Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Capillary Orlicz-Minkowski flow in the upper half-space

Published 21 Jan 2026 in math.DG | (2601.14659v1)

Abstract: In this paper, we study the long-time existence and asymptotic behavior of an anisotropic capillary Gauss curvature flow. By studying this flow and proving its convergence to a stationary solution, we establish a new existence result for the capillary Orlicz-Minkowski problem without the evenness assumption, and provide a flow approach to the existence of smooth solutions.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper proves long-time existence and smooth subsequential convergence for the capillary Orlicz–Minkowski flow for any smooth strictly convex $f$. It introduces a boundary value problem under the capillary Orlicz-Minkowski equation, extending evenness results to the non-even case.
  • The flow method ensures smooth long-time existence and a subsequence convergence of the strictly convex capillary boundary condition, skipping the evenness assumption.
  • For $n = 2$ and $p = 1$, the capillary Minkowski problem can be solved without any evenness or symmetry assumption on $f$

Background and problem statement

The classical Minkowski problem asks for a closed convex hypersurface in Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} whose Gauss curvature equals a prescribed positive function ff on Sn\mathbb{S}^n, equivalently the Monge–Ampère equation det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1} for the support function hh. Its generalizations — the LpL_p-Minkowski problem of Lutwak and the Orlicz–Minkowski problem of Haberl, Lutwak, Yang, and Zhang (2601.14659) — have been studied extensively via both variational methods and geometric flows.

The capillary setting concerns convex hypersurfaces ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}} meeting the boundary plane at a constant contact angle θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi). Mei, Wang, and Weng introduced the capillary Minkowski problem and solved it for θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2] using the continuity method; subsequent work addressed even and non-even cases of the capillary LpL_p-Minkowski problem, with Hu–Hu–Ivaki resolving the even case for all ff0 and the non-even case for ff1 via geometric flows. Independently, Wang and Zhu formulated a capillary Orlicz–Minkowski problem as a Robin boundary value problem of Monge–Ampère type, but their existence theorem requires an even prescribed function ff2. The paper under review supplies the corresponding non-even existence result by flow methods.

Main results

Let ff3 denote the unit capillary spherical cap, ff4 its capillary support function, and ff5 the capillary Gauss map. The paper studies the boundary value problem

ff6

where ff7 is smooth. Taking ff8 recovers the capillary ff9-Minkowski equation. The main analytic assumption is

Sn\mathbb{S}^n0

the same condition used by Bryan–Ivaki–Scheuer and Liu–Lu for the classical (dual) Orlicz–Minkowski problems. Notably, this condition holds when Sn\mathbb{S}^n1 with Sn\mathbb{S}^n2, so the theorem subsumes the non-even capillary Sn\mathbb{S}^n3 result of Hu–Hu–Ivaki in that range.

Theorem A (existence). For Sn\mathbb{S}^n4, any positive Sn\mathbb{S}^n5 satisfying the above condition, there exists a smooth strictly convex solution to the capillary Orlicz–Minkowski equation — without any evenness or symmetry assumption on Sn\mathbb{S}^n6.

Theorem B (flow convergence). Starting from any smooth strictly convex capillary hypersurface with positive capillary support function, the anisotropic capillary Gauss curvature flow

Sn\mathbb{S}^n7

with the capillary boundary condition Sn\mathbb{S}^n8, exists smoothly for all time, and a subsequence converges in Sn\mathbb{S}^n9 to a smooth strictly convex stationary solution of the above equation.

Method: a priori estimates along the flow

Under the inverse capillary Gauss map parametrization, the flow becomes a parabolic scalar equation for det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}0 with Robin boundary data:

det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}1

The long-time existence argument proceeds through uniform estimates:

  • det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}2 bound: applied to det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}3, which satisfies an oblique Neumann-type condition det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}4 on det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}5. At interior minima of det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}6, strict convexity gives det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}7, so the evolution inequality det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}8 combined with the asymptotic condition on det(2h+hσ)=f1\det(\nabla^2 h + h\sigma) = f^{-1}9 pins hh0 between time-independent constants. This is where the structural hypothesis on hh1 enters decisively.
  • hh2 bound: the auxiliary function hh3 is controlled by a maximum principle argument; at boundary maxima the relation hh4 reduces the estimate to the hh5 bound times hh6.
  • Gauss curvature bounds: an upper bound follows from the auxiliary quantity hh7, whose evolution satisfies hh8; the negative hh9 term forces LpL_p0 bounded above. The lower bound uses LpL_p1 with large LpL_p2; a key claim verified at the boundary is LpL_p3, which relies on the identity LpL_p4 together with LpL_p5.
  • Principal curvature bounds: with LpL_p6 bounded both ways, an upper bound on principal radii follows from LpL_p7 for large LpL_p8. The delicate part is the boundary analysis: two cases are distinguished depending on whether LpL_p9 dominates ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}0, and in the second case either ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}1 or a direct time-independent bound is obtained from the ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}2 estimate. This circumvents the extra difficulty that ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}3 estimates typically pose at capillary boundaries.

With ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}4 uniformly bounded, standard parabolic regularity theory for fully nonlinear equations with oblique boundary conditions yields ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}5 bounds for all ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}6, hence long-time existence.

Convergence via a monotone functional

Convergence is obtained through the functional

ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}7

where ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}8 denotes enclosed volume. Using the first variation formula ΣR+n+1\Sigma \subset \overline{\mathbb{R}_+^{n+1}}9 for capillary convex bodies, one computes

θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)0

with equality exactly at stationary solutions. Monotonicity plus the uniform estimates imply that along a sequence θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)1 the limit θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)2 exists and satisfies θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)3, hence θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)4 pointwise. The boundary condition is inherited from the flow. This establishes both theorems simultaneously.

Relation to prior work and scope of assumptions

Compared with Wang–Zhu's elliptic approach, which requires θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)5 even and θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)6 convex, increasing, log-concave with θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)7, the present result imposes no symmetry on θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)8; instead it requires the asymptotic condition linking θ(0,π)\theta \in (0,\pi)9 to θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]0. The authors note these two sets of hypotheses are independent, so neither result contains the other. The restriction θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]1 matches the range in most of the capillary literature but leaves open whether the flow converges for obtuse contact angles θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]2. Convergence is established only along a subsequence rather than for the full family θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]3 as θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]4; uniqueness of the limiting solution and full-time convergence are not addressed. The asymptotic condition also excludes some admissible θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]5 (e.g., certain growth regimes near θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]6 or θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]7), and extending existence beyond it remains open.

Conclusion

This paper extends the flow approach to Minkowski-type problems to the capillary Orlicz setting. By establishing uniform θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]8, θ(0,π/2]\theta \in (0,\pi/2]9, Gauss curvature, and principal curvature estimates for an anisotropic capillary Gauss curvature flow, and by identifying a volume-normalized Lyapunov functional decreasing along the flow, the authors prove smooth long-time existence and subsequential convergence, thereby yielding the first existence theorem for the capillary Orlicz–Minkowski problem without evenness assumptions. The result covers the non-even capillary LpL_p0-Minkowski problem for LpL_p1 as a special case and complements the elliptic, symmetric theory of Wang–Zhu.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.