Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

VisualPredicator: Learning Abstract World Models with Neuro-Symbolic Predicates for Robot Planning (2410.23156v2)

Published 30 Oct 2024 in cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.LG, and cs.RO

Abstract: Broadly intelligent agents should form task-specific abstractions that selectively expose the essential elements of a task, while abstracting away the complexity of the raw sensorimotor space. In this work, we present Neuro-Symbolic Predicates, a first-order abstraction language that combines the strengths of symbolic and neural knowledge representations. We outline an online algorithm for inventing such predicates and learning abstract world models. We compare our approach to hierarchical reinforcement learning, vision-LLM planning, and symbolic predicate invention approaches, on both in- and out-of-distribution tasks across five simulated robotic domains. Results show that our approach offers better sample complexity, stronger out-of-distribution generalization, and improved interpretability.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01691, 2022.
  2. Recent advances in hierarchical reinforcement learning. Discrete event dynamic systems, 13:341–379, 2003.
  3. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818, 2023.
  4. Learning neuro-symbolic relational transition models for bilevel planning. In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp.  4166–4173. IEEE, 2022.
  5. Pybullet, a python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning, 2016.
  6. Long-horizon manipulation of unknown objects via task and motion planning with estimated affordances. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.  1940–1946. IEEE, 2022.
  7. Trust the proc3s: Solving long-horizon robotics problems with llms and constraint satisfaction, 2024a.
  8. Partially observable task and motion planning with uncertainty and risk awareness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10454, 2024b.
  9. Integrated task and motion planning. Annual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems, 4(1):265–293, 2021.
  10. Visual programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training. ArXiv, abs/2211.11559, 2022.
  11. Interpret: Interactive predicate learning from language feedback for generalizable task planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19758, 2024.
  12. Landmarks, critical paths and abstractions: what’s the difference anyway? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, volume 19, pp.  162–169, 2009.
  13. Look before you leap: Unveiling the power of gpt-4v in robotic vision-language planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17842, 2023.
  14. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05608, 2022.
  15. Learning portable representations for high-level planning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  4682–4691. PMLR, 2020.
  16. Autonomous learning of object-centric abstractions for high-level planning. In Proceedings of the The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  17. Llms can’t plan, but can help planning in llm-modulo frameworks, 2024.
  18. George Konidaris. On the necessity of abstraction. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 29:1–7, 2019.
  19. From skills to symbols: Learning symbolic representations for abstract high-level planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 61:215–289, 2018.
  20. Learning efficient abstract planning models that choose what to predict. In Conference on Robot Learning, pp.  2070–2095. PMLR, 2023a.
  21. Bilevel planning for robots: An illustrated introduction. 2023b. https://lis.csail.mit.edu/bilevel-planning-for-robots-an-illustrated-introduction.
  22. Practice makes perfect: Planning to learn skill parameter policies, 2024.
  23. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.  9493–9500. IEEE, 2023.
  24. Reinforcement learning with parameterized actions. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 30, 2016.
  25. Pddl-the planning domain definition language. 1998. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:59656859.
  26. Generative skill chaining: Long-horizon skill planning with diffusion models. In Conference on Robot Learning, pp.  2905–2925. PMLR, 2023.
  27. Augmenting reinforcement learning with behavior primitives for diverse manipulation tasks. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.  7477–7484. IEEE, 2022a.
  28. Augmenting reinforcement learning with behavior primitives for diverse manipulation tasks. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.  7477–7484. IEEE, 2022b.
  29. Learning symbolic models of stochastic domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 29:309–352, 2007.
  30. Learning symbolic operators for task and motion planning. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp.  3182–3189. IEEE, 2021.
  31. Learning neuro-symbolic skills for bilevel planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10680, 2022.
  32. Predicate invention for bilevel planning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pp.  12120–12129, 2023.
  33. Vipergpt: Visual inference via python execution for reasoning. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023.
  34. Between mdps and semi-mdps: A framework for temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning. Artificial intelligence, 112(1-2):181–211, 1999.
  35. Worldcoder, a model-based llm agent: Building world models by writing code and interacting with the environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12275, 2024.
  36. In defense of pddl axioms. Artificial Intelligence, 168(1-2):38–69, 2005.
  37. Set-of-mark prompting unleashes extraordinary visual grounding in gpt-4v. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11441, 2023.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a neuro-symbolic method that dynamically learns abstract world models, significantly enhancing sample efficiency and planning generalization.
  • It employs vision-language models to generate predicates that combine perceptual and logical insights, enabling robots to form high-level plans from visual inputs.
  • The system uses a closed-loop feedback mechanism to refine its predicates and high-level actions, improving robustness and interpretability in complex environments.

