Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Low Rank Matrix Rigidity: Tight Lower Bounds and Hardness Amplification (2502.19580v1)

Published 26 Feb 2025 in cs.CC

Abstract: For an $N \times N$ matrix $A$, its rank-$r$ rigidity, denoted $\mathcal{R}A(r)$, is the minimum number of entries of $A$ that one must change to make its rank become at most $r$. Determining the rigidity of interesting explicit families of matrices remains a major open problem, and is central to understanding the complexities of these matrices in many different models of computation and communication. We focus in this paper on the Walsh-Hadamard transform and on the distance matrix', whose rows and columns correspond to binary vectors, and whose entries calculate whether the row and column are close in Hamming distance. Our results also generalize to other Kronecker powers andMajority powers' of fixed matrices. We prove two new results about such matrices. First, we prove new rigidity lower bounds in the low-rank regime where $r < \log N$. For instance, we prove that over any finite field, there are constants $c_1, c_2 > 0$ such that the $N \times N$ Walsh-Hadamard matrix $H_n$ satisfies $$\mathcal{R}{H_n}(c_1 \log N) \geq N2 \left( \frac12 - N{-c_2} \right),$$ and a similar lower bound for the other aforementioned matrices. This is tight, and is the new best rigidity lower bound for an explicit matrix family at this rank; the previous best was $\mathcal{R}(c_1 \log N) \geq c_3 N2$ for a small constant $c_3>0$. Second, we give new hardness amplification results, showing that rigidity lower bounds for these matrices for slightly higher rank would imply breakthrough rigidity lower bounds for much higher rank. For instance, if one could prove $$\mathcal{R}_{H_n}(\log{1 + \varepsilon} N) \geq N2 \left( \frac12 - N{-1/2{(\log \log N){o(1)}}} \right)$$ over any finite field for some $\varepsilon>0$, this would imply that $H_n$ is Razborov rigid, giving a breakthrough lower bound in communication complexity.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.