Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A short introduction to boundary symmetries

Published 18 Dec 2025 in hep-th and gr-qc | (2512.16810v1)

Abstract: Support material for lectures at the Mai '25 Galileo Galilei Institute school on asymptotic symmetries and flat holography. Contains an introduction to Noether theorem for gauge theories and gravity, covariant phase space formalism, boundary and asymptotic symmetries, future null infinity in Bondi-Sachs coordinates and in Penrose conformal compactification, BMS symmetries and their charges and fluxes. Includes an original and pedagogical derivation of the BMS group using only Minkowski, and an original derivation of an integral Hamiltonian generator for a scalar field on a null hypersurface.

Summary

  • The paper establishes a covariant phase space framework to derive well-defined conserved charges from boundary symmetries.
  • It highlights how ambiguities from boundary Lagrangians and corner terms impact the symplectic structure and integrability of canonical generators.
  • It provides an in-depth treatment of the BMS group, detailing its algebra, physical charges, and implications for gravitational radiation and soft theorems.

Boundary Symmetries in Gauge Theories and Gravity


Conceptual Framework and Motivation

The study of boundary symmetries is crucial for understanding the physical implications of gauge degrees of freedom, particularly in theories with nontrivial boundary conditions. While gauge symmetries typically map physically equivalent states, the presence of boundaries renders certain residual gauge transformations physically distinguishable. Specifically, boundary or asymptotic symmetries—such as the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs (BMS) group at null infinity—play an instrumental role by generating non-redundant transformations that can alter conserved quantities and fluxes, e.g., energy and angular momentum radiated by gravitational waves.

In the context of the covariant phase space formalism, boundary symmetries are discussed as residual gauge transformations compatible with the imposed boundary conditions. The symplectic structure, constructed covariantly, admits ambiguities through boundary and corner terms, and the treatment must account for these to ensure physically meaningful charges. The interplay between gauge redundancies and physical symmetries is clarified by a nuanced analysis of Noether’s theorem, which must be appropriately generalized for gauge and gravitational theories.


Covariant Phase Space, Ambiguities, and Boundary Conditions

The essay establishes the covariant phase space methodology as foundational for analyzing symmetries, especially in general-covariant systems like gravity. By dispensing with a preferred time slicing, this formalism equips the set of classical solutions with a symplectic structure derived from the variational properties of the Lagrangian, resulting in well-defined symplectic currents and potentials.

Two categories of ambiguities impact the symplectic structure:

  • Boundary Lagrangians: Adding a total derivative to the action modifies the symplectic potential but not the symplectic 2-form, analogous to changes in polarization in Hamiltonian mechanics (e.g., switching from Dirichlet to Neumann boundary conditions).
  • Corner Terms: Enriching the symplectic potential by an exact form in field space introduces modifications to the symplectic 2-form, especially relevant for null boundaries and in the presence of leaky (dissipative) boundaries.

These ambiguities are not mere technical subtleties; they have direct implications for the definition and conservation of charges associated with boundary symmetries. Recent work has utilized these freedoms for "symplectic renormalization," enabling the extraction of meaningful charges in the presence of divergent or anomalous terms [Harlow & Wu (Harlow et al., 2019), Freidel et al. (Freidel et al., 2020), Odak et al. (Odak et al., 2022)].


Noether’s Theorem in Gauge Theories and Gravitational Systems

Noether’s theorem, generalized for systems with gauge symmetry, reveals two pivotal results:

  1. Conservation Laws Associated with Symmetries: For a differentiable symmetry, the current is conserved on-shell.
  2. Codimension-2 Surface Charges for Gauge Symmetries: In gauge theories and gravity, local gauge transformations yield Noether currents that are exact forms, so that charges integrate to corners (codimension-2 surfaces), exemplified by the electric flux for Maxwell and Komar integrals for General Relativity.

Physical conserved charges, such as ADM or BMS charges in gravity, manifest as non-trivial elements of this construction only for certain residual symmetries compatible with the boundary or asymptotic structure of the spacetime. The realization of charges and fluxes further depends on the chosen representative in the equivalence class of covariant phase space structures—a fact exploited systematically in recent advances [Odak et al. (Odak et al., 2022), Freidel et al. (Freidel et al., 2021)].


Structure of Boundary Symmetries: BMS Group

An extensive and pedagogical treatment is given to the BMS group, both from the intrinsic geometry of future null infinity (I+\mathscr{I}^+) and via explicit calculations in Minkowski space, offering an original derivation without recourse to asymptotic expansions. The BMS group—SL(2,C)Diff(S2)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})\ltimes \mathrm{Diff}(S^2)—generalizes the Poincaré group by allowing angle-dependent translations (“supertranslations”), yielding an infinite-dimensional symmetry algebra relevant at null infinity.

Main results clarified in the essay include:

  • Generators: The BMS algebra is generated by vector fields preserving the universal conformal structure of I+\mathscr{I}^+, extending global translations with arbitrary functions on the sphere.
  • Charges and Fluxes: Explicit expressions for BMS charges (supermomentum, angular momentum) and their associated fluxes are given. Charges are shown to be integrable over spheroidal cross-sections at null infinity, while fluxes describe radiative loss between cuts.

The work reviews four complementary approaches for deriving these expressions (Ashtekar-Streubel, Wald-Zoupas, improved Noether charge, Barnich-Brandt bracket), establishing their equivalence and practical differences.


Canonical Generators, Dissipation, and Integrability

A prominent theme is the distinction between Hamiltonian symmetries, whose generators are phase space functions, and more general (possibly nonintegrable) transformations—especially in dissipative contexts with radiative fluxes. The non-integrability problem for canonical generators at null infinity is resolved by careful treatment of the symplectic structure and by introducing suitable mathematical topologies into field space [Ashtekar & Speziale (Ashtekar et al., 2024)].

The essay outlines the generalized Wald-Zoupas prescription for the selection of preferred symplectic potentials and charges, emphasizing two criteria:

  1. Covariance: Background independence under symmetry action, ensuring physically meaningful charges.
  2. Stationarity: Charges vanish in reference “non-radiative” (stationary) solutions.

These constraints guarantee the centerless realization of the BMS charge algebra without anomalous cocycles [Rignon-Bret & Speziale (Rignon-Bret et al., 2024, Rignon-Bret et al., 2024)].


Theoretical and Practical Implications

Boundary symmetry analysis shapes numerous areas of contemporary theoretical physics:

  • Soft Theorems and Holography: The connection between BMS symmetries and infrared soft theorems (Strominger program), as well as the emergence of celestial and Carrollian holography.
  • Quantum Gravity: The interplay between asymptotic symmetries, edge modes, entanglement charges, and their role in black hole information and memory effects.
  • Radiative Spacetimes and Experimental Signatures: Predictive consequences for gravitational wave observations and flux-balance laws.

The framework outlined in the essay sets methodological standards for future exploration of higher spin generalizations, extended symmetry algebras beyond BMS, and precise treatments of boundaries in gravitational and gauge theoretic models.


Conclusion

This paper (2512.16810) presents a comprehensive and technically detailed account of boundary symmetries in gauge theories and gravitational systems, distilling influential structural insights from Noether’s theorem, covariant phase space formalism, and the modern treatment of asymptotic symmetries. The unified perspective offered for the BMS group and associated charges integrates multiple foundational methods and clarifies outstanding conceptual challenges regarding ambiguities, integrability, and covariance. The implications reach from the classical resolution of flux-balance laws to quantum and holographic approaches, presenting a versatile platform for further research in mathematical and physical aspects of boundary symmetries.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 39 likes about this paper.