Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quadratic Kernel for Cliques or Trees Vertex Deletion

Published 20 Sep 2025 in cs.DS | (2509.16815v1)

Abstract: We consider \textsc{Cliques or Trees Vertex Deletion}, which is a hybrid of two fundamental parameterized problems: \textsc{Cluster Vertex Deletion} and \textsc{Feedback Vertex Set}. In this problem, we are given an undirected graph GG and an integer kk, and asked to find a vertex subset XX of size at most kk such that each connected component of G−XG-X is either a clique or a tree. Jacob et al. (ISAAC, 2024) provided a kernel of O(k<sup>5)O(k<sup>5) vertices for this problem, which was recently improved to O(k<sup>4)O(k<sup>4) by Tsur (IPL, 2025). Our main result is a kernel of O(k<sup>2)O(k<sup>2) vertices. This result closes the gap between the kernelization result for \textsc{Feedback Vertex Set}, which corresponds to the case where each connected component of G−XG-X must be a tree. Although both \emph{cluster vertex deletion number} and \emph{feedback vertex set number} are well-studied structural parameters, little attention has been given to parameters that generalize both of them. In fact, the lowest common well-known generalization of them is clique-width, which is a highly general parameter. To fill the gap here, we initiate the study of the \emph{cliques or trees vertex deletion number} as a structural parameter. We prove that \textsc{Longest Cycle}, which is a fundamental problem that does not admit o(n<sup>k)o(n<sup>k)-time algorithm unless ETH fails when kk is the clique-width, becomes fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the cliques or trees vertex deletion number.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.