Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

New Modes for Vector Bosons in the Static Patch

Published 19 Dec 2024 in hep-th and gr-qc | (2412.14749v1)

Abstract: We consider a massive vector Boson in a static patch of DD-dimensional de Sitter space (dS<em>D<em>D). We argue that this field is controlled by an effective physical (squared) mass μ</em>v<sup>2</sup>=mv<sup>2</sup>+2(D−1)ℓdS<sup>−2\mu</em>{\mathrm{v}}<sup>2</sup> = m_{\mathrm{v}}<sup>2</sup> + 2(D-1)\ell_{\mathrm{dS}}<sup>{-2} which differs from the naive "Lagrangian" (squared) mass mv<sup>2m_{\mathrm{v}}<sup>2 that appears in the usual form of the Proca Lagrangian/action. In particular, we conjecture that the theory remains well-defined in the naively tachyonic Lagrangian mass range $-2(D-1) &lt; m_{\mathrm{v}}<sup>2\ell_{\mathrm{dS}}<sup>2</sup></sup> &lt; 0$. We identify several interesting physical features of the "edge of stability" mv<sup>2ℓdS<sup>2</sup></sup>=−2(D−1)m_{\mathrm{v}}<sup>2\ell_{\mathrm{dS}}<sup>2</sup></sup> = -2(D-1). Fixing a static patch breaks the DD-dimensional de Sitter isometries down to a "static patch subgroup", which explains why our theory may continue to be well-defined in the above mass range despite not fitting into a unitary irreducible representation of SO(D,1)(D,1). We conjecture that for situations such as ours, the usual SO(D,1)\mathrm{SO}(D,1) "Higuchi bound" on unitarity is replaced by the concept of the edge of stability. In D=3D = 3 spacetime dimensions, the ss-wave sector of our theory remarkably simplifies, becoming equivalent to the pp-wave sector of an ordinary massive scalar. In this case we can explicitly check that the D=3D = 3 ss-wave sector remains well-defined -- both classically and quantum mechanically -- in the above mass range. In the course of our analysis, we will derive the general classical solution and the quasinormal frequency spectrum for the massive vector Boson in the static patch of dSD_D, generalizing previous work by Higuchi [1], which was done for the special case D=4D = 4. While this work was being completed, we became aware of upcoming work by Grewal, Law, and Lochab [2] which will contain a similar derivation.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.