Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Evolution of quantum geometric tensor of 1D periodic systems after a quench

Published 27 Jan 2026 in quant-ph and cond-mat.other | (2601.19152v1)

Abstract: We investigate the post-quench dynamics of the quantum geometric tensor (QGT) of 1D periodic systems with a suddenly changed Hamiltonian. The diagonal component with respect to the crystal momentum gives a metric corresponding to the variance of the time-evolved position, and its coefficient of the quadratic term in time is the group-velocity variance, signaling ballistic wavepacket dispersion. The other diagonal QGT component with respect to time reveals the energy variance. The off-diagonal QGT component features a real part as a covariance and an imaginary part representing a quench-induced curvature. Using the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model as an example, our numerical results of different quenches confirm that the post-quench QGT is governed by physical quantities and local geometric objects from the initial state and post-quench bands, such as the Berry connection, group velocities, and energy variance. Furthermore, the connections between the QGT and physical observables suggest the QGT as a comprehensive probe for nonequilibrium phenomena.

Summary

  • The paper develops a general post-quench quantum geometric tensor (QGT) framework for 1D periodic systems-four key particles are variance of the evolved group-velocity operator positions and covariances for $Q_{kk}$ and $Q_{kt}$, and the energy variance $\Delta E^{2}$.Ecotontatalgy, which is directly related to $Q_{tt}$.
  • This formalism, tested on a SSH model, demonstrates how $m=$ 2 shell regimes can alter wavepacket dispersion and quasiparticle energy variance.
  • Practical insights into quench-induced geometric spreading and energy fluctuations.

Overview

This paper by Tang, Hou, Huang, Guo, and Chien develops a general framework for the post-quench dynamics of the quantum geometric tensor (QGT) of one-dimensional periodic systems, taking λ=(k,t)\boldsymbol{\lambda}=(k,t) as the parameters and using the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model as the concrete realization (2601.19152). The central observation is that while unitary evolution generated by the same Hamiltonian leaves the QGT invariant (a U(1)U(1) gauge transformation along kk), a sudden quench breaks this symmetry and drives the state along a non-symmetric trajectory on the quantum-state manifold. The resulting QGT acquires secular terms whose coefficients are identifiable with familiar physical quantities: group-velocity variance, energy variance, Berry connections, and position–velocity covariances.

The paper's main structural result is that each component of the post-quench QGT admits an operator interpretation:

Component Physical meaning Time dependence
Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk} Variance of the time-evolved position operator gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^2
Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt} Energy variance ΔE2\Delta E^2 of HfH_f Time-independent
QktQ_{kt} Covariance Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f); imaginary part is a quench-induced curvature on the U(1)U(1)0 plane Linear growth plus oscillations

These identifications follow from recognizing that U(1)U(1)1 acts as the position operator for Bloch states and that U(1)U(1)2 brings down U(1)U(1)3 via the Schrödinger equation. The three components are further constrained by the positive-semidefiniteness of the variance-covariance matrix, giving U(1)U(1)4, which bounds geometric spreading against energy fluctuations throughout the post-quench evolution.

Operator formalism for the post-quench QGT

For a Bloch state, the quantum metric equals the variance of the maximally localized Wannier center: U(1)U(1)5. Under post-quench Heisenberg evolution with static U(1)U(1)6, the position operator integrates to U(1)U(1)7 with U(1)U(1)8, so the metric expands as

U(1)U(1)9

The dominant kk0 term has coefficient equal to the group-velocity variance, signaling ballistic wavepacket dispersion; this parallels the known kk1 scaling of Fisher information in quantum metrology [PhysRevLett.124.060402]. The temporal component reduces exactly to kk2, independent of time since the energy variance computed in the evolved state equals that of the initial state expanded in post-quench eigenstates. The off-diagonal component satisfies kk3, decomposable into a symmetrized covariance plus an antisymmetric part proportional to kk4.

A key conceptual point is why secular terms appear only after a quench. Without a quench, kk5 merely phases each momentum eigenstate — a kk6 transformation preserving kk7 (proved explicitly in the appendix). After a quench, the initial state decomposes into two eigenstates of kk8, making the effective evolution a kk9 rotation; since Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}0, the trajectory leaves the symmetry orbit of Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}1, and the linear and quadratic coefficients quantify this deviation.

Analytical results for the SSH model

Applying the formalism to the SSH chain with dimerization ratio Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}2, quenched from Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}3 to Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}4, the authors obtain closed-form expressions for all components. Writing the initial ground state as Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}5, the metric expansion reads

Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}6

with

Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}7

Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}8

Here Qkk=gkkQ_{kk} = g_{kk}9 are the pre-/post-quench Berry connections, gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^20 mixes them with the overlap factor gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^21, and gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^22 encodes the group velocity times the transition probability. The quadratic coefficient is manifestly the group-velocity variance, containing the quantum uncertainty factor gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^23. In the no-quench limit (gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^24), gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^25 and gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^26, so both secular terms vanish and the static metric is recovered — a consistency check confirmed by a general appendix proof.

