Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 154 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 110 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Diving into Self-Evolving Training for Multimodal Reasoning (2412.17451v3)

Published 23 Dec 2024 in cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Self-evolving trainin--where models iteratively learn from their own outputs--has emerged as a key approach for complex reasoning tasks, addressing the scarcity of high-quality chain-of-thought data. However, its effectiveness in multimodal reasoning, a domain more intricate than text-only reasoning, remains underexplored, and the understanding of critical factors in this training paradigm remains limited. Furthermore, a central challenge for this training method is performance saturation, which impedes further improvements and scalability. Inspired by reinforcement learning (RL), in this paper, we reframe self-evolving training for multimodal reasoning through the lens of RL, identifying three pivotal factors: Training Method, Reward Model, and Prompt Variation. Through systematic analysis, we establish relatively optimal design principles that significantly enhance multimodal reasoning capabilities. Moreover, delving deeper into training dynamics, we uncover the roots of saturation and propose a new automatic balancing mechanism to mitigate this limitation. Building on these insights, we propose M-STAR (Multimodal Self-evolving Training for Reasoning), a framework that achieves consistent performance gains across models of varying sizes and diverse benchmarks. All resources are made publicly available at https://mstar-lmm.github.io.

Summary

  • The paper proposes M-STaR, a framework exploring self-evolving training strategies to enhance Large Multimodal Model reasoning capabilities.
  • Continuous self-evolving training significantly improves performance, raising MathVista accuracy from 52.8% to 59.5% compared to iterative methods.
  • A novel Process Reward Model (PRM) acts as an effective reranker, providing rich reward signals beyond binary measures for improved multimodal reasoning.

An Expert Evaluation of "Diving into Self-Evolving Training for Multimodal Reasoning"

The paper "Diving into Self-Evolving Training for Multimodal Reasoning" presents an insightful exploration of self-evolving training mechanisms aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). While LMMs showcase significant promise across various domains, from robotics to autonomous systems, their reasoning proficiency in multimodal settings remains suboptimal, primarily due to the limited availability of annotated multimodal data. The authors propose M-STaR (Multimodal Self-evolving Training for Reasoning), a framework that exquisitely synthesizes insights from systematic experiments on diverse training strategies.

Core Investigations

The research articulates three pivotal dimensions influencing the efficacy of self-evolving training in multimodal reasoning: training methods, reward models, and prompt variation. By examining these factors extensively, the authors deduce best practices that optimize the training framework.

  1. Training Methods: Continuous self-evolving approaches demonstrate superior performance compared to traditional iterative methods. By retaining the optimizer and learning rate scheduler states, continuous self-evolving training mitigates the discrepancies typical in iterative restarts. This method achieved notable improvements, particularly on the MathVista benchmark, with test accuracy rising from 52.8% to 59.5% under optimal parameters.
  2. Reward Models: The paper introduces a Process Reward Model (PRM), a novel advancement in multimodal reasoning that enriches reward signals beyond binary measures. The PRM is particularly effective as a reranker, discerning high-quality correct responses over noisy counterparts. Implementing this model resulted in a substantial performance boost, underlining the significance of detailed process validation in complex reasoning scenarios.
  3. Prompt Variation: Although their exploration with unlabeled prompts revealed mixed results, it sheds light on the potential of oracle signals and pseudo-labeling in expanding the training dataset breadth. The authors note that high variability in prompts can introduce noise and negatively impact model stability if not managed with precision.

Implications and Future Directions

The results from this paper provide a robust framework for future research, advocating for a harmonized blend of continuous optimization, refined reward models, and controlled prompt variation. The M-STaR framework exemplifies the potential of self-evolving training when executed with dynamically-tuned strategies, such as the integration of Reward-Pass metrics to finetune exploration and exploitation recursively during training.

Practically, the research introduces a scalable approach to enhancing multimodal AI systems in environments where human annotations are sparse or impractical. Theoretically, it emphasizes the relevance of fine-grained control over training processes and model introspection to maximize task adaptability and solve increasingly complex reasoning problems.

Speculation on AI Evolution

Going forward, the integration of dynamic adaptive components, such as reward models that learn through exposure to diverse inputs, could further refines self-evolving systems. Additionally, as models scale larger, real-time adjustments reacting to ongoing training dynamics might be pivotal in maintaining performance gains across diverse reasoning benchmarks. Future research could substantially benefit from exploring tighter couplings of multimodal datasets and reinforcement learning paradigms, driving a new frontier in model-induced generalization and problem-solving capabilities.

In summary, the paper offers comprehensive insights that substantially enrich the existing literature on multimodal reasoning training methodologies. Its findings serve as a cornerstone for subsequent experimental advancements in enhancing the reasoning prowess of multimodal AI systems.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Questions

We haven't generated a list of open questions mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 6 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: