Tensor Logic: The Language of AI (2510.12269v2)
Abstract: Progress in AI is hindered by the lack of a programming language with all the requisite features. Libraries like PyTorch and TensorFlow provide automatic differentiation and efficient GPU implementation, but are additions to Python, which was never intended for AI. Their lack of support for automated reasoning and knowledge acquisition has led to a long and costly series of hacky attempts to tack them on. On the other hand, AI languages like LISP an Prolog lack scalability and support for learning. This paper proposes tensor logic, a language that solves these problems by unifying neural and symbolic AI at a fundamental level. The sole construct in tensor logic is the tensor equation, based on the observation that logical rules and Einstein summation are essentially the same operation, and all else can be reduced to them. I show how to elegantly implement key forms of neural, symbolic and statistical AI in tensor logic, including transformers, formal reasoning, kernel machines and graphical models. Most importantly, tensor logic makes new directions possible, such as sound reasoning in embedding space. This combines the scalability and learnability of neural networks with the reliability and transparency of symbolic reasoning, and is potentially a basis for the wider adoption of AI.
Sponsored by Paperpile, the PDF & BibTeX manager trusted by top AI labs.
Get 30 days freePaper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Explain it Like I'm 14
What this paper is about
This paper argues that AI needs its own “native” programming language, the way physics needed calculus and the web needed HTML. The author proposes a new language called tensor logic. Its big idea: bring together two very different styles of AI—neural networks (numbers and matrices) and symbolic reasoning (rules and logic)—using one simple building block, the tensor equation. With this, the same language can describe and run deep learning models like transformers and also perform logical reasoning, and even mix the two safely and clearly.
The big questions the paper asks
- Can we design one language that is good at both learning from data (like deep neural networks) and reasoning with rules (like logic systems)?
- Can we make AI models more reliable and understandable, not just powerful?
- Is there a simple, common core that unifies “neural” AI and “symbolic” AI?
How the authors approach the problem
Two ideas to connect: tensors and logic
- A tensor is like a multi-dimensional spreadsheet: a table, or a stack of tables, or a cube of numbers. Computers can multiply and add tensors very fast.
- A logical rule is like: “Aunt(x, z) if Sister(x, y) and Parent(y, z).” That means: x is z’s aunt if x is y’s sister and y is z’s parent.
- The key insight: a logical rule is basically the same as a certain kind of tensor operation (called an Einstein summation, or einsum), plus a simple “clip” that turns any positive number into 1 and everything else into 0. In everyday terms: “find all y that match both facts, multiply those matches, add across y, then turn ‘any match’ into true.”
One simple language rule: tensor equations
- The entire language is just equations that combine tensors. Think of it like LEGO: every model—neural network, logic program, or probability model—is built by snapping together the same kind of pieces.
- Two important operations:
- Join: line up and multiply tensors where their labels match (like matching columns in two databases).
- Projection: “sum out” the labels you no longer need (like keeping only certain columns).
- Because logic facts can be stored as very sparse tensors (mostly zeros), logic programs and database queries can be run using the same tensor math that powers deep learning.
How programs run and learn
- Running programs (inference):
- Forward chaining: start from known facts/data, keep applying equations to discover new results until nothing new appears.
- Backward chaining: start from a question, and look up only what you need by following equations backward to their inputs.
- Learning (training):
- Since everything is one kind of equation, taking gradients (the math used in backpropagation) is simple and systematic.
- This lets the language learn parameters for neural nets and also weights inside rule-like structures, all in the same framework.
What they built and showed
To demonstrate tensor logic, the paper sketches how a wide variety of AI systems fit into this single language. Here are the highlights:
- Neural networks
- Perceptrons, multilayer perceptrons, and recurrent neural nets are short tensor equations.
- Convolutional neural networks (used for images) and graph neural networks (used for networks like social graphs or molecules) also drop in neatly.
- Transformers and attention (used in LLMs) can be written in roughly a dozen equations: compute queries/keys/values, compare them, and blend results. It’s the same tensor math throughout.
- Symbolic reasoning
- Logic rules and databases (like “parent,” “ancestor,” “aunt”) are represented as sparse Boolean tensors.
- Running a logic program is the same as running tensor equations with joins and projections.
- Kernel machines and probabilistic models
- Kernel methods (like support vector machines with polynomial or Gaussian kernels) are straightforward tensor equations.
- Probabilistic graphical models (Bayesian networks, factor graphs) map cleanly to tensors: multiplying factors is a join; marginalizing variables is a projection.
- Reasoning in embedding space
- Embeddings turn objects and relations into vectors and tensors, like compressing a whole dictionary into a coordinate system.
- The paper shows how to store facts and even rules inside embeddings so you can do “fuzzy but reliable” reasoning: similar objects can share evidence, yet you can dial the system to be fully strict (no “hallucinations”) by lowering a temperature parameter.
- Scaling up
- Dense parts run on GPUs as usual.
- Sparse parts can run via smart database-like operations, or be converted into compact dense forms using tensor decompositions (like Tucker decomposition) to speed everything up with only a tiny, controllable error.
Why this matters
- One simple core for all of AI: Instead of using Python plus many separate libraries and hacks, tensor logic lets you express learning and reasoning in one consistent way.
- Clarity and reliability: Because the program is just math equations, it’s easier to inspect, test, and understand. You can make reasoning strictly logical (no made-up answers) by setting temperature low.
- Power and flexibility: The same language handles transformers, logic programs, graph models, and more. You can mix rules and embeddings to get both exact reasoning and analogy-based generalization.
What could this change in the future
- A common language for AI could speed up research and make systems easier to build, share, and debug—like how calculus transformed physics.
- Safer AI assistants: “Reasoning in embedding space” may reduce hallucinations while keeping the ability to generalize, leading to more trustworthy AI tools.
- Education and tooling: With one consistent “grammar” for AI, it may become easier to learn and teach complex ideas, and to build better integrated development tools.
- Ecosystem growth: If tensor logic slots into today’s Python workflows and GPU hardware, it could gradually replace scattered libraries with a cleaner, unified approach.
In short, the paper’s main message is that a single, simple language based on tensor equations can unify neural networks and logical reasoning, making AI systems both powerful and understandable—and opening the door to new, reliable ways of thinking and learning.
Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge Gaps, Limitations, and Open Questions
Below is a single, concrete list of what remains missing, uncertain, or unexplored in the paper, framed to guide future research and implementation work:
- Formal semantics and proofs: Provide a rigorous denotational and operational semantics for tensor logic, and formal proofs of equivalence (or precise conditions for equivalence) between Datalog rules and tensor equations/einsums with step functions, including soundness and completeness.
- Nonmonotonic features: Specify how tensor logic handles negation-as-failure, explicit negation, aggregates (e.g., count, min, max), stratification, and recursion with negation—common in practical logic programming but not covered here.
- Set vs. bag semantics: Clarify whether relations/tensors are treated under set or multiset semantics and how duplicates from joins and projections are normalized (step vs. alternative aggregators), and the implications for logical correctness.
- Functions and unification: Detail an explicit algorithmic and semantic design for unification in tensor logic (term representation, occurs-check, variable binding, substitution), and show how function symbols and nested terms are represented with tensors.
- Safety and termination: Define safety conditions (range-restriction of variables), termination criteria, and fixpoint guarantees for forward chaining over tensor equations that include nonlinearities and recursive index functions.
- Associativity/commutativity claims: Precisely characterize when einsum operations are associative/commutative in tensor logic (given index structure and nonlinearity), and identify cases (e.g., matrix multiplication) where commutativity does not hold and how that affects rule composition.
- Type and shape systems: Specify the type system and shape inference (including mixed Boolean/real/integer types), static checks for index consistency, broadcasting rules, and error handling for malformed equations.
