- The paper establishes sharp bounds for the second-order Toeplitz determinant $T_{2,3}(f)$ and extends these results to holomorphic mappings on Banach balls and the unit polydisk, offering practical bounds for various quasi-convex mappings.
- The solution involves using a standard subordination technique and leverages the Prokhorov–Szynal inverse-coefficient theorem and the Efraimidis–Livingston inequality, which provides a uniform bound across different convex function classes.
- Specializing the results for convex, convex order-α, and strongly convex classes offers clear bounds such as a constant 2 for the full convex class, aligning with previous classic one-variable estimates.
Overview and problem statement
This paper resolves an open coefficient problem for Toeplitz determinants associated with convex functions, first in one complex variable and then in several variables. For a normalized analytic function f(z)=z+∑n=2∞anzn on the unit disk U, the second-order Toeplitz determinant is T2,n(f)=an2−an+12. While sharp bounds for ∣T2,2(f)∣ and ∣T3,1(f)∣ were previously established for the Ma–Minda class of convex functions C(Ψ) by Ahuja et al., the estimate for ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣ remained open. The paper supplies this sharp bound and extends it to holomorphic mappings on the unit ball B of a complex Banach space and on the unit polydisk Un, with quasi-convex mappings of type B (in the sense of Roper–Suffridge) and their order-U0 variants (Liu–Liu) as special cases.
The one-variable result
The main theorem concerns U1, where U2 is analytic univalent with U3, U4, U5, starlike with respect to 1 and symmetric about the real axis. Under two additional hypotheses — namely U6 and U7, where the regions U8 are those appearing in the Prokhorov–Szynal inverse-coefficient theorem and
U9
the author proves the sharp estimate
T2,n(f)=an2−an+120
The proof follows the standard subordination technique: writing T2,n(f)=an2−an+121 with Schwarz function T2,n(f)=an2−an+122, coefficient comparison expresses T2,n(f)=an2−an+123 and T2,n(f)=an2−an+124 in terms of the coefficients T2,n(f)=an2−an+125 of T2,n(f)=an2−an+126. The hypotheses ensure that Efraimidis' generalization of Livingston's inequality bounds T2,n(f)=an2−an+127, while the Prokhorov–Szynal trichotomy bounds T2,n(f)=an2−an+128. Sharpness is attained by the extremal function defined through T2,n(f)=an2−an+129, for which both summands achieve equality simultaneously — a point worth noting, since the triangle-inequality step ∣T2,2(f)∣0 is generally strict; the specific phase relationship (∣T2,2(f)∣1 real, ∣T2,2(f)∣2 purely imaginary up to sign) at the extremal function makes it exact.
Specializing ∣T2,2(f)∣3 yields concrete corollaries:
| Class |
Bound on ∣T2,2(f)∣4 |
| Convex functions ∣T2,2(f)∣5 |
∣T2,2(f)∣6 |
| Convex of order ∣T2,2(f)∣7, ∣T2,2(f)∣8 |
∣T2,2(f)∣9 |
| Strongly convex of order ∣T3,1(f)∣0, ∣T3,1(f)∣1 |
∣T3,1(f)∣2 |
The strongly convex case carries the restriction ∣T3,1(f)∣3, inherited from the parameter constraints required for Lemma applicability. The constant ∣T3,1(f)∣4 for the full convex class is notably clean and matches the structure of earlier ∣T3,1(f)∣5 estimates for ∣T3,1(f)∣6.
Extension to Banach spaces and the polydisk
The higher-dimensional formulation replaces scalar coefficients with Fréchet derivative data. For ∣T3,1(f)∣7 with ∣T3,1(f)∣8 holomorphic, ∣T3,1(f)∣9, zero-free, and C(Ψ)0 (the Graham–Hamada–Koh class subordinate to C(Ψ)1), the Banach-space result states
C(Ψ)2
is bounded above by exactly the same expression as in the one-variable theorem, uniformly over C(Ψ)3 and C(Ψ)4. The proof reduces to the disk via the slice function C(Ψ)5 built from the quantity C(Ψ)6, using the identity C(Ψ)7 for C(Ψ)8. The third-order term is bounded via the Xu–Liu–Liu Fekete–Szegő inequality for C(Ψ)9 mappings, and the fourth-order term via the Prokhorov–Szynal lemma applied to ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣0. Sharpness holds for the mapping whose Fréchet derivative is ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣1, evaluated along radial slices ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣2.
On the polydisk ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣3, the analogous statement takes a slightly different form because the natural functional is vector-valued:
∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣4
The proof here is more involved: after reducing to coordinate slices indexed by ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣5 with ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣6, the componentwise estimates are first established on the distinguished boundary ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣7 and then propagated to all of ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣8 by the maximum modulus principle applied to the relevant homogeneous polynomial expressions. Sharpness is verified at points of the form ∣T2,3(f)∣=∣a32−a42∣9 for the explicit extremal B0.
Consequences for quasi-convex mappings
Choosing B1 recovers the Roper–Suffridge quasi-convex mappings of type B2, B3, giving the sharp uniform bound B4 in the Banach-ball setting and B5 on the polydisk. Choosing B6 gives Liu–Liu's quasi-convex mappings of type B7 and order B8, B9, with the corresponding weighted bound matching the one-variable corollary. These results complete the program initiated by Giri and Kumar, who had settled Un0 and Un1 for Un2 but left Un3 open; they also extend the classical Ali–Thomas–Vasudevarao estimate Un4 for planar convex functions to infinite-dimensional domains.
Limitations and open questions
The results depend on two structural assumptions that restrict their scope. First, the hypothesis Un5 selects the regime in which the Efraimidis bound for Un6 is governed by the nontrivial branch; the complementary regime is not treated, so the stated bound may not be sharp there. Second, the condition Un7 invokes only part of the Prokhorov–Szynal parameter space, and for the strongly convex subclass this excludes Un8. Whether the same bound, or a different sharp one, holds outside these parameter regions remains open. A further open question is whether the polydisk formulation can be unified with the Banach-space one under a single functional, since the two settings currently require different (though related) expressions.
Conclusion
The paper closes a known gap in the theory of Toeplitz determinants for convex-type functions by establishing the sharp bound on Un9 for the full Ma–Minda convex class under explicit parameter conditions, and by transporting the result to holomorphic mappings on Banach balls and polydisks through slice reduction and the maximum modulus principle. The resulting corollaries for quasi-convex mappings of type B0, with and without order, extend the classical one-variable estimates to several complex variables and to infinite-dimensional Banach spaces, with sharpness confirmed by explicit extremal mappings in each setting.