On the intersections of projected Hamiltonian orbits in cotangent bundles
Abstract: We study the generic behavior of Hamiltonian trajectories on a regular level set in the cotangent bundle, after projection to the base. We prove that for a generic submersive level set, projected trajectories have discrete (self-)intersections. Additionally, fixing end-point fibers, we prove that all intersections can be perturbed away if the base has dimension at least three. In particular, this applies to periodic orbits, and both results hold for Reeb flows on fiber-wise star-shaped hypersurfaces, including non-reversible Finsler flows, which answers a question of Rademacher. In the proof we make use of a multi-jet transversality theorem.
Sign up to identify related papers:
Summary
- The paper proves that, for residual Hamiltonians on regular submersive energy hypersurfaces, projected flow lines intersect only at discrete times, with stronger non-intersection results for dimensions at least three.
- The authors use multijet transversality and local Hamiltonian perturbations to eliminate finitely many intersections among chords and periodic orbits, overcoming the failure of tangency arguments for non-reversible systems.
- The results apply to star-shaped and Finsler hypersurfaces and, combined with filtered symplectic homology, convert homological growth into genuine counts of distinct Hamiltonian chords, including linear or exponential growth.
Overview
This paper by Dahinden and de Pooter studies the generic behavior of Hamiltonian trajectories on a regular energy hypersurface Σ=H−1(0)⊂T∗Q, after projection to the base manifold Q. Its main results establish that, for a residual set of Hamiltonians with submersive level set, projected flow lines intersect each other and themselves only in discrete sets of times; moreover, when dimQ≥3, all intersections between chords with fixed endpoint fibers (and between periodic orbits) can be perturbed away. This generalizes theorems of Rademacher on geodesics without self-intersections from Riemannian and reversible Finsler metrics to arbitrary Hamiltonians in the class Hams — those whose zero level set is regular and projects submersively to Q — thereby answering a question of Rademacher concerning non-reversible Finsler metrics.
The obstruction that Rademacher's argument faces in the non-reversible setting is that tangent projected geodesic segments need not coincide: without reversibility or an injectivity-radius mechanism, tangency does not force equality of curves. The present paper circumvents this by weakening the requirement from "no tangencies" to "discrete intersections," which suffices for the finite-resolution perturbation argument.
Main results
The paper proves two theorems. The first is the discreteness statement.
Theorem (discrete intersections). For dimQ≥3, there is a subset of Hams that is C7-residual in both the weak and strong Whitney topologies such that any two distinct Hamiltonian flow lines on Σ, up to time shift, have discrete intersection times after projection to Q. For Q0 the analogous statement holds for a Q1-residual set.
Discreteness is deliberately weak: it asserts no lower bound on the distance between consecutive intersection times, and the authors exhibit an explicit example of lines in Q2 realizing arbitrarily close intersections while remaining projections of Hamiltonian flow lines. Consequently, no uniform separation of intersections is claimed or achievable generically.
Theorem (main). For Q3 and fixed points Q4, there is a Q5-residual set of Hamiltonians in Q6 such that: distinct flow lines connecting the fibers Q7 and Q8 project to curves meeting only at the endpoints; such a line has injective projection except at coincident endpoints; geometrically distinct periodic orbits have disjoint projections; and no periodic orbit that is not a multiple cover self-intersects under projection.
A corollary specializes these results to two important open subsets of Q9: fiberwise star-shaped hypersurfaces (whose flows are reparametrized contact flows on the spherization dimQ≥30) and fiberwise analytically convex hypersurfaces (whose flows are precisely Finsler geodesic flows, with the Finsler norm recovered as dimQ≥31). Since residual sets intersect open sets residually, the theorems hold verbatim in these settings, including for non-reversible Finsler flows.
As an application, the authors combine their genericity result with filtered symplectic homology / positive Rabinowitz–Floer homology for exactly fillable compact hypersurfaces: for a dimQ≥32-residual set of such hypersurfaces, the number of geometrically distinct chords between two fibers grows in length at least as fast as the dimension of symplectic homology filtered by length; for fiberwise star-shaped hypersurfaces the growth is at least linear, and exponential growth of loop-space homology in degree yields exponentially many geometrically distinct chords. Because the homological lower bounds count generators that may fail to be geometrically distinct, the non-intersection theorem is what upgrades them to genuine counts of distinct curves.
Method
The proof structure mirrors Rademacher's three-step scheme: (1) non-degeneracy of the relevant periodic orbits and chords holds on a dimQ≥33-residual set, so only finitely many orbits of bounded length need be considered, and they vary continuously with the Hamiltonian; (2) discreteness of intersections makes the set of intersections finite; (3) local smooth perturbations resolve the finitely many intersections one at a time.
Step (3) is carried out by an explicit construction: near an isolated intersection, the base neighborhood is trivialized via the normal bundle of one curve, a parallel curve family is chosen avoiding the other curves (using a pigeonhole argument over uncountably many angular parameters), and the displacement is implemented by pulling back the Hamiltonian along a compactly supported family of diffeomorphisms of dimQ≥34, interpolated against the original dimQ≥35 by a cutoff. Non-intersection is then dimQ≥36-open among the finitely many non-degenerate orbits, so the property is dimQ≥37-open and dimQ≥38-dense locally, and a Baire argument over time horizons and a compact exhaustion yields global residuality.
