Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Commit: Online Groups with Participation Commitments

Published 30 Oct 2024 in cs.HC | (2410.23267v1)

Abstract: In spite of efforts to increase participation, many online groups struggle to survive past the initial days, as members leave and activity atrophies. We argue that a main assumption of online group design -- that groups ask nothing of their members beyond lurking -- may be preventing many of these groups from sustaining a critical mass of participation. In this paper, we explore an alternative commitment design for online groups, which requires that all members commit at regular intervals to participating, as a condition of remaining in the group. We instantiate this approach in a mobile group chat platform called Commit, and perform a field study comparing commitment against a control condition of social psychological nudges with N=57 participants over three weeks. Commitment doubled the number of contributions versus the control condition, and resulted in 87% (vs. 19%) of participants remaining active by the third week. Participants reported that commitment provided safe cover for them to post even when they were nervous. Through this work, we argue that more effortful, not less effortful, membership may support many online groups.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (62)
  1. Mark S Ackerman. 2000. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human–Computer Interaction 15, 2-3 (2000), 179–203.
  2. Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior 55 (2016), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.009
  3. Lars Backstrom. 2016. Serving a Billion Personalized News Feeds. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (WSDM ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 469. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835848
  4. Nooks: Social Spaces to Lower Hesitations in Interacting with New People at Work. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.
  5. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 212–221.
  6. 4chan and /b/: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2011). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6382252
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77.
  8. Introductions and Questions: Rhetorical Strategies that Elicit Response in Online Communities. (1 2007). https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6470183.v1
  9. Feed Me: Motivating Newcomer Contribution in Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518847
  10. Brian S Butler. 2001. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information systems research 12, 4 (2001), 346–362.
  11. A. Chen. 2021. The Cold Start Problem: Using Network Effects to Scale Your Product. Random House. https://books.google.com/books?id=Nwb7DwAAQBAJ
  12. Justin Cheng and Michael Bernstein. 2014. Catalyst: Triggering Collective Action with Thresholds. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531635
  13. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 24. Elsevier, 201–234.
  14. Collective Narrative: Scaffolding Community Storytelling through Context-Awareness. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Virtual Event, USA) (CSCW ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481747
  15. SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. 32–41.
  16. Are All Successful Communities Alike? Characterizing and Predicting the Success of Online Communities. In The World Wide Web Conference (San Francisco, CA, USA) (WWW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313689
  17. Jonathan D. D’Angelo and Catalina L. Toma. 2017. There Are Plenty of Fish in the Sea: The Effects of Choice Overload and Reversibility on Online Daters’ Satisfaction With Selected Partners. Media Psychology 20, 1 (2017), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121827 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121827
  18. How online lurking contributes value to E-participation: A conceptual approach to evaluating the role of lurkers in e-participation. In 2017 Fourth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG). 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2017.7962517
  19. Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems That Support Social Processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (mar 2000), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345004
  20. Social Resilience in Online Communities: The Autopsy of Friendster. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Online Social Networks (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (COSN ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512938.2512946
  21. Saul Greenberg and Michael Rounding. 2001. The Notification Collage: Posting Information to Public and Personal Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365339
  22. Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (1994), 92–105.
  23. Sophie Haigney. 2024. How Group Chats Rule the World. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/16/magazine/group-chats.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare. Accessed: 2024-01-16.
  24. Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 13, 1 (Feb. 2019), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-1-4
  25. Sohyeon Hwang and Jeremy D. Foote. 2021. Why Do People Participate in Small Online Communities? Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 462 (oct 2021), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479606
  26. CommunityClick: Capturing and Reporting Community Feedback from Town Halls to Improve Inclusivity. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3, Article 213 (jan 2021), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432912
  27. Elisabeth Joyce and Robert E Kraut. 2006. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 3 (2006), 723–747.
  28. Steven J Karau and Kipling D Williams. 1993. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of personality and social psychology 65, 4 (1993), 681.
