Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Through the fog: a complementary optical galaxy classification scheme for 'intermediate' redshifts

Published 23 Jul 2025 in astro-ph.GA | (2507.17529v1)

Abstract: Understanding galaxy classification depends on our interpretation of their spectra. To date, the hydrogen Balmer lines remain the most consistent way to classify galaxies, but at 'intermediate' redshifts ($1.5 < z < 2.5$), galaxies are hard to parse in the BPT diagram (and its siblings) because the crucial H$\alpha$ emission line is out of range of ground-based optical spectographs. In this work, we re-explore a known diagram, which we call the OB-I diagram, that compares the equivalent width of H$\beta$ with the emission line ratio of [OIII]$\lambda$5007/H$\beta$, and breathe new life into it, as it has the potential to 'illuminate the fog' that permeates galaxy classification in the restframe optical spectra. Using data from SDSS, LEGA-C, VANDELS, JADES, 3D-HST and MOSDEF, we explore galaxy classification in the OB-I diagram at a wide range of redshifts ($0 < z < 2.7$). We find that, at $z < 0.4$, the OB-I diagram clearly separates galaxies between two distinct types, which we divide with an empirical fit: one dominated by AGN and a second made up of a mixed population of SF galaxies and AGN activity. This mixed population can be partially separated from a pure SF population, with a simple semi-empirical fit derived from a comparison with theoretical models and the BPT diagrams. At higher redshifts, we find that the majority of AGNs identified by other classification schemes are correctly recovered by the OB-I diagram, potentially making this diagram resistant to the 'cosmic shift' that plagues most optical classification schemes. Overall, the OB-I diagram, which only requires two emission lines to be implemented, is a useful tool at separating galaxies that possess a dominating AGN component in their emission from others, from the Local Universe ($z < 0.1$) to the Cosmic Noon ($z \sim 2$), without any need for significant adjustments in our empirical fit.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.