- Step functions and differentiability: Address how learning proceeds through non-differentiable step functions, including surrogate gradients, straight-through estimators, or alternative smooth thresholds; analyze the impact on convergence and stability.
- Gradient correctness and control flow: Formalize automatic differentiation through tensor logic programs that exhibit conditional execution, recursion, and virtual indices; detail gradient accumulation, reuse, and memory management (e.g., checkpointing).
- Optimizer design: Provide concrete optimization algorithms suitable for large tensor logic programs (learning rate schedules, adaptive methods, regularization, weight sharing), and give convergence analyses or empirical evidence on typical workloads.
- Learning program structure: Beyond parameter learning, develop methods to learn the structure of equations/rules (predicate invention, rank selection in Tucker decompositions, index topology), with criteria for interpretability and constraints to prevent degenerate solutions.
- Predicate invention via decompositions: Establish principled procedures for turning learned decompositions (e.g., Tucker) into discrete predicates, including thresholding schemes, identifiability conditions, semantic validation, and robustness across datasets.
- Embedding-based reasoning error bounds: Derive tight, cumulative error bounds for multi-step inference in embedding space under random and learned embeddings, factoring set sizes, chaining depth, soft/step thresholds, and temperature; provide guidance for choosing embedding dimensions D.
- Temperature-controlled reasoning: Give a formal account of the “temperature” parameter’s effect on deductive vs. analogical reasoning, correct the limiting behavior at T→0 (sigmoid discontinuities at x=0), and specify rule-specific temperature tuning protocols.
- Hallucination claims: Substantiate the “immune to hallucinations at low temperature” claim with formal guarantees or empirical stress tests, including adversarial queries, distribution shift, and compounding errors in long derivations.
- Scaling via Tucker decomposition: Quantify the computational and statistical trade-offs of dense approximations (time/memory complexity, approximation error, accuracy vs. D), and develop principled strategies for denoising and re-thresholding during large-scale pipelines.
- Sparse–dense integration: Specify the architecture for the “separation of concerns” approach (GPU kernels + database engine), including join algorithms, indexing, cost models, scheduling, caching, and consistency between relational and tensor representations.
- GPU implementation details: Provide kernels and runtime strategies for mixed-type tensors, Boolean operations, integer division in indices, virtual indices, and nonlinearity; address numerical stability (mixed precision, normalization) and performance profiling.
- Backpropagation through structure at scale: Detail algorithms and memory strategies for BPTS across large, dynamic derivations; define stopping/truncation criteria (e.g., for RNNs), gradient reuse, and variance reduction techniques.
- Probabilistic graphical models: Elaborate on building join trees (variable elimination order, treewidth), handling cycles (loopy BP damping, convergence criteria), continuous variables (e.g., Gaussian factors), and numeric stability of normalization Z under tensor logic.
- Sampling in tensor logic: Formalize “selective projection” for Monte Carlo (proposal distributions, unbiasedness, variance, mixing diagnostics), and compare to standard MCMC methods in terms of correctness and efficiency.
- Transformer completeness: Add necessary components omitted in the sketch (causal/attention masks, dropout, residual MLP normalization order, parameter tying), and demonstrate how data-dependent shapes (variable-length sequences) and batching are handled in tensor logic.
- Syntax and parsing: Define the language grammar (including syntactic sugar), name scoping, module system, file I/O semantics for tensors and relations, and how external procedural attachments are type-checked and sandboxed.
- Program determinism and equation accumulation: Clarify semantics when multiple equations share a LHS (implicit summation), conflict resolution, ordering effects, and guarantees of referential transparency in forward/backward chaining.
- Benchmarks and empirical validation: Provide end-to-end empirical results comparing tensor logic to Python+PyTorch/JAX and neurosymbolic baselines on reasoning, learning, and hybrid tasks (accuracy, speed, memory, interpretability).
- Integration with existing ecosystems: Specify Python interoperability (FFI, autograd interop, data loaders), migration paths from einsum-heavy codebases, and compatibility with major numerical libraries and hardware backends.