The technical core is step (2), i.e., Theorem on discrete intersections, proved via jets of submanifolds. A Hamiltonian dimQ≥39 induces a section Hams0 assigning to each point its short flow line as a marked one-dimensional submanifold; this section depends only on the hypersurface Hams1, not on the defining function, since the characteristic line field Hams2 determines the conformal class of Hams3. Two projected flow lines with a Hams4-jet disagreement at an intersection point cannot accumulate intersections nearby (a Taylor estimate); hence discreteness follows if the composite multisection Hams5 hits the diagonal of Hams6 only over the diagonal of Hams7. The key transversality statement is:
- For a Hams8-residual set of Hamiltonians (Hams9, Q0), the antipodal set and the off-diagonal isopodal set (points whose projected flow-line Q1-jets agree, with matching or opposite orientation) are submanifolds of Q2 of dimension Q3.
The dimension count is decisive: for Q4 and Q5, or Q6 and Q7, the dimension is negative, so the off-diagonal homopodal set is empty — which is precisely the hypothesis needed for discreteness. The terminology extends the classical notion of antipodes in convex Finsler geometry (the unique point with oppositely oriented parallel momentum) to arbitrary orders of jet agreement, distinguishing isopodes from antipodes by orientation.
Transversality is achieved by exploiting the local structure of perturbations. The authors cover Q8 by radial charts, in which the level set is described as the graph of a positive function Q9 over dimQ≥30, and the characteristic flow becomes the Reeb flow of dimQ≥31 for a local contact form dimQ≥32 — equivalently, the autonomous contact Hamiltonian flow of dimQ≥33. They prove that the jet map dimQ≥34 sending the jet of a positive contact Hamiltonian to the dimQ≥35-jet of its flow line through the base point is surjective and submersive. The proof constructs, for any given jet of a path transverse to the contact distribution, an autonomous contact Hamiltonian realizing it, using the isotropic isotopy extension theorem together with a deliberate choice of one free component of the prescribed 1-jet (along the Reeb direction) that enforces autonomy via the Leibniz rule. Surjectivity plus submersivity means the preimage of the relevant multijet stratum dimQ≥36 is a fixed submanifold independent of the perturbation, and transversality of the graph of dimQ≥37 against dimQ≥38 follows from Mather's multijet transversality theorem in the modern formulation of Gootjes-Dreesbach.
Regularity considerations
An important remark establishes sharpness of the regularity assumptions. At dimQ≥39 level the theorem fails outright, since Hams0 perturbations can create closed orbits and chords at will. At Hams1 regularity it also fails: curvature bumps that are Hams2-small but Hams3-large can create conjugate points at a target fiber, causing a single chord to bifurcate into a controlled-by-nobody family of mutually intersecting chords, within any Hams4 neighborhood of a given metric. The Hams5 threshold in the main theorem is therefore essential, and the residual statements require correspondingly high differentiability (Hams6 with Hams7 up to 4 or 5).
Limitations and open questions
Several qualifications are stated plainly in the paper. The class Hams8 excludes vertical dynamics: submersivity of Hams9 guarantees C70, which is used throughout; Hamiltonians with fibers contained in C71 fall outside the framework. Compactness and properness are not assumed, so the flow need not be complete; the authors note that the main theorem is local in nature and can be extended via exhaustion by compact sets, but completeness itself is not recovered. The discreteness theorem gives no quantitative control — no lower bound on the spacing of intersections, and no continuity of the first intersection time. The example of the "heart"-shaped fiber shows that the first-order homopodal set can contain genuine non-manifold points at inflection points (where C72 is nontrivial); the transversality theorem handles inflection–non-inflection pairs by parametrization and claims generic manifoldness for inflection–inflection pairs off the diagonal, but the analysis of higher-order inflection phenomena is confined to what the dimension count requires.
Two specific questions remain open. First, the existence of simple closed geodesics on simply connected manifolds (in the sense of Adams–Hass–Scott) is untouched; the genericity machinery here does not address existence, only non-intersection once geodesics exist. Second, the residual statements are established in the C73 Baire space with specified finite regularity thresholds; whether the thresholds C74/C75 for discreteness, or the intermediate exponents in the transversality theorem, are optimal is not investigated.
Conclusion
The paper extends Rademacher's generic non-intersection theorems for geodesics to the full Hamiltonian category of submersive regular energy hypersurfaces in cotangent bundles, resolving his question about non-reversible Finsler metrics affirmatively. The method replaces Rademacher's implicit-function-theorem perturbation step with a multijet transversality argument on bundles of submanifold jets, powered by a surjective-submersive jet map from contact Hamiltonians to jets of their flow lines. Combined with filtered Floer-theoretic lower bounds, the results convert homological counts into counts of genuinely geometrically distinct chords, with linear or exponential growth rates dictated by loop-space topology.
Paper to Video (Beta)
No one has generated a video about this paper yet.
Whiteboard
No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.
Top Community Prompts
Open Problems
We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.
Continue Learning
- How does multijet transversality establish discreteness of intersections between projected Hamiltonian trajectories?
- Why is the C² regularity threshold essential for generic non-intersection results?
- How do these theorems extend Rademacher’s results for reversible and non-reversible Finsler metrics?
- How does filtered symplectic homology provide lower bounds for geometrically distinct Hamiltonian chords?
- Find recent papers about generic non-intersection properties of Hamiltonian and Finsler geodesic flows.