  29. Steven J Karau and Kipling D Williams. 2014. Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model. In Groups at work. Psychology Press, 127–156.
  30. Sarah Kate Merry and Anoush Simon. 2012. Living and lurking on LiveJournal: The benefits of active and non-active membership. In Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 64. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 241–261.
  31. Norbert L. Kerr and Guido Hertel. 2011. The Köhler Group Motivation Gain: How to Motivate the ‘Weak Links’ in a Group. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5, 1 (2011), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00333.x arXiv:https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00333.x
  32. Hyang-Sook Kim and S Shyam Sundar. 2011. Using interface cues in online health community boards to change impressions and encourage user contribution. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 599–608.
  33. Hyang-Sook Kim and S Shyam Sundar. 2014. Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior 37 (2014), 319–333.
  34. Ensemble: Exploring Complementary Strengths of Leaders and Crowds in Creative Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531638
  35. Encouraging forum participation in online courses with collectivist, individualist and neutral motivational framings. EMOOCS 2014, Proceedings of the European MOOC stakeholder summit (2014), 80–87.
  36. Bert Klandermans. 1984. Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansisons of resource mobilization theory. American sociological review (1984), 583–600.
  37. The challenges of dealing with newcomers. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design (2012), 179–230.
  38. Robert E. Kraut and Andrew T. Fiore. 2014. The Role of Founders in Building Online Groups. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531648
  39. Robert E Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2011. Encouraging contribution to online communities. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design (2011), 21–76.
  40. Socially situated artificial intelligence enables learning from human interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, 39 (2022), e2115730119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115730119 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2115730119
  41. Emily Kubin and Christian von Sikorski. 2021. The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association 45, 3 (2021), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
  42. Classroom Wikipedia participation effects on future intentions to contribute. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 403–406.
  43. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 2001. Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In Supporting lifelong learning. Routledge, 121–136.
  44. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 4 (2005), 00–00.
  45. Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 334, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445200
  46. Katie K. Martin and Adrian C. North. 2015. Diffusion of responsibility on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior 44 (2015), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.049
  47. No Such Thing as Too Much Chocolate: Evidence Against Choice Overload in E-Commerce. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4358–4369. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025778
  48. Encouraging online contributions in underrepresented populations. In 2015 Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2015.7296503
  49. Arvind Narayanan. 2023. Understanding Social Media Recommendation Algorithms. Knight First Amendment Institute (2023). https://knightcolumbia.org/content/understanding-social-media-recommendation-algorithms
  50. Blair Nonnecke and Jenny Preece. 2000. Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332409
  51. Jennifer Preece and Ben Shneiderman. 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS transactions on human-computer interaction 1, 1 (2009), 13–32.
  52. The Lifecycle and Cascade of WeChat Social Messaging Groups. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW ’16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2882979
  53. Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 6 (2008), 2757–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.001 Including the Special Issue: Electronic Games and Personalized eLearning Processes.
  54. Encouraging commitment in online communities. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design (2012), 77–124.
  55. Stack Exchange Inc. 2024. Area 51 Frequently Asked Questions. https://area51.stackexchange.com/faq
  56. Active lurking: Enhancing the value of in-house online communities through the related practices around the online communities. (2007).
  57. Planning and performance in small groups: Collective implementation intentions enhance group goal striving. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017), 603.
  58. u/TrueBirch. 2019. Let’s hear it for the lurkers! The vast majority of Reddit users don’t post or comment. [OC]. https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/b5f9wi/lets_hear_it_for_the_lurkers_the_vast_majority_of/
  59. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review 11, 1 (2017), 274–302.
  60. Join, Stay or Go? A Closer Look at Members’ Life Cycles in Online Health Communities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 171 (apr 2021), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449245
  61. Amy X Zhang and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Making sense of group chat through collaborative tagging and summarization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–27.
  62. Come-and-Go Patterns of Group Evolution: A Dynamic Model. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (KDD ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939795

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free