Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 58 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

KMT-2022-BLG-0086: Another binary-lens binary-source microlensing event (2506.20914v1)

Published 26 Jun 2025 in astro-ph.SR, astro-ph.EP, and astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We present the analysis of a microlensing event KMT-2022-BLG-0086 of which the overall light curve is not described by a binary-lens single-source (2L1S) model, which suggests the existence of an extra lens or an extra source. We found that the event is best explained by the binary-lens binary-source (2L2S) model, but the 2L2S model is only favored over the triple-lens single-source (3L1S) model by $\Delta\chi{2} \simeq 9$. Although the event has noticeable anomalies around the peak of the light curve, they are not enough covered to constrain the angular Einstein radius $\theta_{\rm E}$, thus we only measure the minimum angular Einstein radius $\theta_{\rm E,min}$. From the Bayesian analysis, it is found that that the binary lens system is a binary star with masses of $(m_1,m_2)=(0.46{+0.35}_{-0.25}\, M_\odot, 0.75{+0.67}_{-0.55}\, M_\odot)$ at a distance of $D_{\rm L}=5.87{+1.21}_{-1.79}$ kpc, while the triple lens system is a brown dwarf or a massive giant planet in a low-mass binary-star system with masses of $(m_1,m_2,m_3)=(0.43{+0.41}_{-0.35}\, M_\odot, 0.056{+0.055}_{-0.047}\, M_\odot, 20.84{+20.20}_{-17.04}\, M_{\rm J})$ at a distance of $D_{\rm L}=4.06{+1.39}_{-3.28}$ kpc, indicating a disk lens system. The 2L2S model yields the relative lens-source proper motion of $\mu_{\rm rel} \geqslant 4.6\, \rm mas\, yr{-1}$ that is consistent with the Bayesian result, whereas the 3L1S model yields $\mu_{\rm rel} \geqslant 18.9\, \rm mas\, yr{-1}$, which is more than three times larger than that of a typical disk object of $\sim 6\, \rm mas\, yr{-1}$ and thus is not consistent with the Bayesian result. This suggests that the event is likely caused by the binary-lens binary-source model.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com