- Debugging and tooling: Design debugging aids (shape tracing, index visualization, gradient checks, provenance of inferred tensors), testing frameworks, IDE integrations, and static analysis tools tailored to tensor logic.
- Security and robustness: Investigate adversarial vulnerabilities in embedding-based reasoning, resilience to noisy inputs/knowledge bases, and methods for certifying answers (e.g., extracting proofs/certificates from embedded inference).
- Multi-modal and streaming data: Extend tensor logic ingestion and processing semantics to ragged tensors, variable-width indices, online/streaming updates, and cross-modal fusion (text–image–graph) with consistent index management.
- Licensing and governance: Define the open-source licensing, governance model, and roadmap for community contributions (standard libraries, reference implementations, compliance tests), supporting sustainable adoption.
Practical Applications
Immediate Applications
These applications can be prototyped or deployed now by leveraging existing tensor libraries (e.g., PyTorch/NumPy einsum), Datalog engines, and GPU compute, while adopting the tensor-logic programming model.
- Unified neurosymbolic prototyping environment
- Sector: software, academia
- What: Build models that integrate logic rules and neural components in a single program using tensor equations (einsum + step/nonlinearities), with forward/backward chaining and auto-diff.
- Tools/workflow: Implement tensor-logic-style programs in PyTorch/JAX as thin DSL layers over einsum, use autograd, and integrate Datalog-like rule parsing.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Availability of a thin DSL or library; developers comfortable with einsum; rules/data convertible to Boolean/numeric tensors.
- “Sound RAG” pipeline (retrieval + reasoning without hallucinations at T≈0)
- Sector: enterprise software, knowledge management, legal, customer support
- What: Replace LLM-only RAG with tensor-logic reasoning in embedding space; compute deductive closure of retrieved facts under rules at temperature T=0 for sound answers, optionally increase T for analogical reasoning.
- Tools/workflow: Document ingestion to Boolean tensors; rule authoring in Datalog/TL; embedding store; forward chaining with temperature-controlled sigmoids; thresholding and re-embedding when needed.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Sufficient embedding dimension to reduce false positives; curated rules; GPU for scaling; tolerance for small approximate-errors if using random embeddings.
- Transparent decision support with explainable chains of reasoning
- Sector: healthcare (clinical decision support), finance (credit/risk), compliance
- What: Encode guidelines/policies as TL rules; combine with learned embeddings for generalization; extract intermediate tensors for step-by-step explanations.
- Tools/workflow: TL program with temperature settings per rule (T=0 for hard constraints, higher T for soft evidence); visualization of intermediate tensors; audit logs.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Access to validated rules; governance for updates; embedding training aligned with domain concepts.
- Graph analytics via GNNs in tensor logic
- Sector: finance (fraud rings), cybersecurity (network intrusion), e-commerce (recommendations), biology (molecules)
- What: Implement node/edge/graph classification with aggregation via joins; exploit permutation-invariant message passing as in the paper’s GNN template.
- Tools/workflow: Neig(x,y) relations as adjacency; embeddings per layer; GPU-backed sparse join kernels or neighborhood iteration.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Graph sparsity; scalable neighbor aggregation; training labels.
- Transformer-based NLP tasks in a concise TL style
- Sector: software, education, enterprise NLP
- What: Re-implement attention, multi-head blocks, layer norms, and MLPs using TL equations; educate teams/students with a minimal, readable model spec.
- Tools/workflow: PyTorch/JAX implementations mapped from TL equations; autoregressive decoding; unit tests tracing attention computations.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Existing transformer tooling; compute budget for training/inference.
- Probabilistic graphical models re-expressed in TL
- Sector: healthcare (diagnosis), operations research, reliability engineering
- What: Encode CPTs and factors as tensors; perform inference via projection (marginalization) and joins (pointwise product); use join trees for exact inference on small/structured models.
- Tools/workflow: Backward/forward chaining; evidence as facts; compute P(Q|E) via program ratio; fallback to loopy belief propagation or sampling.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Model treewidth manageable for exact inference; sampling kernels available for approximate inference.
- Kernel methods integrated alongside deep/logic components
- Sector: finance (anomaly detection), manufacturing (quality control), bioinformatics
- What: Plug polynomial/Gaussian kernels into TL pipelines for hybrid models (e.g., logic constraints + kernel classifier).
- Tools/workflow: Gram matrix as tensor; equations for kernels as per the paper; SGD with auto-diff.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Kernel scalability (O(n2)) or approximations (Nyström, random features).
- Database-style reasoning with GPU-accelerated joins/projections
- Sector: data engineering, analytics, knowledge graphs
- What: Map joins to tensor joins and projections; accelerate selective queries and rule-based materialization with GPUs.
- Tools/workflow: Separation-of-concerns approach—use DB engine for sparse relations and GPUs for dense subtensors; or micro-batching joins.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Efficient data layouts; query optimizer interop; schema-to-tensor mapping.
- Education: a minimal, unified AI language for teaching
- Sector: education
- What: Curriculum modules that teach logic programming, neural networks, graphical models, and auto-diff under a single tensor-equation paradigm.
- Tools/workflow: Jupyter-based TL exercises; visualizers for joins, projections, and backprop-through-structure.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Teaching materials and reference implementations; faculty training.
- Scientific computing “equations-to-code” workflows
- Sector: scientific computing, engineering
- What: Translate mathematical models to tensor equations with minimal boilerplate; control flow via logical masks; make control structure learnable by relaxing Booleans.
- Tools/workflow: TL-style DSL over CUDA/PyTorch; unit tests aligning paper equations to code; optional thresholding to re-impose logic.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Precision/performance tuning; domain validation.
- Debuggable, testable AI programs via procedural semantics
- Sector: software engineering, MLOps
- What: Treat each TL equation as a function; backward chaining for queries; unit-test intermediate tensors; enforce invariants with step/threshold operators.
- Tools/workflow: Static checks on index alignment; tracing of gradient programs (as TL equations).
- Dependencies/assumptions: Good IDE support and linters; discipline in index naming.
Long-Term Applications
These require further research, scaling, or core runtime development (e.g., a production TL compiler, CUDA kernels, Tucker-based GPU backends, and ecosystem/tooling).
- Production-grade tensor logic runtime and compiler
- Sector: software, platforms
- What: A full TL language with auto-diff, sparse-dense fusion, CUDA kernels, and Python interop to supersede bespoke PyTorch/Numpy code for AI + reasoning.
- Tools/workflow: IDE with step-by-step chain-of-thought tensor inspection; graph compilers; autotuning.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Robust open-source community; performance parity with leading DL frameworks.
- Tucker-based GPU engine for sparse logic at scale
- Sector: data platforms, analytics
- What: Convert sparse Boolean tensors to dense cores + factors (Tucker) for exponentially efficient GPU operations; denoise with step functions.
- Tools/workflow: Automatic randomized/learned decompositions; error bounds tied to embedding dimension; incremental updates.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Controlled false-positive rates; efficient decomposition updates; memory management for large cores.
- Enterprise-grade “reasoning in embedding space” systems
- Sector: enterprise search, legal/compliance, biomedical discovery
- What: Multi-tenant systems that combine deductive closure (T=0) with analogical reasoning (T>0), rule sets with per-rule temperatures, and verification layers.
- Tools/workflow: Rule governance; evidence provenance; threshold/re-embed cycles for error control; mixed-initiative rule authoring.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Scalable embedding stores; domain ontologies; human-in-the-loop curation.
- Safety-critical AI with verifiable neurosymbolic guarantees
- Sector: healthcare devices, autonomous systems, aerospace, finance
- What: Certify components operating at T=0 for soundness; isolate analogical layers with guard rules; generate formal proofs via extractable intermediate tensors.
- Tools/workflow: Contracts/specs as TL rules; proof extraction from backward chaining; runtime monitors on temperature.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Regulatory acceptance; formal methods integration; robust testing frameworks.
