Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Combining graph deep learning and London dispersion interatomic potentials: A case study on pnictogen chalcohalides

Published 2 Nov 2024 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci and physics.comp-ph | (2411.01197v1)

Abstract: Machine-learning interatomic potential models based on graph neural network architectures have the potential to make atomistic materials modeling widely accessible due to their computational efficiency, scalability, and broad applicability. The training datasets for many such models are derived from density-functional theory calculations, typically using a semilocal exchange-correlation functional. As a result, long-range interactions such as London dispersion are often missing in these models. We investigate whether this missing component can be addressed by combining a graph deep learning potential with semiempirical dispersion models. We assess this combination by deriving the equations of state for layered pnictogen chalcohalides BiTeBr and BiTeI and performing crystal structure optimizations for a broader set of V-VI-VII compounds with various stoichiometries, many of which possess van der Waals gaps. We characterize the optimized crystal structures by calculating their X-ray diffraction patterns and radial distribution function histograms, which are also used to compute Earth mover's distances to quantify the dissimilarity between the optimized and corresponding experimental structures. We find that dispersion-corrected graph deep learning potentials generally (though not universally) provide a more realistic description of these compounds due to the inclusion of van der Waals attractions. In particular, their use results in systematic improvements in predicting not only the van der Waals gap but also the layer thickness in layered V-VI-VII compounds. Our results demonstrate that the combined potentials studied here, derived from a straightforward approach that neither requires fine-tuning the training nor refitting the potential parameters, can significantly improve the description of layered polar crystals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Schütt, A. Tkatchenko,  and K.-R. Müller, “Machine learning force fields,” Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).
  2. C. Chen and S. P. Ong, “A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table,” Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 718–728 (2022).
  3. S. Takamoto, C. Shinagawa, D. Motoki, K. Nakago, W. Li, I. Kurata, T. Watanabe, Y. Yayama, H. Iriguchi, Y. Asano, et al., “Towards universal neural network potential for material discovery applicable to arbitrary combination of 45 elements,” Nat. Commun. 13, 2991 (2022).
  4. K. Choudhary, B. DeCost, L. Major, K. Butler, J. Thiyagalingam,  and F. Tavazza, “Unified graph neural network force-field for the periodic table: solid state applications,” Digital Discovery 2, 346–355 (2023).
  5. B. Deng, P. Zhong, K. Jun, J. Riebesell, K. Han, C. J. Bartel,  and G. Ceder, “CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling,” Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).
  6. A. Merchant, S. Batzner, S. S. Schoenholz, M. Aykol, G. Cheon,  and E. D. Cubuk, “Scaling deep learning for materials discovery,” Nature 624, 80–85 (2023).
  7. I. Batatia, P. Benner, Y. Chiang, A. M. Elena, D. P. Kovács, J. Riebesell, X. R. Advincula, M. Asta, W. J. Baldwin, N. Bernstein, et al., “A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00096  (2023).
  8. H. Yang, C. Hu, Y. Zhou, X. Liu, Y. Shi, J. Li, G. Li, Z. Chen, S. Chen, C. Zeni, et al., “Mattersim: A deep learning atomistic model across elements, temperatures and pressures,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04967  (2024).
  9. C. A. Becker, F. Tavazza, Z. T. Trautt,  and R. A. B. de Macedo, “Considerations for choosing and using force fields and interatomic potentials in materials science and engineering,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 17, 277–283 (2013).
  10. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke,  and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  11. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich,  and H. Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu,” J. Chem. Phys. 132 (2010).
  12. S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich,  and L. Goerigk, “Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory,” J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).
  13. S. Güler-Kılıç and Ç. Kılıç, “Crystal and electronic structure of BiTeI, AuTeI, and PdTeI compounds: A dispersion-corrected density-functional study,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 245204 (2015).
  14. E. Caldeweyher, J.-M. Mewes, S. Ehlert,  and S. Grimme, “Extension and evaluation of the D4 London-dispersion model for periodic systems,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 8499–8512 (2020).
  15. S. Güler-Kılıç and Ç. Kılıç, “Pressure dependence of the band-gap energy in BiTeI,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 165203 (2016).
  16. J. Sans, F. Manjón, A. Pereira, R. Vilaplana, O. Gomis, A. Segura, A. Muñoz, P. Rodríguez-Hernández, C. Popescu, C. Drasar, et al., “Structural, vibrational, and electrical study of compressed BiTeBr,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 024110 (2016).
