Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 99 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 161 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review (2501.12557v1)

Published 22 Jan 2025 in cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.CY

Abstract: LLMs have been positioned to revolutionize HCI, by reshaping not only the interfaces, design patterns, and sociotechnical systems that we study, but also the research practices we use. To-date, however, there has been little understanding of LLMs' uptake in HCI. We address this gap via a systematic literature review of 153 CHI papers from 2020-24 that engage with LLMs. We taxonomize: (1) domains where LLMs are applied; (2) roles of LLMs in HCI projects; (3) contribution types; and (4) acknowledged limitations and risks. We find LLM work in 10 diverse domains, primarily via empirical and artifact contributions. Authors use LLMs in five distinct roles, including as research tools or simulated users. Still, authors often raise validity and reproducibility concerns, and overwhelmingly study closed models. We outline opportunities to improve HCI research with and on LLMs, and provide guiding questions for researchers to consider the validity and appropriateness of LLM-related work.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper identifies five distinct roles for LLMs in HCI research, including acting as system engines, research tools, participants, study objects, and objects of user perception.
  • The paper reveals a significant rise in LLM-related studies from 2020 to 2024 across domains such as communication, education, and augmented task performance.
  • The paper highlights key challenges like performance biases, resource constraints, and validity issues, urging the development of robust methodological and ethical standards.

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review

Introduction

The growing integration of LLMs within the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) domain marks a significant shift in the landscape of computational research and practice. This paper conducts a systematic literature review to analyze the adoption and influence of LLMs at the CHI conference from 2020 to 2024. The paper aims to taxonomize LLM applications across various HCI domains, identify the roles LLMs play in research practices, and address associated challenges such as validity concerns and ethical implications.

Growth and Application Domains

The paper reveals a substantial rise in LLM-related research across diverse HCI subfields. Notable domains of application include:

  • Communication and Writing: LLMs are prevalent in tasks ranging from creative writing and storytelling to AI-mediated communication, serving primarily as tools for generating or augmenting textual output.
  • Education: From assisting in language learning to supporting educators with AI-generated teaching materials, LLMs are reshaping educational paradigms.
  • Augmenting Capabilities: LLMs enhance human performance in various settings like productivity applications and real-time interactions in mixed reality environments. Figure 1

    Figure 1: The raw number of LLM-related papers, followed by the percentage of the total number of papers in each year 2020-2024.

Roles of LLMs in Research

The research outlines five distinct roles of LLMs in HCI projects:

  • LLMs as System Engines: Serving as core components within both simple and complex systems to generate content or process information efficiently.
  • LLMs as Research Tools: Facilitating research tasks such as data analysis and synthesis, supporting an emerging methodology within HCI.
  • LLMs as Participants or Users: Simulating human interactions or perceptions, revealing the potential and limitations of using LLMs as stand-ins for human participants.
  • LLMs as Objects of Study: Focusing on evaluating the internal mechanisms and performance of LLMs across contexts.
  • Users' Perceptions of LLMs: Examining user interactions and perceptions, contributing to the understanding of LLM integration into everyday technology use.

These roles demonstrate the versatility and expanding influence of LLMs within HCI research, providing a framework for future explorations and applications. Figure 2

Figure 2: A flow diagram on our sample selection and refinement process.

Contribution Types and Limitations

While empirical and artifact contributions are prevalent, there is a notable lack of theoretical and methodological advancements. This highlights an opportunity for developing new frameworks and methods tailored to LLM-powered systems. Additionally, the paper emphasizes several limitations:

  • Performance Issues: Concerns about LLM biases, data coverage, and the nondeterministic nature of outputs present challenges for consistent application.
  • Resource Constraints: Computational and financial costs, coupled with a lack of standardized evaluation metrics, present barriers to LLM deployment and reproducibility.
  • Validity Concerns: Questions around the internal and external validity of LLM-powered studies point to the need for robust methodological frameworks and transparent disclosure practices.

Consequences and Future Directions

The review underscores the necessity for considering the broader consequences of LLM applications, including ethical implications related to AI biases and economic impacts. The research community is urged to develop standards and guidelines to address these challenges and to foster responsible innovation within the field.

Moreover, the paper proposes guiding questions for researchers to evaluate the appropriateness of LLM usage in HCI projects, addressing validity, reproducibility, and broader societal consequences. These contemplative questions aim to direct future research toward more rigorous and ethically sound practices.

Conclusion

The integration of LLMs into HCI reflects a dynamic evolution of the field, with potential to significantly enhance research methodologies and application outcomes. This paper lays a foundation for further exploration and standardization, calling for a conscientious approach to leveraging LLM capabilities while navigating the complexities they introduce. Continued dialogue and collaboration across disciplines, paired with ethical vigilance, will be crucial in realizing the transformative potential of LLMs in HCI research.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube