Regular Cyclic $(q+1)$-Arcs in $\PG(3,2^m)$: Spectral Rigidity, Descent, and an MDS Criterion
Abstract: Let $q=2m$ with $m\ge 3$ and set $n:=q+1$. We investigate $(q+1)$-arcs $\mathcal A\subset \mathrm{PG}(3,q)$ that admit a regular cyclic subgroup $C\le \mathrm{PGL}(4,q)$ of order $n$. Over $K=\mathbb{F}{q2}$, such an action can be conjugated to a diagonal one, producing explicit cyclic monomial models [ \mathcal M_a = {[1:t:ta:t{a+1}]:t\in U_n}\subset \mathrm{PG}(3,K), \qquad U_n={u\in K\times:un=1}, ] with $a\in(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})\times$. We develop a spectral rigidity principle to obtain a precise descent criterion: $\mathcal M_a$ is $K$-projectively equivalent to a $(q+1)$-arc defined over $\mathbb{F}_q$ if and only if $a\equiv \pm 2e \pmod n$ for some integer $e$ with $\gcd(e,m)=1$. Consequently, regular cyclic pairs $(\mathcal A,C)$ fall into exactly $\varphi(m)/2$ $K$-projective equivalence classes. As an immediate coding-theoretic application, we resolve the remaining AMDS/MDS dichotomy for the BCH family $\mathcal C{(q,q+1,3,h)}$ studied by Xu et al.: $\mathcal C_{(q,q+1,3,h)}$ is MDS if and only if $2h+1\equiv \pm 2e \pmod n$ for some $e$ with $\gcd(e,m)=1$. The underlying spectral rigidity step is formulated in a general setting for diagonal regular cyclic pairs in $\mathrm{PG}(r,K)$, providing a portable reduction of projective equivalence questions to explicit congruences on exponent data.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.