- Policy and compliance automation with traceability
- Sector: public policy, finance, HR, procurement
- What: Policy rules encoded in TL; automatic audit trails of decisions; temperature-controlled soft policies; versioning of rule sets.
- Tools/workflow: Policy IDE; differential analysis across policy versions; “explain my decision” reports from intermediate tensors.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Standardization of policy schemas; governance processes.
- Robotics and planning with learned-symbolic fusion
- Sector: robotics, logistics, industrial automation
- What: Integrate planning rules (TL rules) with perception embeddings; reason over scenes and tasks in embedding space to bridge symbolic plans and sensor data.
- Tools/workflow: Perception stack outputs embeddings; planning queries via backward chaining; T-tuning for robust perception–plan linkage.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Real-time performance on edge GPUs; robust embeddings; safe fallback plans at T=0.
- Knowledge-centric assistants that don’t hallucinate
- Sector: consumer tech, enterprise productivity
- What: Assistants that answer with deductive certainty when possible (T=0), and clearly mark analogical inferences (T>0); show transparent chains and supporting facts.
- Tools/workflow: Hybrid with LLMs for language generation but TL for reasoning core; confidence calibration tied to temperature.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Tight LLM-TL integration; UX for degrees of certainty.
- Domain-scale scientific discovery platforms
- Sector: materials science, drug discovery, climate modeling
- What: Encode mechanistic rules + probabilistic models + neural predictors; propagate evidence and analogies across entities via similarity matrices.
- Tools/workflow: Joint training of embeddings and rules; hypothesis ranking by TL inference; lab-in-the-loop validation.
- Dependencies/assumptions: High-quality structured data; scalable training; IP and data-sharing frameworks.
- GPU-accelerated Datalog/SQL engines via tensorization
- Sector: databases, data warehousing
- What: Native join/projection kernels on GPUs framed as tensor ops; cost-based planners aware of dense/sparse boundaries and Tucker options.
- Tools/workflow: Operator libraries; vectorized rule execution plans; integration with lakehouse systems.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Interchange formats; reliable kernel performance across skewed data.
- Program synthesis and code reasoning
- Sector: software engineering
- What: Represent program semantics/specs as TL rules; check conformance; search for implementations guided by analogical reasoning over embeddings of code fragments.
- Tools/workflow: Embeddings of ASTs/specs; constraint solving via backward chaining; hybrid with LLM code generation.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Rich code corpora embeddings; scalable search; correctness validation.
- Energy grid and operations optimization with hybrid models
- Sector: energy, supply chain
- What: Combine operational rules with probabilistic forecasts and neural demand models; perform inference/planning under uncertainty.
- Tools/workflow: Graphical models for uncertainty; TL-based constraint application; scenario sampling.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Real-time data; integration with SCADA/OT; robust approximate inference.
- Hardware acceleration specialized for tensor logic
- Sector: semiconductors, AI infrastructure
- What: Architectures optimized for join/projection patterns, einsum scheduling, and sparse–dense fusion with on-chip thresholding/normalization.
- Tools/workflow: Compiler co-design; kernel libraries for TL primitives; benchmarking suites.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Market adoption; standardization of TL ops.
- Standardized benchmarks for explainable reasoning at scale
- Sector: academia, policy
- What: Datasets and metrics for soundness (T=0), controllable analogy (T>0), transparency (extractability of intermediate tensors), and error vs. embedding dimension.
- Tools/workflow: Open-source TL reference implementations; leaderboards; ablation suites.
- Dependencies/assumptions: Community participation; clear evaluation protocols.
Cross-cutting assumptions and dependencies
- A performant TL runtime or DSL layer is pivotal; near-term implementations can piggyback on PyTorch/JAX/NumPy einsum and Datalog engines.
- Managing approximate errors in embedding-space reasoning requires sufficient embedding dimensions, optional thresholding/re-embedding, and temperature control.
