Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Refined rates of convergence for target-data dependent greedy generalized interpolation with Sobolev kernels

Published 28 Jan 2026 in math.NA | (2601.20407v1)

Abstract: Greedy methods have recently been successfully applied to generalized kernel interpolation, or the recovery of a function from data stemming from the evaluation of linear functionals, including the approximation of solutions of linear PDEs by symmetric collocation. When applied to kernels generating Sobolev spaces as their native Hilbert spaces, some of these greedy methods can provide the same error guarantee of generalized interpolation on quasi-uniform points. More importantly, certain target-data-adaptive methods even give a dimension- and smoothness-independent improvement in the speed of convergence over quasi-uniform points, thus offering advantages for high-dimensional problems. These convergence rates however contain a spurious logarithmic term that limits this beneficial effect. The goal of this note is to remove this factor, and this is possible by using estimates on metric entropy numbers.

Summary

  • This paper refines the convergence rates of PDE-$eta$-greedy algorithms in generalized kernel interpolation, eliminating a logarithmic term that was previously thought to be intrinsic to the method.
  • The improved error analysis uses metric entropy numbers instead of covering number arguments, revealing no inherent logarithmic penalty in the interpolation process.
  • This advancement applies to any $eta ext{ value } [0,1]$, providing adaptivity gains in approximation rates for PDEs in multiple dimensions.

Overview and contribution

This paper by Haasdonk, Santin, Wenzel, and Winkle sharpens the error analysis of PDE-β\beta-greedy algorithms for generalized kernel interpolation with Sobolev kernels (2601.20407). Generalized interpolation concerns recovering a function uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega) from data of the form Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x), where the LiL_i are linear bounded (differential) operators; symmetric collocation for PDEs is the canonical instance. Prior work [Wenzel2025] established that adaptive greedy selection rules yield a dimension- and smoothness-independent improvement in the convergence rate over interpolation on quasi-uniform points, but the resulting bounds carried a spurious logarithmic factor log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}. The main result removes this logarithmic term entirely, showing it was an artifact of the proof technique rather than intrinsic to the method.

The improvement is achieved purely through a refined analytical argument based on metric entropy numbers; no algorithmic changes are introduced, and numerical validation is deferred to the experiments already published in [Wenzel2025].

Setting: generalized interpolation with Sobolev kernels

The framework considers a strictly positive definite kernel kk on ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d whose native space embeds into W2τ(Ω)W_2^\tau(\Omega), with Matérn and Wendland kernels as standard examples. Data are generated by operators Li:W2τ(Ω)W2τmi(Ωi)L_i: W_2^\tau(\Omega) \to W_2^{\tau - m_i}(\Omega_i) satisfying a boundedness (trace-type) inequality, where each Ωi\Omega_i is either a subset of uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)0 or a smooth compact manifold of dimension uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)1. The condition uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)2 ensures that uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)3 is continuous on uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)4, so the composed functionals uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)5 are continuous on the native space and possess Riesz representers uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)6.

The generalized interpolant uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)7 is the minimal-norm element of the native space satisfying the constraints at selected functionals, equivalently the orthogonal projection of uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)8 onto the span of the selected representers. Error transfer from residuals to uW2τ(Ω)u \in W_2^\tau(\Omega)9 relies on a stability assumption of maximum-principle type,

Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)0

which holds for elliptic problems and more general collocation settings. The framework also accommodates parametric PDEs via slice-wise well-posedness over a parameter domain.

The selection rule analyzed is the PDE-Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)1-greedy criterion, which maximizes

Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)2

interpolating between pure Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)3-greedy (Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)4, target-independent) and Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)5-greedy (Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)6, fully target-adaptive). A useful structural lemma shows that any such greedy iteration selects linearly independent functionals automatically: if Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)7 then Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)8, and if all Liu(x)=fi(x)L_i u(x) = f_i(x)9 vanish the selected functionals span all of LiL_i0. This guarantees an invertible collocation system without additional point-separation assumptions.

Entropy number estimates

The technical core is a bound on dyadic entropy numbers of the absolute convex hull of the set LiL_i1, where LiL_i2. The argument proceeds in two steps.

First, a general lemma combines entropy estimates across the LiL_i3 operator families: if LiL_i4 for each LiL_i5, then additivity and monotonicity of entropy numbers give

LiL_i6

with the budget LiL_i7 allocated to each summand. The authors note this allocation is optimized only asymptotically; uneven distributions could improve the constant, and different regimes may hold for moderate LiL_i8 depending on the LiL_i9 and log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}0.

Second, each individual log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}1 is handled via the Siegel–van Kempen-type theorem on smoothly parametrized sets: since the map log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}2 is Lipschitz of smoothness log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}3 as a log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}4-valued function — established through the Hölder–Sobolev embedding on manifolds and the operator boundedness — one obtains

log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}5

Combining both steps yields log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}6, where log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}7 attains the minimum exponent among the operator families. Generic bounded domains are covered by embedding them into a ball and extending the kernel, which is possible for commonly used kernels.

Main convergence result

The bridge from entropy numbers to greedy rates follows the Li–Santin–Wenzel simplex-volume technique: the geometric mean of incremental power function values satisfies

log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}8

Substituting the entropy bound and following the structure of Theorem 5.1 in [Wenzel2025] yields the main theorem: for any log(n)2(τmˉ)dˉ2dˉmax(1,β)\log(n)^{\frac{2(\tau - \bar m) - \bar d}{2\bar d \max(1,\beta)}}9,

kk0

with kk1. This coincides with the earlier rate up to constants but without the logarithmic factor, confirming that the log term in prior analyses was suboptimal.

For kk2 the rate simplifies to kk3: at kk4 (kk5-greedy) this matches the quasi-uniform-point rate, while every increase in adaptivity contributes a dimension- and smoothness-independent gain of kk6, maximal at kk7 (kk8-greedy). This is precisely the feature that makes these schemes attractive for high-dimensional PDE approximation, and removing the logarithmic penalty strengthens that advantage. The result also extends to piecewise-smooth manifolds kk9 by splitting operators per piece — though this inflates ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d0 through a larger effective ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d1, a cost not present in the earlier estimates, which is a mild trade-off worth noting.

Limitations and open questions

The analysis inherits several assumptions. The stability estimate must hold uniformly for the problem class; it is guaranteed by maximum principles for elliptic problems but must be verified separately otherwise. The entropy bound requires smooth parametrization of the representer sets, hence smooth manifolds or extendable kernels, and the constant ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d2 grows with ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d3, degrading practical relevance when many operator pieces are needed. The result is stated for ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d4 only, since the ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d5-greedy limit case was already exhaustively treated in [Wenzel2025]. Finally, the paper is purely theoretical: no new experiments are provided, and whether the refined constant-level behavior manifests in practice remains to be confirmed numerically. An open question is whether finer allocations of the entropy budget across the ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d6 families, or non-asymptotic regime analysis, can further tighten the constants.

Conclusion

The paper delivers a clean refinement of the convergence theory for PDE-ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d7-greedy generalized interpolation with Sobolev kernels: by replacing covering-number arguments with metric entropy estimates of smoothly parametrized convex hulls, the previously observed logarithmic deterioration is shown to be removable. The resulting rates preserve the optimal quasi-uniform baseline at ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d8 while retaining the full dimension- and smoothness-independent adaptive gain for ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d9, now without penalty. Given the generality of the continuity and stability assumptions used, the same argument should apply beyond PDE collocation to broader classes of generalized interpolation problems.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.