Neuro-Symbolic Abstraction for Robot Planning: Analyzing VisualPredicator

Neuro-symbolic systems are increasingly at the forefront of artificial intelligence research, combining the traditional logic-based approaches with the perceptual abilities facilitated by neural networks. This paper titled "VisualPredicator: Learning Abstract World Models with Neuro-Symbolic Predicates for Robot Planning" introduces a novel framework leveraging this concept for robotic planning tasks. It presents a method for efficiently learning abstract world models using Neuro-Symbolic Predicates (NSPs), which integrate symbolic representations with neural perception models.

Overview

The paper proposes NSPs as a first-order abstraction language, designed to enable robots to form perceptually and logically integrated representations of their environments. Unlike purely symbolic or purely neural approaches, NSPs allow for the synthesis of logical operations with perceptual queries, culminating in a robust structure for executing complex robotic tasks. The work distinguishes itself by integrating vision-LLMs (VLMs) within neuro-symbolic frameworks which improves the sample complexity, as evidenced by fewer required interactions for learning efficient task models.

Methodology

The approach commences by outlining an online algorithm that dynamically invents predicates and constructs high-level actions, facilitating the training of robots in diverse environments. The procedural core is constituted by three primary components:

  1. Predicate Learning: The system embarks on proposing predicates grounded both in distinct perceptual changes and robust logical assertions. NSPs are allowed to invoke VLMs to query perceptual properties. This sets it apart by capitalizing on neural approaches to infer visual characteristics such as object positioning and object identity within the perceptual flow.
  2. Hierarchical Planning: Planning involves formulating abstract high-level plans consisting of learned HLAs, which, when executed, break down into low-level skills. The symbolic task planner employed utilizes heuristics like A* search, tailored by the learned NSPs.
  3. Feedback and Adaptation: Integral to the system is a closed-loop mechanism that intersperses learned predicate validation and refinement based on execution outcomes. Upon detecting planning failures (infeasibility or non-satisficing plans), the system adapts by iterating on predicate proposal and refining the execution model.

Results and Implications

The experimentation spans across five meticulously simulated robotics domains, revealing that the proposed neuro-symbolic framework excels significantly in sample efficiency and task generalization compared to hierarchical reinforcement learning and other neural network planning techniques. In particular, the approach exhibits strong out-of-distribution generalization capabilities, indicative of its potential for real-world applications where environments and tasks are less predictable.

The adoption of NSPs also bolsters interpretability, a core aspect that delineates this framework from purely data-driven learning models. The system emphasizes comprehensible predicate formulations, ultimately aiding in debugging and further refinement.

Future Directions

In reflection, while achieving robustness in simulated domains, real-world implementations might encounter challenges such as sensor noise and partial observability. Future research directions could address integrating more comprehensive perception models to mitigate these challenges, thus closing the sim-to-real gap. Moreover, improvements in the efficiency of the online learning algorithm and extending the framework to precisely handle dynamic and partially observable settings could significantly enhance the practicality of NSPs in broader applications.

In conclusion, "VisualPredicator" decisively advances the integration of neuro-symbolic reasoning within robotics, proposing a practical and flexible adaptation strategy for contemporary robotic planning challenges. This methodology not only sets a precedent for integrating symbolic and neural paradigms but also exhibits a scalable solution for planning in varied and complex environments.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 6 tweets with 83 likes about this paper.