- Scaling pathways: (1) separation of concerns (DB engine for sparse, GPU for dense), and (2) Tucker-based dense conversion on GPUs; both need robust engineering.
- Rule quality and governance are critical in regulated domains; T=0 rules should encode hard constraints to guarantee soundness.
- Developer tooling (IDEs, debuggers, visualizers, linters for index alignment) will drive adoption and correctness.
Glossary
- Aggregated features: The result of combining the features of neighboring nodes in a graph via a neural network mechanism, often used in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to gather local structural information. Example: "The GNN then aggregates each node's neighbors' new features by joining the tensors and ."
- Attention: A mechanism in neural networks, particularly transformers, that allows models to focus on different parts of the input sequence dynamically by computing a weighted sum to capture dependencies irrespective of their distance in the sequence. Example: "Attention is implemented as described above, with two additional indices for each tensor: for the attention block and for the attention head."
- Bayesian network: A graphical model that represents probabilistic relationships among variables using directed acyclic graphs, enabling the computation of joint or conditional probabilities. Example: "A Bayesian network can thus be encoded in tensor logic using one equation per variable, stating the variable's distribution in terms of its conditional probability table (CPT) and the parents' distributions."
- Belief propagation: An inference algorithm for probabilistic graphical models that computes marginal distributions efficiently by passing messages between nodes in a graph. Example: "Loopy belief propagation is forward chaining on the tensor logic program representing the model."
- Convolutional neural network (CNN): A class of deep neural networks primarily used in computer vision scenarios, characterized by convolutional layers that apply filters to input data to detect patterns. Example: "A convolutional neural network is an MLP with convolutional and pooling layers."
- Embedding: A dense vector representation of discrete variables (like words or nodes), often used to capture semantic information in a continuous vector space. Example: "The text's embedding is then obtained by multiplying by the embedding matrix ."
- Einstein notation (Einstein summation convention): A simplified way to write summation operations in tensor algebra that omits summation symbols, implicitly indicating summation over repeated indices. Example: "Einstein notation simplifies tensor equations by omitting all summation signs and implicitly summing over all repeated indices."
- Forward chaining: An inference strategy that starts with known facts, applies inference rules to these facts, and derives new facts until a specific goal is reached or no new information can be derived. Example: "In forward chaining, the rules are repeatedly applied to the known facts to derive new facts until no further ones can be derived."
- Inductive logic programming (ILP): A subfield of machine learning which focuses on learning human-readable logic programs from examples and background knowledge. Example: "The field of inductive logic programming (ILP) is concerned with learning logic programs from data."
- Kernel machines: A class of algorithms for pattern analysis, whose best-known members are support vector machines (SVMs), that use kernel functions to operate in a high-dimensional space without explicitly calculating the coordinates of the data in that space. Example: "A kernel machine can be implemented by the equation ."
- Logic programming: A type of programming paradigm which is largely based upon formal logic, often used for symbolic AI, with Datalog and Prolog being prominent examples. Example: "The most widely used formalism in symbolic AI is logic programming."
- Matrix factorization (Tucker decomposition): A form of decomposition of tensors that breaks them down into a core tensor and a matrix along each mode, used for dimensionality reduction and tensor compression. Example: "In particular, the {\em Tucker decomposition} decomposes a tensor into a more compact {\em core tensor} of the same rank and {\em factor matrices}, each expanding an index of the core tensor into an index of the original one."
- Tucker decomposition: A form of tensor decomposition that decomposes a tensor into a core tensor and a set of matrices that capture relationships along each mode, used for data compression and representation. Example: "Like matrices, tensors can be decomposed into products of smaller tensors. In particular, the {\em Tucker decomposition} decomposes a tensor into a more compact {\em core tensor} of the same rank and {\em factor matrices}, each expanding an index of the core tensor into an index of the original one."
- Unification: A process in logic and computer science used to determine how terms can be made identical by finding substitutions, crucial for automated reasoning in languages like Prolog. Example: "Accommodating functions (as in Prolog) requires implementing unification in tensor logic."
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.