The temporal component takes the compact form

gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^27

which vanishes without a quench and diverges at the gap-closing point gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^28, reflecting enhanced energy fluctuations when bands touch. Notably, gkk(0)+gkk(1)t+gkk(2)t2g_{kk}^{(0)} + g_{kk}^{(1)}t + g_{kk}^{(2)}t^29 vanishes at Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}0 because the SSH Hamiltonian there is proportional to Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}1 with Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}2-independent eigenstates — a symmetry-locking mechanism suppressing quench-induced energy variance at high-symmetry points.

The off-diagonal component obeys

Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}3

with quench-activated prefactor Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}4. Because Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}5 is odd in Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}6 while all other factors are even, Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}7 is odd under Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}8, so its Brillouin-zone integral vanishes. The authors emphasize an important distinction: the quench-induced curvature Qtt=gttQ_{tt} = g_{tt}9 is a local object on the extended ΔE2\Delta E^20 plane and carries no additional topological information, unlike the adiabatic Berry phase (ΔE2\Delta E^21 or ΔE2\Delta E^22 depending on the winding number). Even for trivial-phase parameters, nonzero local curvature fluctuations appear but integrate to zero.

Numerical results across quench protocols

Four protocols are examined: ΔE2\Delta E^23 and ΔE2\Delta E^24 (same side of the gap closing), and ΔE2\Delta E^25 and ΔE2\Delta E^26 (crossing ΔE2\Delta E^27). The momentum-resolved maps of ΔE2\Delta E^28 show quadratically growing ridges near ΔE2\Delta E^29 and oscillatory peaks at HfH_f0 where HfH_f1 extinguishes the secular terms. A clear dichotomy emerges: when the group-velocity variance is large (protocols starting near criticality with large jumps, i.e., panels (a) and (d)), the smooth ballistic HfH_f2 ridge overwhelms oscillations; when it is modest ((b) and (c)), coherent inter-band oscillations persist as visible ripples.

Two conclusions follow directly from these comparisons. First, the decisive factors governing the response are the proximity of the initial state to the gap-closing point and the magnitude of the parameter change — not whether the quench crosses the topological phase boundary. Quenches (a) and (d), which differ in whether they cross HfH_f3, produce qualitatively similar ballistic behavior, while (b) and (c) resemble each other despite also differing in topology. Second, the linear-in-time growth of HfH_f4, governed by the same coefficient HfH_f5 satisfying HfH_f6, serves as an early-time indicator of the subsequent ballistic spreading in HfH_f7.

For HfH_f8, the peak height follows the ordering HfH_f9, revealing a competition between quench strength QktQ_{kt}0 and initial closeness to criticality; the protocol QktQ_{kt}1 maximizes both factors. Since QktQ_{kt}2 sets a Mandelstam–Tamm timescale QktQ_{kt}3, the momentum-resolved temporal metric identifies which modes respond most rapidly after the quench — though the actual oscillation frequency remains set by the spectrum QktQ_{kt}4, so QktQ_{kt}5 bounds rather than determines the dynamics.

For QktQ_{kt}6, the sign of QktQ_{kt}7 near QktQ_{kt}8 acts as a direct marker of the quench direction (QktQ_{kt}9 versus Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)0): the sign flips between protocols (a) and (d) because Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)1 changes sign across Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)2 (analyzed in detail in the appendix, including the divergence Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)3 near criticality).

Limitations and open questions

The analysis is restricted to single-particle, noninteracting two-band systems in one dimension with periodic boundary conditions; interactions, disorder, higher dimensions, and mixed states lie outside its scope. The identification of Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)4 with position variance relies on the crystal-momentum parametrization and the Wannier-center construction, so its extension to other parameter choices is not established here. The claim that the quench-induced curvature Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)5 carries no topological content is demonstrated only for the SSH model, where oddness in Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)6 forces a vanishing integral; whether analogous curvatures can yield nonzero integrals, or connect to dynamical topological invariants, in other models remains open. Finally, the paper establishes the QGT as a diagnostic of nonequilibrium dynamics but does not address experimental extraction of the full Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)7-dependent tensor, leaving open how the predicted secular and oscillatory structures could be resolved in time- or momentum-resolved spectroscopies such as those already used to measure equilibrium QGTs.

Conclusion

The paper shows that the full QGT, evaluated with respect to Cov(x^,Hf)\mathrm{Cov}(\hat{x}, H_f)8 after a quantum quench, decomposes into physically transparent pieces: a metric growing ballistically with coefficient equal to the group-velocity variance, a time-independent energy variance, and a covariance whose real part grows linearly and whose imaginary part constitutes a quench-induced local curvature. For the SSH model, closed-form expressions demonstrate that the post-quench geometry is controlled by the Berry connections, group velocities, energy variance, and band overlaps of the initial and final Hamiltonians — with enhancement near the gap-closing point — rather than by the equilibrium topological invariant itself. These results position the QGT as a comprehensive, momentum-resolved probe of nonequilibrium phenomena, complementing existing spectroscopic and tomographic measurements of quantum geometry.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.