers ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 14. If ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 15, the quotient lemma applied to ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 16 (which remains of class 2) and the index lemma relating ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 17 to ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 18 yield the bound. If ss1tt1uu1=1s's^{-1}t't^{-1}u'u^{-1} = 19, then S,T,US, T, U0 is abelian and non-normal, and S,T,US, T, U1 is an abelian normal subgroup of S,T,US, T, U2; the subgroup S,T,US, T, U3 is normal of class 2. If S,T,US, T, U4, the split proposition gives S,T,US, T, U5. If S,T,US, T, U6, then either some intersection S,T,US, T, U7 is non-trivial and the quotient argument applies, or else S,T,US, T, U8 is a semidirect product forcing S,T,US, T, U9 and

STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}0

The bound is consistent with the character-theoretic fact that irreducible character degrees satisfy STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}1, and it is strict — no class-2 group in the data attains equality.

Sharp bound STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}2 for STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}3-groups with STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}4

If STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}5 is a nonabelian STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}6-group with cyclic commutator subgroup of order STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}7 (a class including all extraspecial groups), the class-2 bound gives only STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}8 for STU=TU={1}S \cap TU = T \cap U = \{1\}9. The paper proves the much stronger, and sharp, bound ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},0.

The induction mirrors the class-2 argument, with an additional twist in the terminal case ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},1: comparing the semidirect product decompositions ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},2 and ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},3 forces ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},4. The commutator identity ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},5 then shows ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},6, so ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},7 is extraspecial, with ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},8 for ρ0(G):=β0(G)G,β0(G):=max{STU:(S,T,U) a subgroup TPP triple of G},\rho_0(G) := \frac{\beta_0(G)}{|G|}, \qquad \beta_0(G) := \max\{|S||T||U| : (S,T,U) \text{ a subgroup TPP triple of } G\},9. The Frattini argument then yields ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 10, which is impossible by the paper's lemma that two subgroups of order ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 11 in an extraspecial group of order ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 12 never generate ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 13 (proved via a central product decomposition into factors of order ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 14). Sharpness is witnessed by an extraspecial group of order 32 (GAP ID [32, 49]), the only group in the data with ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 15.

Two classes with ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 16

For ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 17-groups of class 2 with a "large" centre, defined by ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 18, the paper proves ρ0(G)=1\rho_0(G) = 19. The argument is short: such groups have ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)0 elementary abelian of order ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)1 or abelian of order ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)2, and in either case ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)3 contains an abelian maximal normal subgroup of index ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)4, which by earlier work forces ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)5. This is strictly stronger than the class-2 bound ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)6 that Theorem on cyclic commutators would give.

The second exact result concerns ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)7-groups of class 2 with character degree set ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)8. By the Isaacs–Passman structure theorem, such a group either has an abelian maximal normal subgroup of index ρ0(G)\rho_0(G)9 (giving $1$0) or has $1$1, in which case the large-centre theorem applies. Hence $1$2 in all cases. The paper notes the heuristic connection — small character degrees reflect the existence of large abelian subgroups, which in turn suppress $1$3 — but the implication runs through the classification rather than through any direct character-theoretic bound.

Limitations and open questions

The results concern only subgroup TPP triples; the more general ratio $1$4 over arbitrary subsets is not bounded here, and the conjecture $1$5 for groups with cyclic normal subgroups of prime index remains open from prior work. The class-2 bound $1$6 is not known to be tight, and the paper does not determine whether the gap between $1$7 and $1$8 can be closed for general class-2 $1$9-groups with larger commutator subgroups. All four theorems are proved for complex irreducible character degrees in the last case, and the computational evidence is limited to groups of small order (up to 128 for 2-groups, 27 for 3-groups), so the conjectures were extrapolated from sparse data. The connection to the pseudoexponent α\alpha0 and matrix multiplication exponents is noted but not developed quantitatively.

Conclusion

The paper establishes a strict universal bound α\alpha1 for all finite groups of nilpotency class 2, a sharp bound α\alpha2 for α\alpha3-groups with cyclic commutator subgroup of order α\alpha4 (including extraspecial groups, where the bound is attained), and exact values α\alpha5 for class-2 α\alpha6-groups with large centre or with character degrees in α\alpha7. Together these confirm four conjectures drawn from computational search and delineate substantial classes of groups for which subgroup TPP triples are provably trivial in size.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.