Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum tree generator improves QAOA state-of-the-art for the knapsack problem

Published 1 Nov 2024 in quant-ph | (2411.00518v1)

Abstract: This paper introduces a novel approach to the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), specifically tailored to the knapsack problem. We combine the recently proposed quantum tree generator as an efficient state preparation circuit for all feasible solutions to the knapsack problem with the framework of Grover-mixer QAOA to form the first representative of Amplitude Amplification-mixer QAOA (AAM-QAOA). On hard benchmark sets with up to 20 knapsack items, we demonstrate our method's improved performance over the current state-of-the-art Copula-QAOA. However, for larger instance sizes, both approaches fail to deliver better outcomes than greedily packing items in descending value-to-weight ratio, at least for the considered circuit depths. For sufficiently high circuit depths, however, we can prove that AAM-QAOA will eventually be able to sample the optimal solution.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  2. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  3. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (2014), arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph] .
  4. A. Lucas, Front. Phys. 2, 5 (2014).
  5. P. D. de la Grand’rive and J.-F. Hullo, Knapsack Problem variants of QAOA for battery revenue optimisation (2019), arXiv:1908.02210 [quanth-ph] .
  6. C. Roch, A. Impertro, and C. Linnhoff-Popien, in International Conference on Computational Science (Springer, 2021) pp. 60–73.
  7. D. J. Egger, J. Mareček, and S. Woerner, Quantum 5, 479 (2021).
  8. J. Jooken, P. Leyman, and P. De Causmaecker, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 301, 841 (2022).
  9. A. Bärtschi and S. Eidenbenz, in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, 2020) pp. 72–82.
  10. D. Pisinger, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 87, 175 (1995).
  11. S. Martello, D. Pisinger, and P. Toth, Manage. Sci. 45, 414 (1999).
  12. IBM, IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio, https://www.ibm.com/products/ilog-cplex-optimization-studio (2022).
  13. Gurobi Optimization, LLC, Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual, https://www.gurobi.com (2023).
  14. Google OR-Tools, Google OR-Tools Documentation, https://developers.google.com/optimization/cp (2024).
  15. N. J. Cerf, L. K. Grover, and C. P. Williams, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032303 (2000).
  16. A. Montanaro, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013056 (2020).
  17. C. Durr and P. Høyer, A Quantum Algorithm for Finding the Minimum (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9607014 .
  18. L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9605043 .
  19. R. M. Karp, Reducibility among Combinatorial Problems (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1972) pp. 85–103.
  20. S. G. Johnson, The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package, https://github.com/stevengj/nlopt (2007).
  21. M. Smelyanskiy, N. P. D. Sawaya, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, qHiPSTER: The Quantum High Performance Software Testing Environment (2016), arXiv:1601.07195 [quant-ph] .
  22. D. Pisinger, Comput. Oper. Res. 32, 2271 (2005).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.