Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Galactic chemical evolution of short-lived radioactive isotopes produced by explosive nucleosynthesis: 60^{60}Fe and 53^{53}Mn

Published 25 Sep 2025 in astro-ph.SR and astro-ph.HE | (2509.20956v1)

Abstract: Several short-lived radionuclides (SLRs) are know to have existed in the early Solar System (ESS). These species, which typically decay with half-lives of the order of a few million years, can be used to probe the timescale of events preceding the birth of the Sun. We investigate the ESS origin of <sup>53<sup>{53}Mn, produced by core-collapse (CCSNe) and Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), and <sup>60<sup>{60}Fe, produced exclusively by CCSNe. We model the evolution of the radioactive-to-stable abundance ratios of these SLRs with a galactic chemical evolution (GCE) framework accounting for different supernova yields, SN Ia delay times, and other galactic features (K)(K). A further set of models are calculated assuming that SN Ia did not contribute any <sup>53<sup>{53}Mn to the ESS. The predicted ratios are compared to meteoritic ratios to derive a distribution of solar isolation times that includes uncertainties due to stochastic chemical enrichment and precision of the ESS values. The isolation times are then compared to those of <sup>107<sup>{107}Pd and <sup>182<sup>{182}Hf calculated in previous work. A self-consistent solution can be found within the current uncertainties, especially when using the GCE setups with K=1.6K = 1.6 and 2.3, although the maximum likelihood for the \iso{60}Fe distribution is typically ∼4−5\sim 4-5 Myr shorter than for \iso{53}Mn. The predicted \iso{60}Fe/\iso{53}Mn ratio, instead, is completely inconsistent with the ESS value; this could be resolved using a larger fraction of faint CCSNe than usually considered in GCE models.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.