Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up Language Models with Abstract Data

Published 29 Jan 2026 in cs.CL and cs.LG | (2601.21725v1)

Abstract: Pretraining directly on web-scale corpora is the de facto paradigm for building LLMs. We study an alternative setting where the model is initially exposed to abstract structured data, as a means to ease the subsequent acquisition of rich semantic knowledge, much like humans learn simple logic and mathematics before higher reasoning. We specifically focus on procedural data, generated by formal languages and other simple algorithms, as such abstract data. We first diagnose the algorithmic skills that different forms of procedural data can improve, often significantly. For example, on context recall (Needle-in-a-haystack), the accuracy jumps from 10 to 98% when pretraining on Dyck sequences (balanced brackets). Second, we study how these gains are reflected in pretraining larger models (up to 1.3B). We find that front-loading as little as 0.1% procedural data significantly outperforms standard pretraining on natural language, code, and informal mathematics (C4, CodeParrot, and DeepMind-Math datasets). Notably, this procedural pretraining enables the models to reach the same loss value with only 55, 67, 86% of the original data. Third, we explore the mechanisms behind and find that procedural pretraining instils non-trivial structure in both attention and MLP layers. The former is particularly important for structured domains (e.g. code), and the latter for language. Finally, we lay a path for combining multiple forms of procedural data. Our results show that procedural pretraining is a simple, lightweight means to improving performance and accelerating LLM pretraining, ultimately suggesting the promise of disentangling knowledge acquisition from reasoning in LLMs.

Summary

  • The paper shows that pretraining with procedural data significantly enhances algorithmic skills like context recall and arithmetic operations.
  • It details a methodology where abstract procedural tasks reduce the need for extensive semantic tokens while boosting transfer learning capabilities.
  • The study reveals that combining diverse procedural data and analyzing layer-specific contributions yield measurable improvements in model performance.

Procedural Pretraining: Enhancing LLMs with Structured Data

Introduction

The paper "Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up LLMs with Abstract Data" (2601.21725) presents an investigation into the efficacy of using procedural data for pretraining LLMs. Unlike traditional methods that employ web-scale corpora, this study examines the benefits of initially exposing models to abstract structured data to enhance the acquisition of semantic knowledge. This novel approach is inspired by cognitive processes, suggesting that foundational algorithmic skills can support more complex semantic learning. Figure 1

Figure 1: Pretraining on procedural data before standard datasets enhances learning efficiency across domains, with varying layer contributions.

Methodology

The study utilizes procedural data generated from formal languages and simple algorithms, focusing on its ability to instill various algorithmic skills in LLMs. The experiments involve three main components: evaluating the impact of procedural data on algorithmic tasks, its transferability to semantic domains, and exploring the localization of pretrained information within models.

Algorithmic Skill Probing:

Procedural pretraining develops specific algorithmic capabilities such as context recall and arithmetic operations, which are crucial for tasks like Needle-in-a-haystack and arithmetic computations. Procedural tasks like k-Dyck sequences significantly improve accuracy, evidencing the structured data's role in enhancing these skills. Figure 2

Figure 2: Procedural pretraining significantly improves performance on algorithmic tasks compared to standard training.

Transfer to Semantic Domains

Procedural pretraining's benefits extend beyond isolated tasks, enhancing performance in semantic domains like natural language processing and code understanding. Models pretrained with procedural data achieve optimal outcomes using substantially fewer semantic tokens, showcasing improved data efficiency and faster convergence. Figure 3

Figure 3: Procedural data effectively transfers to domains such as natural language, reducing required standard data tokens.

Layer-Wise Localization:

Insights into model architectures reveal that different layers store distinct forms of learned information. Attention layers are more beneficial for structured data, whereas MLP layers augment natural language tasks, indicating procedural pretraining's diverse influence across model components. Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Transferable pretrained information is localized in specific layers, with distinct roles for MLP and attention based on the domain.

Combining Procedural Data Forms

The research also examines the utility of combining various procedural data types. Mixtures of procedural data facilitate greater performance improvements than individual forms, suggesting synergy between different procedural tasks. Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Mixtures of procedural data types outperform individual forms, demonstrating enhanced perplexity in language tasks.

Discussion and Implications

The findings underscore the potential of disentangling knowledge acquisition from reasoning in LLMs through procedural pretraining. This approach not only improves learning efficiency but also provides insights into refining model architectures and pretraining strategies. The research opens pathways for optimizing data selection in pretraining corpora, potentially leading to more sophisticated, well-grounded LLMs.

Conclusion

In summary, the paper presents procedural pretraining as a promising strategy to enhance LLM performance by focusing on elementary algorithmic skills. This approach offers a lightweight yet effective framework for improving LLM capabilities, highlighting an innovative direction for future AI development.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.