  17. J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou,  and K. Burke, “Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).
  18. S. Gražulis, D. Chateigner, R. T. Downs, A. Yokochi, M. Quirós, L. Lutterotti, E. Manakova, J. Butkus, P. Moeck,  and A. Le Bail, “Crystallography Open Database–an open-access collection of crystal structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 726–729 (2009), web page: http://www.crystallography.net.
  19. Y. Iwasaki, A. G. Kusne,  and I. Takeuchi, “Comparison of dissimilarity measures for cluster analysis of X-ray diffraction data from combinatorial libraries,” Npj Comput. Mater. 3, 1–9 (2017).
  20. E. Wlaźlak, A. Blachecki, M. Bisztyga-Szklarz, S. Klejna, T. Mazur, K. Mech, K. Pilarczyk, D. Przyczyna, M. Suchecki, P. Zawal, et al., “Heavy pnictogen chalcohalides: the synthesis, structure and properties of these rediscovered semiconductors,” Chem. Commun. 54, 12133–12162 (2018).
  21. U. V. Ghorpade, M. P. Suryawanshi, M. A. Green, T. Wu, X. Hao,  and K. M. Ryan, “Emerging chalcohalide materials for energy applications,” Chem. Rev. 123, 327–378 (2022).
  22. Y. C. Choi and R. Nie, “Heavy pnictogen chalcohalides for efficient, stable, and environmentally friendly solar cell applications,” Nanotechnology 34, 142001 (2023).
  23. J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler,  and A. Michaelides, “Van der waals density functionals applied to solids,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 195131 (2011).
  24. X. Xi, C. Ma, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, W. Ku, H. Berger, C. Martin, D. Tanner,  and G. Carr, “Signatures of a pressure-induced topological quantum phase transition in BiTeI,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 155701 (2013).
  25. A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Dułak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus, et al., “The atomic simulation environment–a Python library for working with atoms,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017), web page: https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/ase.
  26. https://github.com/materialsvirtuallab/matgl (a).
  27. https://github.com/dftd3/simple-dftd3 (a).
  28. https://github.com/dftd4/dftd4 (b).
  29. https://matterverse.ai (b).
  30. A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, et al., “Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation,” APL Mater. 1 (2013).
  31. S. R. Hall, F. H. Allen,  and I. D. Brown, “The crystallographic information file (CIF): a new standard archive file for crystallography,” Acta Cryst. 47, 655–685 (1991).
  32. E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. Gähler, M. Moseler,  and P. Gumbsch, “Structural relaxation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170201 (2006).
  33. J. Nocedal, “Updating quasi-newton matrices with limited storage,” Math. Comput. 35, 773–782 (1980).
  34. S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson,  and G. Ceder, “Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source Python library for materials analysis,” Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013), web page: https://pymatgen.org.
  35. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, et al., “SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python,” Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
  36. J. Hester, “A validating CIF parser: PyCIFRW,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 621–625 (2006).
  37. A. Ohmura, Y. Higuchi, T. Ochiai, M. Kanou, F. Ishikawa, S. Nakano, A. Nakayama, Y. Yamada,  and T. Sasagawa, “Pressure-induced topological phase transition in the polar semiconductor BiTeBr,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 125203 (2017).
  38. S. Grimme, “Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction,” J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).
  39. I. P. Rusinov, T. V. Menshchikova, I. Y. Sklyadneva, R. Heid, K.-P. Bohnen,  and E. V. Chulkov, “Pressure effects on crystal and electronic structure of bismuth tellurohalides,” New J. Phys. 18, 113003 (2016).
  40. B. Monserrat and D. Vanderbilt, “Temperature dependence of the bulk Rashba splitting in the bismuth tellurohalides,” Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 054201 (2017).
  41. V. Brousseau-Couture, G. Antonius,  and M. Côté, “Temperature dependence of the topological phase transition of BiTeI from first principles,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023185 (2020).
  42. A. Shevelkov, E. Dikarev, R. Shpanchenko,  and B. Popovkin, “Crystal structures of bismuth tellurohalides BiTeX (X= Cl, Br, I) from X-ray powder diffraction data,” J. Solid State Chem. 114, 379–384 (1995).
  43. K. Momma and F. Izumi, “VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.