Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On exponentially height-penalized random trees

Published 19 Dec 2025 in math.PR and math.CO | (2512.17747v1)

Abstract: Given $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $μ\in \mathbb{R}$, a $\textit{$μ$-height-biased tree of size $n$}$ is a random plane tree $\mathbf{\mathbf{T}}n$ with $n$ vertices with law given by $\mathbb{P}(\mathbf{T}=t) \propto e{-μh(t)}$, where $t$ ranges over fixed plane trees with $n$ vertices, and $h(t)$ is the height of $t$. Fix a sequence $(μ_n){n \ge 1}$ of real numbers, and for $n \ge 1$ let $\mathbf{T}_n$ be a $μ$-height-biased tree of size $n$. Durhuus and Ünel (2023) described the asymptotic behaviour of $h(\mathbf{T}_n)$ when $μ_n \equiv μ\in \mathbb{R}$ is fixed. In this work, we extend their results to arbitrary sequences of positive parameters depending on $n$. Most notably, we show that such a tree behaves like a height-biased Continuum Random Tree (CRT) when $μ_n$ is of order $1/\sqrt{n}$; that its height is asymptotically $(2π2n/μ_n){1/3}$ when $μ_n$ is of larger order than $1/\sqrt{n}$ and of smaller order than $n$; and that its height converges to a fixed constant when $μ_n$ is of order at least $n$, with some random jumps under specific conditions on $μ_n$. We additionally prove various results on second order behaviours, and large deviation principles for the height, for different regimes of $μ_n$. Finally, we describe new statistics of these trees, covering their widths, their root degrees, and the local structure around their roots.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.